Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Software - Application
Biotechnology
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Software - Application | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $18M | $132M | $838M | $693M | $2.37B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $114M | $14M | $94M | $11M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $115K | $-34M | $14M | $-273M |
| Gross Margin | — | 35.7% | 2.8% | 84.2% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -17.7% | -271.0% | 15.3% | -27.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 1.8x | — | 36.5x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $10M | $746K | $3M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $3M | $18M | $44M | $84M |
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cocrystal Pharma, I… (COCP) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 6.2 | -93.8% |
| Arbutus Biopharma C… (ABUS) | 100 | 114.2 | +14.2% |
| Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) | 100 | 320.6 | +220.6% |
| Relay Therapeutics,… (RLAY) | 100 | 35.3 | -64.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, COCP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AGEN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Better valuation composite
ABUS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 128.2%, EPS growth 55.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -28.8%
- 128.2% revenue growth vs AGEN's 10.4%
RDVT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 0.6%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs ABUS's 1.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 2.8%, current ratio 7.18x
- Beta 1.17, yield 0.6%, current ratio 7.18x
RLAY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +324.1% vs COCP's -11.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 128.2% revenue growth vs AGEN's 10.4% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs RLAY's -25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.17 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +324.1% vs COCP's -11.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs COCP's -92.6%, ROIC 17.6% vs -8.0% |
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RDVT leads in 3 of 6 categories
AGEN leads 2 • COCP leads 0 • ABUS leads 0 • RLAY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AGEN and COCP operate at a comparable scale, with $114M and $0 in trailing revenue. RDVT is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RLAY's -25.5%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $114M | $14M | $94M | $11M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$10M | -$37M | $23M | -$298M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $115,000 | -$34M | $14M | -$273M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$159M | -$40M | $28M | -$213M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +35.7% | +2.8% | +84.2% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -17.7% | -2.7% | +15.3% | -27.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +0.1% | -2.4% | +15.0% | -25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -139.1% | -2.8% | +29.4% | -20.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +27.5% | -33.2% | +17.4% | -60.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.2% | +85.3% | +80.6% | +25.0% | +10.9% |
Valuation Metrics
AGEN leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $132M | $838M | $693M | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $140M | $820M | $652M | $2.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.81x | -1102.94x | -25.59x | 53.95x | -7.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 1.79x | — | 36.50x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 27.38x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 1.16x | 59.47x | 7.68x | 154.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | — | 10.88x | 7.00x | 3.79x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 24.07x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RDVT leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RDVT delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-126 for COCP. ABUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COCP's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RDVT scores 7/9 vs COCP's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -126.1% | — | -42.4% | +14.0% | -43.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -92.6% | +0.1% | -32.5% | +12.8% | -40.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.0% | — | -47.1% | +17.6% | -37.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -91.6% | — | -37.3% | +13.7% | -42.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — | 0.01x | 0.03x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $7M | -$17M | -$41M | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $3M | $18M | $44M | $84M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $10M | $746,000 | $3M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.11x | -129.55x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RDVT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RDVT five years ago would be worth $25,591 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $611 for AGEN. Over the past 12 months, RLAY leads with a +324.1% total return vs COCP's -11.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RDVT at 44.2% vs AGEN's -51.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.4% | +16.1% | -8.8% | -4.4% | +52.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.5% | +27.1% | +32.2% | +21.3% | +324.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | -88.2% | +66.7% | +199.9% | +15.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.2% | -93.9% | +54.8% | +155.9% | -57.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -94.3% | +1.4% | +6.4% | -64.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.4% | -51.0% | +18.6% | +44.2% | +5.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABUS and RDVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RDVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABUS currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs AGEN's 51.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 2.72x | 1.39x | 1.17x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.67 | $7.34 | $5.10 | $64.14 | $17.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.86 | $2.71 | $2.94 | $33.62 | $2.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +52.1% | +51.1% | +85.3% | +76.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.0 | 48.8 | 52.6 | 64.8 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 814K | 2.3M | 118K | 3.1M |
Analyst Outlook
AGEN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGEN as "Buy", ABUS as "Buy", RDVT as "Buy", RLAY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 26.3% for RDVT (target: $62). RDVT is the only dividend payer here at 0.59% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.33 | $8.50 | $62.00 | $21.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 10 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.29 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
RDVT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AGEN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
COCP vs AGEN vs ABUS vs RDVT vs RLAY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) is the stronger pick with 128.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) offers the better valuation at 53. 9x trailing P/E (36. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Agenus Inc. (AGEN) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
Over the past 5 years, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) delivered a total return of +155. 9%, compared to -93. 9% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RDVT returned +6. 4% versus COCP's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 133% more volatile than RDVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 19% for Cocrystal Pharma, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arbutus Biopharma Corporation (ABUS) is pulling ahead at 128.
2% versus 10. 4% for Agenus Inc. (AGEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to 31. 8% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RLAY leads at 123. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 6% net margin versus -1800. 6% for Relay Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RDVT leads at 14. 6% versus -1971. 6% for RLAY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AGEN leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 36. 5x for Red Violet, Inc. — 34. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY?
In this comparison, RDVT (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. COCP, AGEN, ABUS, RLAY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COCP or AGEN or ABUS or RDVT or RLAY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Red Violet, Inc.
(RDVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 6% yield). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RDVT: +6. 4%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COCP and AGEN and ABUS and RDVT and RLAY?
These companies operate in different sectors (COCP (Healthcare) and AGEN (Healthcare) and ABUS (Healthcare) and RDVT (Technology) and RLAY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: COCP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABUS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RDVT is a small-cap high-growth stock; RLAY is a small-cap high-growth stock. RDVT pays a dividend while COCP, AGEN, ABUS, RLAY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.