COHR vs LITE vs VIAV vs IPGP vs MKSI

For growth investors, Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) is the stronger pick with 23. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). MKS Inc. (MKSI) offers the better valuation at 68. 8x trailing P/E (30. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coherent, Inc. (COHR) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the cheapest at 68. 8x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 30. 4x.

Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.

(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -48. 5% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus IPGP's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viavi Solutions Inc.

(VIAV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus Coherent, Inc. 's 2. 79β — meaning COHR is approximately 81% more volatile than VIAV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coherent, Inc. (COHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) is pulling ahead at 23. 4% versus 2. 7% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 55. 5% for MKS Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, COHR leads at 20. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MKS Inc.

(MKSI) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus 0. 8% for Coherent, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc.

(MKSI) trades at 30. 4x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 84. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IPGP: 49. 2% to $151. 67.

In this comparison, MKSI (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. COHR, LITE, VIAV, IPGP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Coherent, Inc.

(COHR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1467% 10Y return). Lumentum Holdings Inc. (LITE) carries a higher beta of 2. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (COHR: +1467%, LITE: +36. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: COHR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.