Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Capital Markets
Financial - Capital Markets
Software - Application
Financial - Capital Markets
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Data & Stock Exchanges | Financial - Capital Markets | Financial - Capital Markets | Software - Application | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $56.80B | $4.62B | $7.71B | $3.43B | $8.86B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.63B | $907M | $647M | $785M | $235M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3.22B | $-1.31B | $-867M | $-261M | $-226M |
| Gross Margin | 81.8% | -47.7% | -15.6% | 41.4% | 91.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | -90.6% | -61.8% | -26.4% | -136.9% |
| Forward P/E | 67.7x | — | — | 12.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $7.66B | $3.65B | $280M | $824M | $429M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $11.62B | $547M | $234M | $43M | $45M |
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coinbase Global, In… (COIN) | 100 | 66.4 | -33.6% |
| Marathon Digital Ho… (MARA) | 100 | 33.1 | -66.9% |
| Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) | 100 | 48.6 | -51.4% |
| CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) | 100 | 295.4 | +195.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 3.17, Low D/E 51.8%, current ratio 7.89x
- Beta 3.17, current ratio 7.89x
- NIM 23.9% vs MARA's 0.1%
- 19.0% margin vs MARA's -144.6%
MARA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 3.11 vs HUT's 4.51
RIOT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 3.87
CLSK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 102.2%, EPS growth 262.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 79.9%
- 102.2% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0%
- Better valuation composite
- 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
HUT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 347.4% 10Y total return vs RIOT's 6.4%
- +5.3% vs MARA's -7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 102.2% revenue growth vs COIN's 1.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.0% margin vs MARA's -144.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 3.11 vs HUT's 4.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.3% vs MARA's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.3% ROA vs RIOT's -21.5%, ROIC 3.6% vs -8.7% |
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
COIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLSK leads 1 • HUT leads 1 • MARA leads 0 • RIOT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.6B annually — 28.2x HUT's $235M. COIN is the more profitable business, keeping 19.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MARA's -144.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.6B | $907M | $647M | $785M | $235M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $627M | -$450M | $181M | -$220M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3.2B | -$1.3B | -$867M | -$261M | -$226M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $326M | -$312M | -$1.0B | -$1.0B | -$342M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +81.8% | -47.7% | -15.6% | +41.4% | +91.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | -90.6% | -61.8% | -26.4% | -136.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.0% | -144.6% | -102.4% | -33.2% | -96.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | -34.4% | -119.6% | -133.1% | -145.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | +11.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | -4.8% | -60.0% | -2.6% | -5.5% |
Valuation Metrics
CLSK leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.0x trailing earnings, CLSK trades at a 73% valuation discount to COIN's 44.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CLSK's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than COIN's 48.3x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56.8B | $4.6B | $7.7B | $3.4B | $8.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52.8B | $7.7B | $7.8B | $4.2B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 44.44x | -3.30x | -10.43x | 11.97x | -37.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 67.71x | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.88x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 48.25x | — | — | 6.31x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.56x | 5.10x | 11.91x | 4.48x | 37.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.84x | 1.24x | 2.43x | 1.96x | 5.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.41x | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
COIN delivers a 20.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-31 for MARA. RIOT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.10x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MARA's 1.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), COIN scores 5/9 vs HUT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.1% | -30.5% | -28.8% | -13.7% | -13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.3% | -17.1% | -21.5% | -8.5% | -8.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | -9.0% | -8.7% | +10.3% | -14.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | -12.1% | -11.0% | +13.7% | -17.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 1.05x | 0.10x | 0.38x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4.0B | $3.1B | $46M | $781M | $384M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $11.6B | $547M | $234M | $43M | $45M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.7B | $3.6B | $280M | $824M | $429M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 47.61x | 4.73x | -16.47x | -18.49x | -10.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HUT five years ago would be worth $32,134 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,624 for MARA. Over the past 12 months, HUT leads with a +530.8% total return vs MARA's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUT at 104.6% vs MARA's 5.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | +22.7% | +43.7% | +16.1% | +57.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -0.8% | -7.1% | +157.5% | +65.8% | +530.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +239.5% | +15.9% | +76.3% | +219.3% | +756.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.6% | -63.8% | -44.4% | -29.4% | +221.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.8% | -54.5% | +641.1% | -85.0% | +347.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +50.3% | +5.0% | +20.8% | +47.3% | +104.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MARA and HUT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MARA is the less volatile stock with a 3.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUT's 4.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUT currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs COIN's 44.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.17x | 3.11x | 3.87x | 3.39x | 4.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $444.65 | $23.45 | $23.94 | $23.61 | $83.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $139.36 | $6.66 | $7.66 | $7.82 | $12.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +44.5% | +51.9% | +85.0% | +56.8% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.0 | 62.1 | 60.1 | 63.0 | 64.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11.2M | 47.7M | 17.8M | 19.0M | 4.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COIN as "Buy", MARA as "Buy", RIOT as "Buy", CLSK as "Buy", HUT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for CLSK (target: $20) vs -2.5% for HUT (target: $79). CLSK is the only dividend payer here at 0.25% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $243.33 | $16.13 | $27.90 | $20.21 | $78.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 19 | 18 | 10 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 2 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +1.0% | +0.1% | +4.2% | 0.0% |
COIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CLSK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
COIN vs MARA vs RIOT vs CLSK vs HUT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
On trailing P/E, CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the cheapest at 12. 0x versus Coinbase Global, Inc. at 44. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
Over the past 5 years, Hut 8 Corp.
(HUT) delivered a total return of +221. 3%, compared to -63. 8% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. (MARA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RIOT returned +641. 1% versus CLSK's -85. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.
(MARA) is the lower-risk stock at 3. 11β versus Hut 8 Corp. 's 4. 51β — meaning HUT is approximately 45% more volatile than MARA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 10% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus 1. 0% for Coinbase Global, Inc. (COIN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -673. 5% for Riot Platforms, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
CleanSpark, Inc.
(CLSK) is the more profitable company, earning 47. 6% net margin versus -144. 6% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 47. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -136. 9% for HUT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUT leads at 91. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CLSK: 50.
7% to $20. 21.
08Which pays a better dividend — COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT?
In this comparison, CLSK (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. COIN, MARA, RIOT, HUT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is COIN or MARA or RIOT or CLSK or HUT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Riot Platforms, Inc.
(RIOT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+641. 1% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RIOT: +641. 1%, CLSK: -85. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COIN and MARA and RIOT and CLSK and HUT?
These companies operate in different sectors (COIN (Financial Services) and MARA (Financial Services) and RIOT (Financial Services) and CLSK (Technology) and HUT (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: COIN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock; RIOT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.