Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $3.95B | $11.81B | $76.14B | $1.17B | $63.74B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.30B | $1.37B | $5.12B | $1.12B | $2.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $62M | $-55M | $229M | $-30M | $440M |
| Gross Margin | 37.1% | 55.7% | 40.6% | 38.6% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 8.2% | 8.2% | -0.5% | 9.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.7x | 55.2x | 87.5x | 29.7x | 114.4x |
| Total Debt | $9.39B | $692M | $1.58B | $245M | $2.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $565M | $424M | $1.09B | $96M | $521M |
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CommScope Holding C… (COMM) | 100 | 172.8 | +72.8% |
| Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) | 100 | 256.3 | +156.3% |
| Ciena Corporation (CIEN) | 100 | 631.0 | +531.0% |
| ADTRAN Holdings, In… (ADTN) | 100 | 89.5 | -10.5% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 956.0 | +856.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
COMM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (11.7x vs 114.4x)
VIAV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.54
- Beta 1.54 vs COMM's 3.42
CIEN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ADTN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.91, Low D/E 47.2%, current ratio 1.76x
LITE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 21.0%, EPS growth 104.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -1.3%
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs CIEN's 32.3%
- Beta 2.69, current ratio 4.37x
- 21.0% revenue growth vs COMM's -7.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.0% revenue growth vs COMM's -7.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.7x vs 114.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.7% margin vs VIAV's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.54 vs COMM's 3.42 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs ADTN's +83.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs ADTN's -2.5%, ROIC -4.3% vs -1.7% |
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LITE leads in 2 of 6 categories
ADTN leads 1 • VIAV leads 1 • COMM leads 0 • CIEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LITE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COMM is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 4.7x ADTN's $1.1B. LITE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VIAV's -4.0%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.3B | $1.4B | $5.1B | $1.1B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $207M | $571M | $43M | $425M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $62M | -$55M | $229M | -$30M | $440M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $268M | $46M | $742M | $58M | $399M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.1% | +55.7% | +40.6% | +38.6% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +8.2% | +8.2% | -0.5% | +9.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | -4.0% | +4.5% | -2.6% | +17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.1% | +3.3% | +14.5% | +5.2% | +16.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.6% | +42.8% | +33.1% | +15.5% | +90.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.4% | -70.2% | +2.3% | +92.9% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
ADTN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 340.3x trailing earnings, VIAV trades at a 86% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ADTN's 17.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $11.8B | $76.1B | $1.2B | $63.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.8B | $12.1B | $76.6B | $1.3B | $65.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.01x | 340.33x | 633.25x | -25.53x | 2412.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.72x | 55.18x | 87.54x | 29.69x | 114.43x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 74.57x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.20x | 90.43x | 169.86x | 17.20x | 859.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.94x | 10.89x | 15.96x | 1.08x | 38.75x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 14.77x | 28.64x | 2.23x | 54.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.93x | 190.52x | 114.44x | 11.98x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CIEN and ADTN and LITE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LITE delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-7 for VIAV. ADTN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.47x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CIEN scores 8/9 vs ADTN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -6.9% | +8.3% | -5.5% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | -2.3% | +4.0% | -2.5% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +5.5% | +6.9% | -1.7% | -4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +4.9% | +6.8% | -1.8% | -4.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.89x | 0.58x | 0.47x | 2.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.8B | $269M | $490M | $149M | $2.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $565M | $424M | $1.1B | $96M | $521M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9.4B | $692M | $1.6B | $245M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.18x | 2.70x | 3.94x | 0.14x | 9.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,752 for ADTN. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs ADTN's +83.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs ADTN's 19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.4% | +181.3% | +118.8% | +67.6% | +131.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +262.9% | +466.6% | +633.9% | +83.0% | +1247.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +284.9% | +461.0% | +1127.8% | +70.9% | +1764.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +212.0% | +899.2% | -22.5% | +976.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -39.7% | +715.5% | +3230.8% | -8.3% | +3635.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +56.7% | +77.7% | +130.7% | +19.6% | +165.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — VIAV and CIEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
VIAV is the less volatile stock with a 1.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COMM's 3.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CIEN currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs ADTN's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.42x | 1.54x | 2.46x | 1.91x | 2.69x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.55 | $60.43 | $583.77 | $18.69 | $1021.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.74 | $8.87 | $70.77 | $7.11 | $60.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.7% | +84.5% | +92.2% | +77.8% | +87.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 66.7 | 71.3 | 50.8 | 58.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.5M | 6.3M | 2.8M | 2.2M | 6.4M |
Analyst Outlook
VIAV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: COMM as "Hold", VIAV as "Buy", CIEN as "Buy", ADTN as "Buy", LITE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 23.7% upside for ADTN (target: $18) vs -37.9% for CIEN (target: $334).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.57 | $32.25 | $334.17 | $18.00 | $643.18 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 19 | 41 | 25 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
LITE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). ADTN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
COMM vs VIAV vs CIEN vs ADTN vs LITE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is the stronger pick with 21. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (COMM). Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) offers the better valuation at 340. 3x trailing P/E (55. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAV) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
On trailing P/E, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the cheapest at 340. 3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, CommScope Holding Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to -22. 5% for ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus COMM's -39. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 54β versus CommScope Holding Company, Inc. 's 3. 42β — meaning COMM is approximately 122% more volatile than VIAV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ADTRAN Holdings, Inc. (ADTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 47% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) is pulling ahead at 21. 0% versus -7. 9% for CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (COMM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Viavi Solutions Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to 46. 6% for Ciena Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIEN leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -6. 8% for CommScope Holding Company, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: COMM leads at 7. 9% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VIAV leads at 56. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, CommScope Holding Company, Inc.
(COMM) trades at 11. 7x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 102. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADTN: 23. 7% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is COMM or VIAV or CIEN or ADTN or LITE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Viavi Solutions Inc.
(VIAV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 5% 10Y return). CommScope Holding Company, Inc. (COMM) carries a higher beta of 3. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (VIAV: +715. 5%, COMM: -39. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between COMM and VIAV and CIEN and ADTN and LITE?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: COMM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VIAV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CIEN is a mid-cap high-growth stock; ADTN is a small-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.