COMP vs HOOD vs SCHW vs EXP vs IBKR

For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Compass, Inc. (COMP) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.

(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, The Charles Schwab Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc.

(IBKR) delivered a total return of +386. 1%, compared to -48. 3% for Compass, Inc. (COMP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBKR returned +823. 8% versus COMP's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning HOOD is approximately 322% more volatile than SCHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IBKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 168% for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 0. 1% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Compass, Inc. grew EPS 67. 7% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for Eagle Materials Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXP leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Robinhood Markets, Inc.

(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -0. 8% for Compass, Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBKR leads at 86. 0% versus -0. 4% for COMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBKR leads at 89. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus The Charles Schwab Corporation's 6. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) trades at 14. 9x forward P/E versus 53. 5x for Compass, Inc. — 38. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COMP: 63. 3% to $14. 29.

In this comparison, SCHW (1.

4% yield), EXP (0. 5% yield), IBKR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. COMP, HOOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Charles Schwab Corporation (SCHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 1. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SCHW: +255. 2%, HOOD: +119. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (COMP (Technology) and HOOD (Financial Services) and SCHW (Financial Services) and EXP (Basic Materials) and IBKR (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: COMP is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SCHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SCHW pays a dividend while COMP, HOOD, EXP, IBKR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.