Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CON vs DBVT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CON
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

Medical - Equipment & Services

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.92B
5Y Perf.-2.1%
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • FR
Market Cap$1721.78T
5Y Perf.+232.2%

CON vs DBVT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CON logoCON
DBVT logoDBVT
IndustryMedical - Equipment & ServicesBiotechnology
Market Cap$2.92B$1721.78T
Revenue (TTM)$2.09B$0.00
Net Income (TTM)$153M$-168M
Gross Margin28.4%
Operating Margin15.5%
Forward P/E15.6x
Total Debt$1.95B$22M
Cash & Equiv.$183M$194M

CON vs DBVTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CON
DBVT
StockJul 24May 26Return
Concentra Group Hol… (CON)10097.9-2.1%
DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT)100332.2+232.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CON vs DBVT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CON leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. DBV Technologies S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
CON
Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.
The Income Pick

CON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.69, yield 52.8%
  • Rev growth 3.4%, EPS growth -8.5%
  • 3.2% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -86.8%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
DBVT
DBV Technologies S.A.
The Momentum Pick

DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +114.1% vs CON's +6.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCON logoCON3.4% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
Quality / MarginsCON logoCON7.3% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
Stability / SafetyCON logoCONBeta 0.69 vs DBVT's 1.26
DividendsCON logoCON52.8% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)DBVT logoDBVT+114.1% vs CON's +6.3%
Efficiency (ROA)CON logoCON5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%

CON vs DBVT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCONLAGGINGDBVT

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

CON and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $2.1B and $0 in trailing revenue.

MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$2.1B$0
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$395M-$112M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$153M-$168M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$176M-$151M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+28.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+8.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+17.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+5.7%+91.5%
DBVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Valuation Metrics

DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
Market CapShares × price$2.9B$1721.78T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.7B$1721.78T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.55x-0.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.63x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.62x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.54x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share9.79x0.66x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.90x
DBVT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CON leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

CON delivers a 37.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CON's 6.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CON scores 5/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+37.4%-130.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.4%-89.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%-145.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage6.53x0.13x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.8B-$172M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$183M$194M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.0B$22M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.09x-189.82x
CON leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CON and DBVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CON five years ago would be worth $10,318 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,344 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +114.1% total return vs CON's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.4% vs CON's 1.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+17.9%+5.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+6.3%+114.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.2%+20.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.2%-66.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+3.2%-86.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+1.0%+6.4%
Evenly matched — CON and DBVT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CON is the less volatile stock with a 0.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CON currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs DBVT's 76.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.69x1.26x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.68$26.18
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$18.55$7.53
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+92.4%+76.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.143.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded637K253K
CON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates CON as "Buy" and DBVT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 130.5% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 35.8% for CON (target: $31). CON is the only dividend payer here at 52.80% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCON logoCONConcentra Group H…DBVT logoDBVTDBV Technologies …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$31.00$46.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts415
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+52.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$12.05
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.5%0.0%
CON leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CON leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). DBVT leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallConcentra Group Holdings Pa… (CON)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CON vs DBVT: Frequently Asked Questions

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CON or DBVT a better buy right now?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

(CON) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (15. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. (CON) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — CON or DBVT?

Over the past 5 years, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

(CON) delivered a total return of +3. 2%, compared to -66. 6% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CON returned +3. 2% versus DBVT's -86. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — CON or DBVT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

(CON) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 69β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 82% more volatile than CON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 7% for Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — CON or DBVT?

On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

grew EPS -8. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — CON or DBVT?

Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

(CON) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 8% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 8. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CON leads at 16. 0% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CON leads at 27. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is CON or DBVT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 130.

5% to $46. 33.

07

Which pays a better dividend — CON or DBVT?

In this comparison, CON (52.

8% yield) pays a dividend. DBVT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is CON or DBVT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Concentra Group Holdings Parent, Inc.

(CON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 69), 52. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CON: +3. 2%, DBVT: -86. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between CON and DBVT?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CON is a small-cap deep-value stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. CON pays a dividend while DBVT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

CON

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DBVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.