CPAC vs CAT

For growth investors, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the stronger pick with 4. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the better valuation at 15. 9x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the cheapest at 15. 9x versus Caterpillar Inc. at 49. 2x. On forward P/E, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. wins at 0. 99x versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 43x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) delivered a total return of +301. 9%, compared to +90. 7% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CAT returned +1223% versus CPAC's +83. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 13β versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning CAT is approximately 1115% more volatile than CPAC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 124% versus 2% for Caterpillar Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is pulling ahead at 4. 3% versus 1. 4% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. grew EPS 17. 9% year-over-year, compared to -14. 6% for Caterpillar Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CAT leads at 4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Caterpillar Inc.

(CAT) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 1% net margin versus 10. 1% for Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPAC leads at 19. 8% versus 16. 6% for CAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPAC leads at 36. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 99x versus Caterpillar Inc. 's 1. 43x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 1x for Caterpillar Inc. — 32. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPAC: 22. 0% to $12. 80.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Cementos Pacasmayo S. A. A. (CPAC) offers the highest yield at 5. 6%, versus 0. 6% for Caterpillar Inc. (CAT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Cementos Pacasmayo S.

A. A. (CPAC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 13), 5. 6% yield). Caterpillar Inc. (CAT) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPAC: +83. 4%, CAT: +1223%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CPAC (Basic Materials) and CAT (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CPAC is a small-cap deep-value stock; CAT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.