Shell Companies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $74M | $898M | $203M | $10.28B | $24.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $372M | $90M | $3.36B | $10.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $89M | $14M | $537M | $382M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 64.0% | 54.7% | 57.1% | 38.1% |
| Operating Margin | 26.3% | 27.5% | 7.0% | 19.8% | 17.5% |
| Forward P/E | 18.3x | 9.5x | 11.8x | 13.0x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $826M | $52M | $4.45B | $4.01B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $473M | $119M | $1.43B | $599M |
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Central Plains Banc… (CPBI) | 100 | 194.6 | +94.6% |
| Mercantile Bank Cor… (MBWM) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 239.0 | +139.0% |
| BOK Financial Corpo… (BOKF) | 100 | 203.7 | +103.7% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPBI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for stability.
- Beta 0.14 vs BOKF's 1.03
MBWM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 178.2% 10Y total return vs CPBI's 92.9%
- NIM 2.9% vs BOKF's 2.4%
- 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
- 1.4% ROA vs CPBI's 0.7%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.6%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.46, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3%
BOKF is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 1.5%
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 0.31 vs BOKF's 4.38
- Beta 0.76, yield 3.5%, current ratio 0.59x
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BOKF's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 11.8x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.32 | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.9% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs BOKF's 1.03 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BOKF's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.6% vs FIS's -35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.4% ROA vs CPBI's 0.7%, ROIC 5.5% vs 4.6% |
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories
CZWI leads 1 • CPBI leads 1 • BOKF leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MBWM leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.9B annually — 576.5x CPBI's $19M. MBWM is the more profitable business, keeping 23.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $372M | $90M | $3.4B | $10.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $107M | $9M | $797M | $3.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $89M | $14M | $537M | $382M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | $11M | $11M | $1.5B | $2.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +64.0% | +54.7% | +57.1% | +38.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +27.5% | +7.0% | +19.8% | +17.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +23.9% | +16.0% | +15.6% | +3.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.2% | +3.0% | +11.5% | +42.6% | +26.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.0% | +14.8% | +63.0% | +1.8% | +92.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — MBWM and FIS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, MBWM trades at a 85% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MBWM offers better value at 0.63x vs BOKF's 5.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74M | $898M | $203M | $10.3B | $24.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $45M | $1.3B | $136M | $13.3B | $27.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.28x | 9.53x | 14.44x | 16.39x | 63.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.54x | 11.78x | 13.05x | 7.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.63x | 2.85x | 5.51x | 2.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.07x | 11.75x | 15.28x | 17.23x | 7.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.91x | 2.42x | 2.25x | 3.06x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.80x | 1.17x | 1.09x | 1.53x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 80.15x | 19.55x | 7.19x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — MBWM and CZWI and FIS each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MBWM delivers a 13.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MBWM's 1.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs MBWM's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.4% | +13.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% | +2.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.6% | +5.5% | +2.0% | +4.1% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | +8.0% | +0.6% | +5.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.14x | 0.28x | 0.80x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$29M | $353M | -$67M | $3.0B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $473M | $119M | $1.4B | $599M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $826M | $52M | $4.5B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 0.79x | 0.16x | 0.55x | 4.64x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CPBI five years ago would be worth $19,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, CZWI leads with a +45.6% total return vs FIS's -35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FIS's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.1% | +10.1% | +21.5% | +13.0% | -27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +23.6% | +45.6% | +44.8% | -35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +127.3% | +160.0% | +79.4% | -6.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +78.4% | +71.2% | +59.4% | -63.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.9% | +178.2% | +157.0% | +168.5% | -13.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.5% | +31.5% | +37.5% | +21.5% | -2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
CPBI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BOKF's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CPBI currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 0.87x | 0.46x | 1.03x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.89 | $55.77 | $22.62 | $139.73 | $82.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.52 | $42.17 | $12.83 | $91.35 | $43.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.1% | +93.3% | +93.2% | +95.5% | +57.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.1 | 53.1 | 63.7 | 58.9 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4K | 112K | 40K | 317K | 5.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BOKF and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MBWM as "Buy", CZWI as "Buy", BOKF as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs -1.4% for BOKF (target: $132). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BOKF's 1.68%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.00 | — | $131.57 | $67.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 2 | 21 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.8% | +1.8% | +1.7% | +3.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 6 | 7 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.47 | $0.37 | $2.24 | $1.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | 0.0% | +3.1% | +0.9% | 0.0% |
MBWM leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CZWI leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
CPBI vs MBWM vs CZWI vs BOKF vs FIS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is the stronger pick with 10.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
On trailing P/E, Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the cheapest at 9.
5x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
Over the past 5 years, Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.
Common Stock (CPBI) delivered a total return of +92. 9%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MBWM returned +178. 2% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Central Plains Bancshares, Inc.
Common Stock (CPBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 14β versus BOK Financial Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning BOKF is approximately 662% more volatile than CPBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 114% for Mercantile Bank Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BOK Financial Corporation (BOKF) is pulling ahead at 10.
4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mercantile Bank Corporation grew EPS 10. 8% year-over-year, compared to -56. 2% for Central Plains Bancshares, Inc. Common Stock. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) is the more profitable company, earning 23.
9% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MBWM leads at 27. 5% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPBI leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus BOK Financial Corporation's 4. 38x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 13. 0x for BOK Financial Corporation — 5. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), MBWM (2. 8% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), BOKF (1. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CPBI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPBI or MBWM or CZWI or BOKF or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, BOKF: +168. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPBI and MBWM and CZWI and BOKF and FIS?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPBI (Financial Services) and MBWM (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and BOKF (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPBI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MBWM is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; BOKF is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. MBWM, CZWI, BOKF, FIS pay a dividend while CPBI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.