Regulated Gas
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
Regulated Gas
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas | Regulated Gas |
| Market Cap | $3.05B | $5.35B | $5.05B | $5.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $586M | $2.32B | $2.47B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $75M | $273M | $358M | $341M |
| Gross Margin | 53.5% | 68.0% | 73.3% | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 25.1% | 20.1% | 22.1% | 24.1% |
| Forward P/E | 19.5x | 17.7x | 16.5x | 16.4x |
| Total Debt | $1.64B | $3.39B | $5.24B | $3.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $34M | $6M | $10M |
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesapeake Utilitie… (CPK) | 100 | 140.6 | +40.6% |
| ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) | 100 | 101.6 | +1.6% |
| Spire Inc. (SR) | 100 | 117.3 | +17.3% |
| New Jersey Resource… (NJR) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.04, yield 2.0%
- Rev growth 18.1%, EPS growth 13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.04, current ratio 0.45x
- Beta 0.04, yield 2.0%, current ratio 0.45x
OGS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SR is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.66 vs OGS's 5.07
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 17.7x), PEG 0.66 vs 5.07
NJR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 90.4% 10Y total return vs CPK's 133.1%
- 15.4% margin vs OGS's 11.8%
- +17.6% vs CPK's -3.2%
- 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.1% revenue growth vs SR's -4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 17.7x), PEG 0.66 vs 5.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.4% margin vs OGS's 11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.04 vs SR's 0.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs SR's 3.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +17.6% vs CPK's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs CPK's 1.9%, ROIC 5.5% vs 6.3% |
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NJR leads in 2 of 6 categories
SR leads 1 • CPK leads 0 • OGS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SR and NJR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 4.2x CPK's $586M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 15.4% (NJR) to 11.8% (OGS). On growth, NJR holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $586M | $2.3B | $2.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $224M | $779M | $864M | $727M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $75M | $273M | $358M | $341M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$156M | -$219M | -$2.7B | -$527M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.5% | +68.0% | +73.3% | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.1% | +20.1% | +22.1% | +24.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.8% | +11.8% | +14.5% | +15.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.6% | -9.4% | -108.1% | -23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -99.9% | -11.1% | -9.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +3.0% | +31.1% | +6.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, NJR trades at a 22% valuation discount to CPK's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SR offers better value at 0.79x vs OGS's 5.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.0B | $5.4B | $5.1B | $5.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.7B | $8.7B | $10.3B | $9.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.28x | 19.52x | 19.57x | 16.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.55x | 17.73x | 16.47x | 16.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.03x | 5.58x | 0.79x | 1.17x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.83x | 11.25x | 12.51x | 14.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.28x | 2.21x | 2.04x | 2.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.50x | 1.48x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CPK and NJR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NJR delivers a 18.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $5 for CPK. OGS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.99x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NJR's 1.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OGS scores 7/9 vs SR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.8% | +8.2% | +10.4% | +18.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +3.1% | +2.9% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.3% | +5.2% | +4.7% | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.7% | +6.2% | +5.8% | +6.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.99x | 1.54x | 1.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $3.4B | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $34M | $6M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.6B | $3.4B | $5.2B | $3.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.65x | 3.25x | 2.62x | 4.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NJR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NJR five years ago would be worth $14,657 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,583 for CPK. Over the past 12 months, NJR leads with a +17.6% total return vs CPK's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SR at 11.5% vs CPK's 2.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.8% | +11.0% | +3.8% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -3.2% | +8.1% | +16.6% | +17.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6.5% | +15.9% | +38.7% | +21.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.8% | +25.2% | +32.1% | +46.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.1% | +76.9% | +71.4% | +90.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | +5.0% | +11.5% | +6.6% |
Risk & Volatility
NJR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NJR is the less volatile stock with a -0.13 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SR's 0.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NJR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs SR's 89.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.04x | -0.00x | 0.06x | -0.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $140.59 | $90.78 | $95.31 | $57.85 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $115.24 | $70.87 | $69.94 | $43.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +94.0% | +89.7% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 42.1 | 34.0 | 44.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 140K | 439K | 346K | 485K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CPK and SR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPK as "Buy", OGS as "Hold", SR as "Buy", NJR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.4% upside for SR (target: $97) vs 0.4% for NJR (target: $56). For income investors, SR offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs CPK's 2.03%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $142.00 | $89.60 | $97.00 | $55.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.0% | +3.1% | +3.6% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 12 | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.58 | $2.66 | $3.10 | $1.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NJR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). SR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CPK vs OGS vs SR vs NJR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPK or OGS or SR or NJR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is the stronger pick with 18.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
On trailing P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the cheapest at 16.
7x versus Chesapeake Utilities Corporation at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, New Jersey Resources Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Spire Inc. wins at 0. 66x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
Over the past 5 years, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) delivered a total return of +46.
6%, compared to +15. 8% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPK returned +133. 1% versus SR's +71. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
13β versus Spire Inc. 's 0. 06β — meaning SR is approximately -149% more volatile than NJR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ONE Gas, Inc. (OGS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 99% versus 158% for New Jersey Resources Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK) is pulling ahead at 18.
1% versus -4. 5% for Spire Inc. (SR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: New Jersey Resources Corporation grew EPS 14. 0% year-over-year, compared to 4. 3% for Spire Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPK leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
5% net margin versus 10. 9% for ONE Gas, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPK leads at 27. 7% versus 18. 8% for OGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SR leads at 78. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPK or OGS or SR or NJR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Spire Inc. (SR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus ONE Gas, Inc. 's 5. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 19. 5x for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation — 3. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SR: 13. 4% to $97. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPK or OGS or SR or NJR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Spire Inc. (SR) offers the highest yield at 3. 6%, versus 2. 0% for Chesapeake Utilities Corporation (CPK).
09Is CPK or OGS or SR or NJR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, New Jersey Resources Corporation (NJR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
13), 3. 2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NJR: +90. 4%, SR: +71. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPK and OGS and SR and NJR?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CPK is a small-cap high-growth stock; OGS is a small-cap high-growth stock; SR is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NJR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.