CPRT vs RMAX

For growth investors, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Copart, Inc. (CPRT) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (21. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Copart, Inc. (CPRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) delivered a total return of +8. 8%, compared to -63. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +528. 5% versus RMAX's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning RMAX is approximately 164% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -5. 2% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. (RMAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Copart, Inc. grew EPS 13. 6% year-over-year, compared to 8. 1% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPRT leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus 2. 8% for RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus 15. 6% for RMAX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMAX leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.

(RMAX) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Copart, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMAX: 50. 7% to $16. 67.

In this comparison, RMAX (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CPRT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Copart, Inc.

(CPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +528. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPRT: +528. 5%, RMAX: -56. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (CPRT (Industrials) and RMAX (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.