Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Real Estate - Services
Real Estate - Services
Auto - Dealerships
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Real Estate - Services | Real Estate - Services | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $32.77B | $223M | $4.08B | $2.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.61B | $292M | $3.94B | $1.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.56B | $8M | $-1.39B | $178M |
| Gross Margin | 45.3% | 70.8% | 7.9% | 46.2% |
| Operating Margin | 36.5% | 16.4% | -9.9% | 10.2% |
| Forward P/E | 21.5x | 8.0x | — | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $104M | $459M | $193M | $1.42B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.78B | $119M | $962M | $142M |
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Copart, Inc. (CPRT) | 100 | 163.0 | +63.0% |
| RE/MAX Holdings, In… (RMAX) | 100 | 33.0 | -67.0% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 42.6 | -57.4% |
| OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) | 100 | 207.2 | +107.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 9.7%, EPS growth 13.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- 5.3% 10Y total return vs KAR's 99.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 8.25x
- Beta 0.52, current ratio 8.25x
RMAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 19.3x)
OPEN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7%
KAR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 1.3%
- 1.3% yield, vs RMAX's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.7% revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.8% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs OPEN's 3.09, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, vs RMAX's 0.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs CPRT's -44.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 20.1% vs -15.8% |
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories
RMAX leads 1 • OPEN leads 1 • KAR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 15.8x RMAX's $292M. CPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 33.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, KAR holds the edge at +0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.6B | $292M | $3.9B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | $74M | -$363M | $288M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $8M | -$1.4B | $178M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.4B | $34M | $1.1B | $337M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.3% | +70.8% | +7.9% | +46.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +16.4% | -9.9% | +10.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.8% | +2.8% | -35.2% | +9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +11.5% | +27.2% | +17.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | -1.8% | -37.6% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -10.0% | -76.2% | -50.0% | +89.7% |
Valuation Metrics
RMAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.7x trailing earnings, KAR trades at a 39% valuation discount to RMAX's 27.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RMAX's 7.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CPRT's 15.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32.8B | $223M | $4.1B | $2.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $30.1B | $564M | $3.3B | $4.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.30x | 27.65x | -3.13x | 16.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 21.54x | 8.03x | — | 19.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.26x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.73x | 7.90x | — | 14.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.05x | 0.76x | 0.93x | 1.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.60x | — | 4.06x | 1.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.62x | 6.65x | 3.93x | 8.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CPRT delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. CPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KAR's 0.93x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KAR scores 8/9 vs OPEN's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.9% | — | -163.2% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.7% | +1.4% | -53.6% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.1% | +10.9% | -15.8% | +6.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.7% | +10.5% | -11.7% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | — | 0.19x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2.7B | $341M | -$769M | $1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $119M | $962M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104M | $459M | $193M | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.62x | -8.92x | 3.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OPEN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KAR five years ago would be worth $16,160 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,845 for OPEN. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs CPRT's -44.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OPEN at 37.4% vs RMAX's -15.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.3% | +49.5% | -12.4% | -6.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -44.7% | +38.4% | +510.1% | +43.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -14.7% | -39.1% | +159.5% | +82.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.8% | -63.2% | -71.6% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +527.2% | -54.8% | -50.8% | +99.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.2% | -15.2% | +37.4% | +22.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CPRT and RMAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RMAX currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs OPEN's 48.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.51x | 1.34x | 3.05x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $63.85 | $11.62 | $10.87 | $31.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $32.20 | $5.46 | $0.51 | $19.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +95.2% | +48.9% | +86.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.5 | 76.4 | 56.2 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.8M | 742K | 36.3M | 976K |
Analyst Outlook
KAR leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CPRT as "Buy", RMAX as "Hold", OPEN as "Hold", KAR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.7% upside for RMAX (target: $17) vs 16.0% for OPEN (target: $6). For income investors, KAR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.30% vs RMAX's 0.22%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $40.50 | $16.67 | $6.17 | $32.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 14 | 26 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | $0.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
CPRT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RMAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CPRT vs RMAX vs OPEN vs KAR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the stronger pick with 9. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). OPENLANE, Inc. (KAR) offers the better valuation at 16. 7x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Copart, Inc. (CPRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
On trailing P/E, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) is the cheapest at 16. 7x versus RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. at 27. 6x. On forward P/E, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
Over the past 5 years, OPENLANE, Inc.
(KAR) delivered a total return of +61. 6%, compared to -71. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPRT returned +528. 5% versus RMAX's -56. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 51β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 05β — meaning OPEN is approximately 503% more volatile than CPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Copart, Inc. (CPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 93% for OPENLANE, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is pulling ahead at 9. 7% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: OPENLANE, Inc. grew EPS 264. 4% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CPRT leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 4% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CPRT leads at 36. 5% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RMAX leads at 57. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, RE/MAX Holdings, Inc.
(RMAX) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 5x for Copart, Inc. — 13. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RMAX: 50. 7% to $16. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR?
In this comparison, KAR (1.
3% yield), RMAX (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. CPRT, OPEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CPRT or RMAX or OPEN or KAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Copart, Inc.
(CPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 51), +528. 5% 10Y return). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPRT: +528. 5%, OPEN: -53. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CPRT and RMAX and OPEN and KAR?
These companies operate in different sectors (CPRT (Industrials) and RMAX (Real Estate) and OPEN (Real Estate) and KAR (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CPRT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RMAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. KAR pays a dividend while CPRT, RMAX, OPEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.