Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $176M | $1712.35T | $5.90B | $297M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9M | $0.00 | $1.56B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-157M | $-168M | $153M | $-160M |
| Gross Margin | -228.1% | — | 65.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -17.1% | — | 12.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 24.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $27M | $22M | $70M | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $194M | $1.12B | $147M |
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caribou Biosciences… (CRBU) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 38.4 | -61.6% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 136.8 | +36.8% |
| Editas Medicine, In… (EDIT) | 100 | 7.2 | -92.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRBU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +147.4% vs ALKS's +16.5%
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.26
ALKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -5.2%, EPS growth -34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.9%
- -11.0% 10Y total return vs DBVT's -87.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, Low D/E 3.8%, current ratio 3.55x
- Beta 1.06, current ratio 3.55x
EDIT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -5.2% revenue growth vs EDIT's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.8% margin vs CRBU's -16.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs CRBU's 2.82, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +147.4% vs ALKS's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRBU leads 0 • DBVT leads 0 • EDIT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALKS and EDIT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.6B and $0 in trailing revenue. ALKS is the more profitable business, keeping 9.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRBU's -16.9%. On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9M | $0 | $1.6B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$155M | -$112M | $212M | $0 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$157M | -$168M | $153M | -$160M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$128M | -$151M | $392M | -$166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | — | +65.4% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -17.1% | — | +12.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -16.9% | — | +9.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -13.7% | — | +25.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.6% | — | +28.2% | -151.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.1% | +91.5% | -4.1% | +105.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DBVT and EDIT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $176M | $1712.35T | $5.9B | $297M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $191M | $1712.35T | $4.9B | $168M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.18x | -0.76x | 24.76x | -1.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 17.25x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 4.00x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 0.66x | 3.28x | 9.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.28x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-5 for EDIT. ALKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EDIT's 0.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALKS scores 7/9 vs EDIT's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -80.8% | -130.2% | +8.8% | -5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.7% | -89.0% | +5.4% | -74.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -55.6% | — | +18.9% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -68.6% | -145.7% | +14.2% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.13x | 0.04x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $15M | -$172M | -$1.0B | -$129M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $194M | $1.1B | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $27M | $22M | $70M | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -189.82x | 32.30x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — DBVT and ALKS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $888 for EDIT. Over the past 12 months, CRBU leads with a +147.4% total return vs ALKS's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DBVT at 6.2% vs EDIT's -32.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +4.9% | +25.3% | +47.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +147.4% | +110.4% | +16.5% | +127.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +19.7% | +14.5% | -68.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | -69.1% | +60.9% | -91.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | -87.0% | -11.0% | -90.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -24.1% | +6.2% | +4.6% | -32.0% |
Risk & Volatility
ALKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRBU's 2.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs CRBU's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.82x | 1.26x | 1.06x | 2.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.54 | $26.18 | $36.60 | $4.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.73 | $7.53 | $25.17 | $1.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.1% | +76.3% | +96.7% | +66.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.5 | 48.1 | 60.2 | 57.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 252K | 2.3M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRBU as "Buy", DBVT as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", EDIT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 272.3% upside for CRBU (target: $7) vs 24.3% for ALKS (target: $44).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $7.00 | $46.33 | $44.00 | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 15 | 28 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% |
ALKS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CRBU vs DBVT vs ALKS vs EDIT: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger pick with -5.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Alkermes plc (ALKS) offers the better valuation at 24. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Caribou Biosciences, Inc. (CRBU) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -91. 1% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ALKS returned -11. 0% versus EDIT's -90. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
06β versus Caribou Biosciences, Inc. 's 2. 82β — meaning CRBU is approximately 166% more volatile than ALKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alkermes plc (ALKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 66% for Editas Medicine, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alkermes plc (ALKS) is pulling ahead at -5.
2% versus -100. 0% for Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Editas Medicine, Inc. grew EPS 37. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus -1690. 4% for Caribou Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus -1708. 1% for CRBU. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ALKS leads at 86. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CRBU or DBVT or ALKS or EDIT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
06)). Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) carries a higher beta of 2. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ALKS: -11. 0%, EDIT: -90. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRBU and DBVT and ALKS and EDIT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.