Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $145M | $5.53B | $1.71B | $9.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $0.00 | $428M | $-92K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $-464M | $-58M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | — | — | 91.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | — | -8.7% | — |
| Total Debt | $159K | $98K | $212M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $714M | $68M | $357M |
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiol Therapeutic… (CRDL) | 100 | 58.8 | -41.2% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 66.3 | -33.7% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 529.7 | +429.7% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 62.9 | -37.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRDL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality is your priority.
- 3.7% margin vs ARDX's -13.6%
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
- Beta 1.37, current ratio 11.16x
ARDX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.87
- Rev growth 22.1%, EPS growth -52.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 98.4%
- 263.5% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.7% vs CRDL's +20.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.1% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs ARDX's -13.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs PRAX's 1.55 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs CRDL's +20.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.8% ROA vs CRDL's -249.4% |
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CRDL leads in 1 of 6 categories
ARDX leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • IMVT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CRDL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $428M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $0 | $428M | -$92,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$33M | -$487M | -$35M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | -$464M | -$58M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$24M | -$423M | -$37M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | — | +91.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | — | -8.7% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | — | -13.6% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | — | -8.8% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | +27.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | +19.7% | +11.8% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CRDL and ARDX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $145M | $5.5B | $1.7B | $9.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $123M | $4.8B | $1.9B | $9.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -3.48x | -9.97x | -26.85x | -24.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | — | 4.20x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.13x | 5.83x | 10.08x | 8.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARDX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARDX delivers a -38.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-38 in annual profit, vs $-3 for CRDL. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ARDX's 1.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARDX scores 3/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.4% | -47.1% | -38.1% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -44.1% | -11.8% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | — | -10.7% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -151.2% | -66.1% | -10.6% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.00x | 1.27x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | -$714M | $144M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $714M | $68M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $158,532 | $98,000 | $212M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -0.28x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,851 for CRDL. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs CRDL's +20.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs IMVT's 12.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.8% | +5.1% | +13.5% | +16.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.4% | +96.1% | +88.6% | +775.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +127.9% | +40.9% | +66.6% | +1976.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.5% | +62.4% | +313.0% | -20.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.3% | +173.6% | +263.5% | -20.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +31.6% | +12.1% | +18.5% | +174.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ARDX and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARDX is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAX's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs CRDL's 76.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.18x | 1.36x | 1.05x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.71 | $30.09 | $8.40 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.88 | $13.36 | $3.21 | $35.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.0% | +90.5% | +83.1% | +93.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 60.2 | 68.6 | 55.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 746K | 1.4M | 3.5M | 378K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRDL as "Buy", IMVT as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 515.4% upside for CRDL (target: $8) vs 64.7% for PRAX (target: $549).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.00 | $45.50 | $17.00 | $548.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 23 | 16 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CRDL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ARDX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
CRDL vs IMVT vs ARDX vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Analysts rate Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. (CRDL) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -51. 5% for Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. (CRDL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARDX returned +253. 1% versus CRDL's -64. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 05β versus Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. 's 1. 40β — meaning PRAX is approximately 33% more volatile than ARDX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 127% for Ardelyx, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cardiol Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS -15. 9% year-over-year, compared to -52. 9% for Ardelyx, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX?
Cardiol Therapeutics Inc.
(CRDL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -15. 1% for Ardelyx, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRDL leads at 0. 0% versus -10. 1% for ARDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ARDX leads at 89. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CRDL or IMVT or ARDX or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), +253. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARDX: +253. 1%, PRAX: -20. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CRDL and IMVT and ARDX and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRDL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.