Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Waste Management
Waste Management
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Engineering & Construction
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Waste Management | Waste Management | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $1M | $207M | $5.35B | $2.92B | $1.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $83K | $59M | $1.88B | $812M | $1.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $-18M | $7M | $17M | $31M |
| Gross Margin | -30.9% | 4.1% | 17.4% | 34.3% | 15.6% |
| Operating Margin | -32.9% | -26.3% | 4.5% | 7.6% | 6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 63.9x | 48.8x | 25.0x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $4M | $1.24B | $25M | $1.95B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25K | $12M | $124M | $33M | $72M |
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI) | 100 | 199.8 | +99.8% |
| Casella Waste Syste… (CWST) | 100 | 167.7 | +67.7% |
| CECO Environmental … (CECO) | 100 | 1532.6 | +1432.6% |
| Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) | 100 | 138.3 | +38.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 9.25x
- Beta 1.83, current ratio 9.25x
Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
- Beta 0.32 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage
CECO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
- 38.8% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
- 2.1% margin vs CREG's -36.2%
AMRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (25.0x vs 48.8x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.8% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.0x vs 48.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs CREG's -36.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +220.1% vs CREG's -92.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -21.7% |
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CECO leads in 3 of 6 categories
AMRC leads 1 • CREG leads 0 • PESI leads 0 • CWST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 23910.9x CREG's $82,839. CECO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREG's -36.2%. On growth, CECO holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $82,839 | $59M | $1.9B | $812M | $2.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | -$14M | $414M | $86M | $204M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | -$18M | $7M | $17M | $31M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $51M | -$14M | $102M | $4M | -$251M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -30.9% | +4.1% | +17.4% | +34.3% | +15.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -32.9% | -26.3% | +4.5% | +7.6% | +6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.2% | -30.1% | +0.4% | +2.1% | +1.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +614.8% | -23.4% | +5.5% | +0.5% | -12.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -20.1% | +9.6% | +21.5% | +13.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.1% | -110.5% | -18.6% | -91.8% | -2.5% |
Valuation Metrics
AMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 35.8x trailing earnings, AMRC trades at a 95% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMRC's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CECO's 38.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1M | $207M | $5.4B | $2.9B | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $200M | $6.5B | $2.9B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.26x | -14.89x | 712.08x | 59.40x | 35.76x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 63.93x | 48.83x | 25.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.39x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 15.74x | 38.01x | 15.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 3.36x | 2.91x | 3.77x | 0.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 4.11x | 3.46x | 9.22x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.45x | — | 63.17x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CECO delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CREG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | -34.5% | +0.5% | +5.4% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | -20.2% | +0.2% | +1.9% | +0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | -21.7% | +2.6% | +10.0% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.0% | -16.7% | +2.9% | +9.4% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.09x | 0.79x | 0.08x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | -$7M | $1.1B | -$8M | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25,341 | $12M | $124M | $33M | $72M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $4M | $1.2B | $25M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.29x | -42.14x | 1.12x | 2.74x | 1.20x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +220.1% total return vs CREG's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 88.7% vs CREG's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.2% | -8.8% | -13.4% | +36.1% | -3.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -92.8% | +26.2% | -28.9% | +220.1% | +134.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.0% | +21.7% | -6.3% | +572.0% | -29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | +45.6% | +25.7% | +1002.7% | -44.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | +178.6% | +1059.4% | +1281.8% | +542.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -69.0% | +6.8% | -2.2% | +88.7% | -11.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CWST and CECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRC's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CECO currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.83x | 1.85x | 0.32x | 1.36x | 2.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $16.50 | $121.24 | $90.25 | $44.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.19 | $8.02 | $74.05 | $24.71 | $12.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +3.2% | +67.7% | +70.5% | +90.2% | +66.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 41.5 | 52.8 | 75.7 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 13.9M | 164K | 874K | 673K | 507K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy", CECO as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 5.9% for CECO (target: $86).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $119.00 | $86.20 | $43.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | 19 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CECO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMRC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
On trailing P/E, Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) is the cheapest at 35. 8x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Ameresco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -99. 5% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1282% versus CREG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Ameresco, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning AMRC is approximately 529% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to -89. 6% for Smart Powerr Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CECO leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
CECO Environmental Corp.
(CECO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -36. 2% for Smart Powerr Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CECO leads at 6. 7% versus -32. 9% for CREG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ameresco, Inc.
(AMRC) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 38. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, CREG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CREG and PESI and CWST and CECO and AMRC?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREG (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and CECO (Industrials) and AMRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.