Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CREG
Smart Powerr Corp.

Renewable Utilities

UtilitiesNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$1M
5Y Perf.-97.8%
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$207M
5Y Perf.+99.8%
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

Waste Management

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.35B
5Y Perf.+67.7%
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.

Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.92B
5Y Perf.+1432.6%
AMRC
Ameresco, Inc.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.57B
5Y Perf.+38.3%

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CREG logoCREG
PESI logoPESI
CWST logoCWST
CECO logoCECO
AMRC logoAMRC
IndustryRenewable UtilitiesWaste ManagementWaste ManagementIndustrial - Pollution & Treatment ControlsEngineering & Construction
Market Cap$1M$207M$5.35B$2.92B$1.57B
Revenue (TTM)$83K$59M$1.88B$812M$1.98B
Net Income (TTM)$-3M$-18M$7M$17M$31M
Gross Margin-30.9%4.1%17.4%34.3%15.6%
Operating Margin-32.9%-26.3%4.5%7.6%6.3%
Forward P/E63.9x48.8x25.0x
Total Debt$5M$4M$1.24B$25M$1.95B
Cash & Equiv.$25K$12M$124M$33M$72M

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CREG
PESI
CWST
CECO
AMRC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG)1002.2-97.8%
Perma-Fix Environme… (PESI)100199.8+99.8%
Casella Waste Syste… (CWST)100167.7+67.7%
CECO Environmental … (CECO)1001532.6+1432.6%
Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC)100138.3+38.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CECO leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Casella Waste Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. AMRC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CREG
Smart Powerr Corp.
The Defensive Pick

CREG is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.83, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 9.25x
  • Beta 1.83, current ratio 9.25x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
PESI
Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PESI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
CWST
Casella Waste Systems, Inc.
The Income Pick

CWST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.32
  • Beta 0.32 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
CECO
CECO Environmental Corp.
The Growth Play

CECO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 38.8%, EPS growth 280.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.4%
  • 12.8% 10Y total return vs CWST's 10.6%
  • 38.8% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
  • 2.1% margin vs CREG's -36.2%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AMRC
Ameresco, Inc.
The Value Play

AMRC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (25.0x vs 48.8x)
Best for: value
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCECO logoCECO38.8% revenue growth vs CREG's -180.7%
ValueAMRC logoAMRCLower P/E (25.0x vs 48.8x)
Quality / MarginsCECO logoCECO2.1% margin vs CREG's -36.2%
Stability / SafetyCWST logoCWSTBeta 0.32 vs AMRC's 2.03, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CECO logoCECO+220.1% vs CREG's -92.8%
Efficiency (ROA)CECO logoCECO1.9% ROA vs PESI's -20.2%, ROIC 10.0% vs -21.7%

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CREGSmart Powerr Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

PESIPerma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Segments Total
50.0%$62M
Treatment
36.6%$45M
Services
13.4%$17M
CWSTCasella Waste Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Collection
74.3%$1.2B
Processing Services
8.9%$144M
Transfer
8.8%$143M
Landfill Revenue
6.1%$98M
Transportation
1.4%$23M
Landfill - Gas To Energy
0.5%$8M
CECOCECO Environmental Corp.
FY 2025
Engineered Systems
70.3%$544M
Industrial Process Solutions
29.7%$230M
AMRCAmeresco, Inc.
FY 2024
Project Revenue
75.6%$1.3B
Energy Assets Revenue
12.1%$213M
Other Revenue
6.3%$111M
Operations And Maintenance Revenue
6.0%$106M

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCECOLAGGINGCWST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AMRC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 23910.9x CREG's $82,839. CECO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREG's -36.2%. On growth, CECO holds the edge at +21.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$82,839$59M$1.9B$812M$2.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$3M-$14M$414M$86M$204M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$3M-$18M$7M$17M$31M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$51M-$14M$102M$4M-$251M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-30.9%+4.1%+17.4%+34.3%+15.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-32.9%-26.3%+4.5%+7.6%+6.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-36.2%-30.1%+0.4%+2.1%+1.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+614.8%-23.4%+5.5%+0.5%-12.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-20.1%+9.6%+21.5%+13.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.1%-110.5%-18.6%-91.8%-2.5%
CECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 35.8x trailing earnings, AMRC trades at a 95% valuation discount to CWST's 712.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMRC's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CECO's 38.0x.

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1M$207M$5.4B$2.9B$1.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$6M$200M$6.5B$2.9B$3.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.26x-14.89x712.08x59.40x35.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.63.93x48.83x25.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.39x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple15.74x38.01x15.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.36x2.91x3.77x0.81x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x4.11x3.46x9.22x1.41x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.45x63.17x
AMRC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CECO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

CECO delivers a 5.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-34 for PESI. CREG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMRC's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PESI scores 5/9 vs CREG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.6%-34.5%+0.5%+5.4%+2.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.3%-20.2%+0.2%+1.9%+0.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital-0.7%-21.7%+2.6%+10.0%+3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.0%-16.7%+2.9%+9.4%+3.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–925454
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.05x0.09x0.79x0.08x1.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$5M-$7M$1.1B-$8M$1.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$25,341$12M$124M$33M$72M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$4M$1.2B$25M$1.9B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-2.29x-42.14x1.12x2.74x1.20x
CECO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CECO five years ago would be worth $110,271 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $52 for CREG. Over the past 12 months, CECO leads with a +220.1% total return vs CREG's -92.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CECO at 88.7% vs CREG's -69.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-65.2%-8.8%-13.4%+36.1%-3.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-92.8%+26.2%-28.9%+220.1%+134.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.0%+21.7%-6.3%+572.0%-29.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.5%+45.6%+25.7%+1002.7%-44.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%+178.6%+1059.4%+1281.8%+542.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-69.0%+6.8%-2.2%+88.7%-11.2%
CECO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CWST and CECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CWST is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMRC's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CECO currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs CREG's 3.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.83x1.85x0.32x1.36x2.03x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$14.70$16.50$121.24$90.25$44.93
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.19$8.02$74.05$24.71$12.37
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+3.2%+67.7%+70.5%+90.2%+66.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10044.041.552.875.768.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded13.9M164K874K673K507K
Evenly matched — CWST and CECO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: PESI as "Hold", CWST as "Buy", CECO as "Buy", AMRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 61.1% upside for PESI (target: $18) vs 5.9% for CECO (target: $86).

MetricCREG logoCREGSmart Powerr Corp.PESI logoPESIPerma-Fix Environ…CWST logoCWSTCasella Waste Sys…CECO logoCECOCECO Environmenta…AMRC logoAMRCAmeresco, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$18.00$119.00$86.20$43.17
# AnalystsCovering analysts1191523
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises110
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — PESI and CWST each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CECO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AMRC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallCECO Environmental Corp. (CECO)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CREG vs PESI vs CWST vs CECO vs AMRC: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, CECO Environmental Corp.

(CECO) is the stronger pick with 38. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). Ameresco, Inc. (AMRC) offers the better valuation at 35. 8x trailing P/E (25. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Casella Waste Systems, Inc. (CWST) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

On trailing P/E, Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) is the cheapest at 35. 8x versus Casella Waste Systems, Inc. at 712. 1x. On forward P/E, Ameresco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 25. 0x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

Over the past 5 years, CECO Environmental Corp.

(CECO) delivered a total return of +1003%, compared to -99. 5% for Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CECO returned +1282% versus CREG's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus Ameresco, Inc. 's 2. 03β — meaning AMRC is approximately 529% more volatile than CWST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 173% for Ameresco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CECO Environmental Corp.

(CECO) is pulling ahead at 38. 8% versus 4. 3% for Perma-Fix Environmental Services, Inc. (PESI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CECO Environmental Corp. grew EPS 280. 6% year-over-year, compared to -89. 6% for Smart Powerr Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CECO leads at 22. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

CECO Environmental Corp.

(CECO) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus -36. 2% for Smart Powerr Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CECO leads at 6. 7% versus -32. 9% for CREG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CECO leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ameresco, Inc.

(AMRC) trades at 25. 0x forward P/E versus 63. 9x for Casella Waste Systems, Inc. — 38. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PESI: 61. 1% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is CREG or PESI or CWST or CECO or AMRC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Casella Waste Systems, Inc.

(CWST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32), +1059% 10Y return). Smart Powerr Corp. (CREG) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CWST: +1059%, CREG: -99. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CREG and PESI and CWST and CECO and AMRC?

These companies operate in different sectors (CREG (Utilities) and PESI (Industrials) and CWST (Industrials) and CECO (Industrials) and AMRC (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: CREG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PESI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CWST is a small-cap high-growth stock; CECO is a small-cap high-growth stock; AMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CREG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Utilities
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PESI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CWST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CECO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.