Auto - Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CREVW vs THRM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Parts
CREVW vs THRM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Parts | Auto - Parts |
| Market Cap | — | $944M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $1.53B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-221M | $23M |
| Gross Margin | -155.1% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | -235.9% | 4.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.6x |
| Total Debt | $111M | $295M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $161M |
CREVW vs THRM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 23 | Apr 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon Revolution P… (CREVW) | 100 | 6.3 | -93.8% |
| Gentherm Incorporat… (THRM) | 100 | 77.7 | -22.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREVW vs THRM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREVW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.80
- Rev growth 86.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, current ratio 0.86x
THRM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- 1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4%
- +19.1% vs CREVW's -89.7%
- 1.6% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -27.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 86.8% revenue growth vs THRM's 2.6% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.5% margin vs CREVW's -309.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs THRM's 1.43 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.1% vs CREVW's -89.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.6% ROA vs CREVW's -198.1%, ROIC 7.3% vs -27.1% |
CREVW vs THRM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CREVW vs THRM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
THRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 21.5x CREVW's $71M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 1.5% (THRM) to -3.1% (CREVW).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $127M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $23M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $79M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -155.1% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.4% | +4.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +1.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -142.6% | +5.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
Valuation Metrics
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $944M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 51.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.57x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.21x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
THRM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), THRM scores 5/9 vs CREVW's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -198.1% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -27.1% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.1% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $107M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $161M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $111M | $295M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -6.46x | 5.83x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
THRM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Over the past 12 months, THRM leads with a +19.1% total return vs CREVW's -89.7%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -51.4% | -16.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -89.7% | +19.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -58.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -14.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -19.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CREVW and THRM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CREVW is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than THRM's 1.43 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. THRM currently trades 78.0% from its 52-week high vs CREVW's 6.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.05 | $39.48 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $25.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +6.8% | +78.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.2 | 59.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 61K | 239K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $36.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +1.1% |
THRM leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
CREVW vs THRM: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREVW or THRM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger pick with 86.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) offers the better valuation at 51. 4x trailing P/E (11. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is safer — CREVW or THRM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Gentherm Incorporated's 1. 43β — meaning THRM is approximately 78% more volatile than CREVW relative to the S&P 500.
03Which is growing faster — CREVW or THRM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is pulling ahead at 86.
8% versus 2. 6% for Gentherm Incorporated (THRM). Over a 3-year CAGR, CREVW leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
04Which has better profit margins — CREVW or THRM?
Gentherm Incorporated (THRM) is the more profitable company, earning 1.
2% net margin versus -309. 4% for Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant — meaning it keeps 1. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: THRM leads at 5. 2% versus -235. 9% for CREVW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — THRM leads at 23. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — CREVW or THRM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
06Is CREVW or THRM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Carbon Revolution Public Limited Company Warrant (CREVW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80)). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between CREVW and THRM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CREVW is a small-cap high-growth stock; THRM is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare THRM vs MPAA
MPAA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to THRM.
Compare CREVW vs CREV
CREV is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CREVW.
Expand With MPAA + DORM
MPAA and DORM are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.