Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Specialty
Advertising Agencies
REIT - Specialty
Advertising Agencies
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | REIT - Specialty | Advertising Agencies | REIT - Specialty | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $39M | $5.78B | $1.21B | $15.35B | $2.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $44M | $1.87B | $1.64B | $2.29B | $723M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $187M | $-205M | $550M | $159M |
| Gross Margin | 43.1% | 46.2% | 39.3% | 23.6% | 63.4% |
| Operating Margin | -22.6% | 17.5% | 18.9% | 28.5% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 27.2x | — | 27.3x | 13.7x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $4.13B | $6.47B | $6.18B | $279M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $100M | $190M | $65M | $553M |
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creative Realities,… (CREX) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) | 100 | 241.5 | +141.5% |
| Clear Channel Outdo… (CCO) | 100 | 247.5 | +147.5% |
| Lamar Advertising C… (LAMR) | 100 | 238.2 | +138.2% |
| Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) | 100 | 225.4 | +125.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CREX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and momentum is your priority.
- 12.6% revenue growth vs OUT's 0.0%
- +130.4% vs MGNI's +12.6%
OUT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 2.69x
Among these 5 stocks, CCO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LAMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 4.3%
- 206.2% 10Y total return vs OUT's 100.2%
- Beta 0.64, yield 4.3%, current ratio 0.95x
- 24.0% margin vs CREX's -21.5%
MGNI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 493.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- Lower P/E (13.7x vs 27.3x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.6% revenue growth vs OUT's 0.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.7x vs 27.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.0% margin vs CREX's -21.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.64 vs MGNI's 1.63 | |
| Dividends | 4.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs OUT's 3.8%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +130.4% vs MGNI's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.0% ROA vs CREX's -14.8%, ROIC 8.2% vs 1.8% |
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LAMR leads in 4 of 6 categories
OUT leads 1 • CREX leads 0 • CCO leads 0 • MGNI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.3B annually — 51.6x CREX's $44M. LAMR is the more profitable business, keeping 24.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CREX's -21.5%. On growth, CCO holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $44M | $1.9B | $1.6B | $2.3B | $723M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $437M | $484M | $1.1B | $145M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $187M | -$205M | $550M | $159M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $234M | $73M | $769M | $44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.1% | +46.2% | +39.3% | +23.6% | +63.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | +17.5% | +18.9% | +28.5% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -21.5% | +10.0% | -12.5% | +24.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +12.5% | +4.4% | +33.6% | +6.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.0% | +10.0% | +11.9% | +4.5% | +5.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.2% | +178.6% | -175.0% | -25.9% | +142.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CREX and CCO and MGNI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.7x trailing earnings, MGNI trades at a 61% valuation discount to OUT's 37.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CREX's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LAMR's 21.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39M | $5.8B | $1.2B | $15.4B | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52M | $9.8B | $7.5B | $21.5B | $1.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.91x | 37.72x | -11.33x | 26.20x | 14.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 27.16x | — | 27.34x | 13.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.37x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.36x | 20.93x | 15.63x | 20.96x | 11.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.77x | 3.15x | 0.76x | 6.78x | 2.81x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 7.57x | — | 14.99x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 67.29x | 26.41x | 37.88x | 20.86x | 12.11x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LAMR delivers a 55.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $56 in annual profit, vs $-36 for CREX. MGNI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAMR's 6.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LAMR scores 6/9 vs CREX's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.8% | +26.8% | — | +55.5% | +18.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.8% | +3.6% | -5.4% | +8.0% | +5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +4.9% | +7.4% | +8.2% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.1% | +6.3% | +9.0% | +11.4% | +7.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 5.63x | — | 6.04x | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $4.0B | $6.3B | $6.1B | -$275M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $100M | $190M | $65M | $553M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $4.1B | $6.5B | $6.2B | $279M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.59x | 2.02x | 1.13x | 4.83x | 4.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
OUT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAMR five years ago would be worth $16,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,906 for MGNI. Over the past 12 months, CREX leads with a +130.4% total return vs MGNI's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors OUT at 35.7% vs CREX's 12.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.0% | +39.7% | +12.3% | +23.1% | -12.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +130.4% | +117.8% | +116.4% | +33.2% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.5% | +150.0% | +88.9% | +78.3% | +58.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +0.5% | +57.9% | -7.0% | +68.1% | -60.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.4% | +100.2% | -43.7% | +206.2% | -4.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.0% | +35.7% | +23.6% | +21.3% | +16.7% |
Risk & Volatility
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LAMR is the less volatile stock with a 0.64 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGNI's 1.63 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAMR currently trades 99.9% from its 52-week high vs MGNI's 52.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.03x | 1.29x | 0.64x | 1.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.35 | $33.08 | $2.43 | $151.36 | $26.65 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $14.45 | $1.00 | $112.00 | $10.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.3% | +99.2% | +97.9% | +99.9% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 70.9 | 48.5 | 69.3 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 1.3M | 7.0M | 557K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
LAMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: OUT as "Buy", CCO as "Hold", LAMR as "Buy", MGNI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.7% upside for MGNI (target: $19) vs -10.6% for OUT (target: $29). For income investors, LAMR offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs OUT's 3.79%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.33 | $2.25 | $155.00 | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 | 16 | 20 | 31 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.8% | — | +4.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.24 | — | $6.46 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% | +2.3% |
LAMR leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OUT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
CREX vs OUT vs CCO vs LAMR vs MGNI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Creative Realities, Inc.
(CREX) is the stronger pick with 12. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 0% for Outfront Media Inc. (OUT). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) offers the better valuation at 14. 7x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Outfront Media Inc. (OUT) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
On trailing P/E, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) is the cheapest at 14. 7x versus Outfront Media Inc. at 37. 7x. On forward P/E, Magnite, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
Over the past 5 years, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) delivered a total return of +68.
1%, compared to -60. 9% for Magnite, Inc. (MGNI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LAMR returned +216. 9% versus CREX's -79. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
64β versus Magnite, Inc. 's 1. 54β — meaning MGNI is approximately 139% more volatile than LAMR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 6% for Lamar Advertising Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Creative Realities, Inc.
(CREX) is pulling ahead at 12. 6% versus 0. 0% for Outfront Media Inc. (OUT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnite, Inc. grew EPS 493. 8% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Outfront Media Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CREX leads at 40. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
9% net margin versus -6. 9% for Creative Realities, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LAMR leads at 30. 8% versus 1. 8% for CREX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MGNI leads at 62. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Magnite, Inc.
(MGNI) trades at 13. 7x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for Lamar Advertising Company — 13. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGNI: 35. 7% to $19. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI?
In this comparison, LAMR (4.
3% yield), OUT (3. 8% yield) pay a dividend. CREX, CCO, MGNI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CREX or OUT or CCO or LAMR or MGNI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
64), 4. 3% yield, +216. 9% 10Y return). Magnite, Inc. (MGNI) carries a higher beta of 1. 54 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LAMR: +216. 9%, MGNI: -3. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CREX and OUT and CCO and LAMR and MGNI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CREX (Technology) and OUT (Real Estate) and CCO (Communication Services) and LAMR (Real Estate) and MGNI (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CREX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OUT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; CCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LAMR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MGNI is a small-cap deep-value stock. OUT, LAMR pay a dividend while CREX, CCO, MGNI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 5%
- Gross Margin > 23%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.