CRH vs VMC vs MLM vs EXP vs LPX

For growth investors, CRH plc (CRH) is the stronger pick with 9.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CRH plc (CRH) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Eagle Materials Inc.

(EXP) is the cheapest at 15. 4x versus Louisiana-Pacific Corporation at 36. 3x. On forward P/E, Eagle Materials Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eagle Materials Inc. wins at 0. 31x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 's 3. 00x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, CRH plc (CRH) delivered a total return of +136.

7%, compared to +10. 5% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LPX returned +346. 8% versus VMC's +162. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus CRH plc's 1. 35β — meaning CRH is approximately 69% more volatile than VMC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 88% for Eagle Materials Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CRH plc (CRH) is pulling ahead at 9.

0% versus -7. 9% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Vulcan Materials Company grew EPS 18. 5% year-over-year, compared to -64. 7% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CRH leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Eagle Materials Inc.

(EXP) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus 5. 4% for Louisiana-Pacific Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXP leads at 26. 5% versus 9. 6% for LPX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CRH leads at 36. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 's 3. 00x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 31. 4x for Vulcan Materials Company — 15. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPX: 35. 0% to $102. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LPX) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 0. 5% for Eagle Materials Inc. (EXP).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Vulcan Materials Company (VMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

80), 0. 7% yield, +162. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VMC: +162. 5%, EXP: +194. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: CRH is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; VMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MLM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXP is a small-cap deep-value stock; LPX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CRH, VMC, MLM, LPX pay a dividend while EXP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.