Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
Auto - Dealerships
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships | Auto - Dealerships |
| Market Cap | $106M | $5.71B | $7.05B | $2.26B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.04B | $27.38B | $27.49B | $2.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-123M | $458M | $679M | $-198M |
| Gross Margin | 33.1% | 11.0% | 17.7% | 52.1% |
| Operating Margin | 1.7% | 1.7% | 4.4% | -7.3% |
| Forward P/E | 5.5x | 14.8x | 9.7x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $845M | $19.43B | $10.18B | $4.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $247M | $59M | $170M |
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| America's Car-Mart,… (CRMT) | 100 | 10.8 | -89.2% |
| CarMax, Inc. (KMX) | 100 | 33.9 | -66.1% |
| AutoNation, Inc. (AN) | 100 | 288.0 | +188.0% |
| Driven Brands Holdi… (DRVN) | 100 | 48.9 | -51.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CRMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 10.9x)
- 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
KMX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
AN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 324.6% 10Y total return vs KMX's -22.1%
- 3.2% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2%
- 2.5% margin vs CRMT's -11.8%
- +16.9% vs CRMT's -72.6%
DRVN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.68
- Rev growth 1.5%, EPS growth 59.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, current ratio 1.52x
- Beta 0.68, current ratio 1.52x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.2% revenue growth vs CRMT's -0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs CRMT's -11.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs CRMT's 1.84 | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +16.9% vs CRMT's -72.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.8% ROA vs CRMT's -7.5%, ROIC 8.5% vs 5.2% |
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AN leads in 3 of 6 categories
CRMT leads 1 • DRVN leads 1 • KMX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AN is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.5B annually — 26.4x CRMT's $1.0B. AN is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CRMT's -11.8%. On growth, AN holds the edge at -2.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $27.4B | $27.5B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $26M | $791M | $1.5B | $17M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$123M | $458M | $679M | -$198M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $1.9B | -$104M | $41M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.1% | +11.0% | +17.7% | +52.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +1.7% | +4.4% | -7.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -11.8% | +1.7% | +2.5% | -9.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.4% | +7.1% | -0.4% | +1.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.7% | -13.4% | -2.1% | -9.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.2% | -46.9% | +33.0% | +5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CRMT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.5x trailing earnings, CRMT trades at a 56% valuation discount to KMX's 12.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CRMT's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DRVN's 126.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $106M | $5.7B | $7.0B | $2.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $941M | $24.9B | $17.2B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.49x | 12.43x | 12.05x | -7.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 14.81x | 9.70x | 10.90x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.38x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.28x | 22.61x | 10.83x | 126.43x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.08x | 0.20x | 0.26x | 0.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.17x | 1.00x | 3.34x | 3.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.48x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AN delivers a 28.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $28 in annual profit, vs $-28 for DRVN. CRMT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DRVN's 6.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KMX scores 8/9 vs AN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -22.6% | +7.5% | +28.4% | -28.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.5% | +1.8% | +4.8% | -4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.2% | +2.4% | +8.5% | -2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.0% | +3.1% | +17.2% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.48x | 3.11x | 4.35x | 6.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $835M | $19.2B | $10.1B | $3.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $247M | $59M | $170M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $845M | $19.4B | $10.2B | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.18x | 3.08x | 4.53x | -1.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AN five years ago would be worth $19,409 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $842 for CRMT. Over the past 12 months, AN leads with a +16.9% total return vs CRMT's -72.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AN at 15.1% vs CRMT's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -47.3% | +1.6% | -0.6% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -72.6% | -39.4% | +16.9% | -24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.9% | -45.1% | +52.4% | -51.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.6% | -69.3% | +94.1% | -51.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.6% | -22.1% | +324.6% | -48.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | -18.1% | +15.1% | -21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AN and DRVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DRVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CRMT's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AN currently trades 89.7% from its 52-week high vs CRMT's 20.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.32x | 0.85x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.72 | $71.99 | $228.92 | $19.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.63 | $30.26 | $174.34 | $9.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +20.4% | +55.4% | +89.7% | +69.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 47.5 | 53.7 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 150K | 3.2M | 412K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
DRVN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CRMT as "Buy", KMX as "Hold", AN as "Buy", DRVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 30.9% upside for DRVN (target: $18) vs -5.3% for KMX (target: $38).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.00 | $37.78 | $248.00 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 35 | 34 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.01 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +7.5% | +11.2% | 0.0% |
AN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CRMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CRMT vs KMX vs AN vs DRVN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the stronger pick with 3. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) offers the better valuation at 5. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
On trailing P/E, America's Car-Mart, Inc.
(CRMT) is the cheapest at 5. 5x versus CarMax, Inc. at 12. 4x. On forward P/E, AutoNation, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
Over the past 5 years, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to -91. 6% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AN returned +324. 6% versus CRMT's -49. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
(DRVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus America's Car-Mart, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning CRMT is approximately 169% more volatile than DRVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 148% versus 7% for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is pulling ahead at 3. 2% versus -0. 2% for America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: America's Car-Mart, Inc. grew EPS 147. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 7% for AutoNation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DRVN leads at 16. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 3% net margin versus -12. 5% for Driven Brands Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CRMT leads at 6. 7% versus -6. 0% for DRVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DRVN leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for CarMax, Inc. — 5. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DRVN: 30. 9% to $18. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CRMT or KMX or AN or DRVN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, AutoNation, Inc.
(AN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), +324. 6% 10Y return). America's Car-Mart, Inc. (CRMT) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AN: +324. 6%, CRMT: -49. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CRMT and KMX and AN and DRVN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CRMT is a small-cap deep-value stock; KMX is a small-cap deep-value stock; AN is a small-cap deep-value stock; DRVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.