Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic |
| Market Cap | $84M | $45.45B | $36.86B | $5.53B | $11.99B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $41M | $4.45B | $9.51B | $0.00 | $4.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $1.10B | $2.64B | $-464M | $-242M |
| Gross Margin | 21.5% | 62.1% | 70.8% | — | 49.4% |
| Operating Margin | -5.6% | 31.6% | 37.9% | — | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.2x | 39.5x | 12.4x | — | 23.3x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.08B | $9.49B | $98K | $4.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $180M | $2.31B | $714M | $545M |
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Champions Oncology,… (CSBR) | 100 | 62.2 | -37.8% |
| IDEXX Laboratories,… (IDXX) | 100 | 185.2 | +85.2% |
| Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) | 100 | 62.6 | -37.4% |
| Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) | 100 | 106.1 | +6.1% |
| Elanco Animal Healt… (ELAN) | 100 | 112.1 | +12.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CSBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 13.5%, EPS growth 161.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.1%
- 13.5% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3%
- Beta 0.38 vs ELAN's 1.42
IDXX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 5.6% 10Y total return vs IMVT's 173.6%
- 32.6% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1%
ZTS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.90, yield 2.3%
- PEG 1.04 vs IDXX's 2.76
- Beta 0.90, yield 2.3%, current ratio 3.03x
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 23.3x)
IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.37, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 11.16x
ELAN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +99.9% vs ZTS's -42.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.5% revenue growth vs IMVT's -21.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 23.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs CSBR's -5.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs ELAN's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.9% vs ZTS's -42.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 32.6% ROA vs IMVT's -44.1% |
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories
CSBR leads 1 • ELAN leads 1 • IDXX leads 0 • IMVT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ZTS and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $9.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. ZTS is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CSBR's -5.4%. On growth, ELAN holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $41M | $4.4B | $9.5B | $0 | $4.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $1.5B | $4.0B | -$487M | $957M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $1.1B | $2.6B | -$464M | -$242M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $845M | $2.1B | -$423M | $315M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.5% | +62.1% | +70.8% | — | +49.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +31.6% | +37.9% | — | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.4% | +24.6% | +27.8% | — | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.2% | +19.0% | +22.5% | — | +6.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +14.3% | +1.9% | — | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.5% | +16.6% | +0.7% | +19.7% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
ZTS leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, ZTS trades at a 67% valuation discount to IDXX's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ZTS offers better value at 1.21x vs IDXX's 3.06x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $45.4B | $36.9B | $5.5B | $12.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $80M | $46.3B | $44.0B | $4.8B | $15.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.15x | 43.75x | 14.50x | -9.97x | -51.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.45x | 12.43x | — | 23.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.06x | 1.21x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.37x | 31.60x | 10.78x | — | 16.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.47x | 10.56x | 3.89x | — | 2.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 22.66x | 28.75x | 11.63x | 5.83x | 1.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.99x | 43.14x | 16.14x | — | 42.21x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CSBR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IDXX delivers a 70.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $71 in annual profit, vs $-57 for CSBR. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ZTS's 2.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSBR scores 7/9 vs IMVT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -56.5% | +70.9% | +62.4% | -47.1% | -3.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +32.6% | +17.5% | -44.1% | -1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.4% | +42.5% | +26.9% | — | +1.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.1% | +61.4% | +29.9% | -66.1% | +2.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.62x | 0.67x | 2.85x | 0.00x | 0.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | $897M | $7.2B | -$714M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $180M | $2.3B | $714M | $545M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.1B | $9.5B | $98,000 | $4.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 179.48x | 35.55x | 11.33x | — | -0.26x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ELAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $16,241 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,561 for ZTS. Over the past 12 months, ELAN leads with a +99.9% total return vs ZTS's -42.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ELAN at 36.9% vs ZTS's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.1% | -14.6% | -29.8% | +5.1% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +3.1% | +17.6% | -42.7% | +96.1% | +99.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +29.4% | +17.9% | -49.8% | +40.9% | +156.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.9% | +5.1% | -44.4% | +62.4% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.9% | +556.2% | +107.3% | +173.6% | -33.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.0% | +5.6% | -20.5% | +12.1% | +36.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSBR and IMVT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CSBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ELAN's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs ZTS's 50.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 1.35x | 0.90x | 1.37x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.63 | $769.98 | $172.23 | $30.09 | $27.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.50 | $471.74 | $85.31 | $13.36 | $10.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.2% | +74.3% | +50.7% | +90.5% | +86.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.2 | 52.1 | 34.9 | 60.2 | 68.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8K | 533K | 3.7M | 1.4M | 4.6M |
Analyst Outlook
ZTS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IDXX as "Buy", ZTS as "Hold", IMVT as "Buy", ELAN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 67.2% upside for IMVT (target: $46) vs 16.1% for ELAN (target: $28). ZTS is the only dividend payer here at 2.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $773.13 | $143.00 | $45.50 | $27.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 22 | 30 | 23 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +2.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 13 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.00 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.7% | +8.8% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ZTS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CSBR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
CSBR vs IDXX vs ZTS vs IMVT vs ELAN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (12. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
On trailing P/E, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Zoetis Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Zoetis Inc. wins at 1. 04x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.
(IMVT) delivered a total return of +62. 4%, compared to -44. 4% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDXX returned +556. 2% versus ELAN's -33. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus Elanco Animal Health Incorporated's 1. 42β — meaning ELAN is approximately 270% more volatile than CSBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Zoetis Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champions Oncology, Inc.
(CSBR) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus 2. 3% for Zoetis Inc. (ZTS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champions Oncology, Inc. grew EPS 161. 1% year-over-year, compared to -169. 1% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDXX leads at 8. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 2% net margin versus -4. 9% for Elanco Animal Health Incorporated — meaning it keeps 28. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ZTS leads at 38. 0% versus 0. 0% for IMVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ZTS leads at 70. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. 's 2. 76x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Zoetis Inc. (ZTS) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 39. 5x for IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. — 27. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMVT: 67. 2% to $45. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN?
In this comparison, ZTS (2.
3% yield) pays a dividend. CSBR, IDXX, IMVT, ELAN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CSBR or IDXX or ZTS or IMVT or ELAN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Zoetis Inc.
(ZTS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 90), 2. 3% yield, +107. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ZTS: +107. 3%, ELAN: -33. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CSBR and IDXX and ZTS and IMVT and ELAN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CSBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IDXX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ZTS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ELAN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. ZTS pays a dividend while CSBR, IDXX, IMVT, ELAN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.