Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.20B | $2.35B | $2.64B | $3.29B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $376M | $867M | $1.12B | $1.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $93M | $169M | $224M | $223M |
| Gross Margin | 63.2% | 72.1% | 71.0% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | 28.4% | 25.3% | 25.5% | 19.7% |
| Forward P/E | 10.9x | 10.8x | 11.5x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $320M | $327M | $1.12B | $1.66B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $370M | $185M | $668M | $205M |
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community Trust Ban… (CTBI) | 100 | 201.9 | +101.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 188.7 | +88.7% |
| WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) | 100 | 159.7 | +59.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTBI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 133.7% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.82 vs WSBC's 0.97
- +36.4% vs NBTB's +9.0%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 1.42 vs CTBI's 2.25
- NIM 3.4% vs WSBC's 2.9%
WSBC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 4.1%
- Rev growth 51.4%, EPS growth 0.0%
- 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4%
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 2.25
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.4% NII/revenue growth vs NBTB's 10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 10.9x), PEG 1.90 vs 2.25 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs WSBC's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CTBI leads in 3 of 6 categories
WSBC leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTBI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 3.8x CTBI's $376M. CTBI is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WSBC's 15.5%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $376M | $867M | $1.1B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $127M | $241M | $323M | $311M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $93M | $169M | $224M | $223M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $104M | $225M | $230M | $262M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +63.2% | +72.1% | +71.0% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +25.3% | +25.5% | +19.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +19.5% | +20.0% | +15.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.8% | +25.2% | +20.7% | +19.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.3% | +39.5% | +5.4% | +24.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — TRMK and WSBC each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, TRMK trades at a 20% valuation discount to WSBC's 15.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs WSBC's 3.02x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $2.4B | $2.6B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $2.5B | $3.1B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.38x | 13.53x | 12.13x | 15.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.91x | 10.80x | 11.50x | 9.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.97x | 1.92x | 1.50x | 3.02x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.31x | 10.35x | 9.49x | 15.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 2.71x | 2.36x | 2.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.57x | 1.21x | 1.28x | 0.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.37x | 10.75x | 11.39x | 11.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CTBI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CTBI delivers a 11.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $6 for WSBC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WSBC scores 8/9 vs CTBI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.2% | +9.5% | +10.8% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +7.9% | +7.1% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.7% | +2.4% | +3.2% | +1.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.17x | 0.53x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$50M | $142M | $448M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $370M | $185M | $668M | $205M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $320M | $327M | $1.1B | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.95x | 1.05x | 0.75x | 0.62x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CTBI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CTBI five years ago would be worth $16,608 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,584 for WSBC. Over the past 12 months, CTBI leads with a +36.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TRMK at 29.8% vs NBTB's 15.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.5% | +9.3% | +15.5% | +3.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.4% | +9.0% | +32.5% | +17.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.4% | +54.1% | +118.5% | +65.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.1% | +29.9% | +47.6% | +5.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +133.7% | +102.2% | +127.7% | +48.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +15.5% | +29.8% | +18.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CTBI and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CTBI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WSBC's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs WSBC's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 0.89x | 0.94x | 0.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $68.72 | $46.92 | $45.99 | $38.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $49.61 | $39.20 | $33.39 | $29.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.5% | +96.1% | +97.6% | +89.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.3 | 57.3 | 56.0 | 48.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 92K | 236K | 392K | 583K |
Analyst Outlook
WSBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTBI as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold", WSBC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.3% upside for WSBC (target: $42) vs -8.0% for CTBI (target: $61). For income investors, WSBC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.08% vs TRMK's 2.15%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $61.00 | $46.00 | $45.50 | $41.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 10 | 9 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.8% | +3.2% | +2.2% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 10 | 12 | 1 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.86 | $1.43 | $0.97 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.0% | +4.6% |
CTBI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WSBC leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
CTBI vs NBTB vs TRMK vs WSBC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is the stronger pick with 51. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
On trailing P/E, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the cheapest at 12.
1x versus WesBanco, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, WesBanco, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Trustmark Corporation wins at 1. 42x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
Over the past 5 years, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) delivered a total return of +66. 1%, compared to +5. 8% for WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CTBI returned +133. 7% versus WSBC's +48. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus WesBanco, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning WSBC is approximately 18% more volatile than CTBI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), WesBanco, Inc.
(WSBC) is pulling ahead at 51. 4% versus 10. 4% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for WesBanco, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus 15. 5% for WesBanco, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTBI leads at 28. 4% versus 19. 7% for WSBC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 42x versus Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 25x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Trustmark Corporation — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WSBC: 21. 3% to $41. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
WesBanco, Inc. (WSBC) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 2. 2% for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK).
09Is CTBI or NBTB or TRMK or WSBC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
(CTBI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 2. 8% yield, +133. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CTBI: +133. 7%, WSBC: +48. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTBI and NBTB and TRMK and WSBC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTBI is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock; WSBC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.