Media & Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTCT vs NVDA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
CTCT vs NVDA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Media & Entertainment | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $1.02B | $5.14T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $362M | $215.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $120.07B |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 7.6% | 60.4% |
| Forward P/E | 72.8x | 25.6x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $11.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $10.61B |
Quick Verdict: CTCT vs NVDA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 3.17x
- Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 7.3%)
NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- Beta 1.73, yield 0.0%, current ratio 3.91x
- 65.5% revenue growth vs CTCT's 16.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs CTCT's 16.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.6x vs 72.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 55.6% margin vs CTCT's 5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (4.6% vs 7.3%) | |
| Dividends | 0.0% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs CTCT's 5.7%, ROIC 81.8% vs 9.0% |
CTCT vs NVDA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTCT vs NVDA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $215.9B annually — 596.7x CTCT's $362M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 55.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTCT's 5.5%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $362M | $215.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $52M | $133.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $120.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $96.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +60.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | +55.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +44.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.0% | +73.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.8% | +97.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CTCT leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, NVDA trades at a 41% valuation discount to CTCT's 72.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTCT's 21.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NVDA's 38.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $5.14T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $929M | $5.14T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 72.75x | 43.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 25.55x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.26x | 38.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.08x | 23.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.98x | 32.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.89x | 53.17x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — CTCT and NVDA each lead in 4 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $7 for CTCT. CTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NVDA's 0.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CTCT scores 8/9 vs NVDA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.1% | +76.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +58.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.0% | +81.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | +97.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$92M | $807M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $10.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $11.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 545.03x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +80.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +625.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +1328.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +23902.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +93.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Risk & Volatility
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | — | $216.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | — | $112.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | — | 164.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $278.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.8% |
NVDA leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CTCT vs NVDA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTCT or NVDA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 2% for Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT). NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (25. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTCT or NVDA?
On trailing P/E, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the cheapest at 43.
2x versus Constant Contact, Inc. at 72. 8x.
03Which is safer — CTCT or NVDA?
On balance sheet safety, Constant Contact, Inc.
(CTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 7% for NVIDIA Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CTCT or NVDA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 16. 2% for Constant Contact, Inc. (CTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Constant Contact, Inc. grew EPS 91. 3% year-over-year, compared to 66. 7% for NVIDIA Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CTCT or NVDA?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 4. 3% for Constant Contact, Inc. — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 6. 0% for CTCT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTCT leads at 72. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — CTCT or NVDA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is CTCT or NVDA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+239.
0% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between CTCT and NVDA?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.