REIT - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
CTO vs PECO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Retail
CTO vs PECO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $686M | $5.04B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $155M | $739M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $12M | $115M |
| Gross Margin | -2.8% | 71.1% |
| Operating Margin | 22.9% | 37.6% |
| Forward P/E | 55.9x | 53.8x |
| Total Debt | $648M | $2.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $4M |
CTO vs PECO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CTO Realty Growth, … (CTO) | 100 | 117.7 | +17.7% |
| Phillips Edison & C… (PECO) | 100 | 696.5 | +596.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTO vs PECO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.37, yield 8.6%
- Rev growth 20.1%, EPS growth 122.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- Beta 0.37, yield 8.6%, current ratio 2.33x
PECO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 6.9% 10Y total return vs CTO's 79.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 96.3%, current ratio 0.66x
- Lower P/E (53.8x vs 55.9x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.1% FFO/revenue growth vs PECO's 10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (53.8x vs 55.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.6% margin vs CTO's 7.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs CTO's 0.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.6% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs PECO's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.8% vs PECO's +16.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs CTO's 1.0%, ROIC 3.0% vs 2.1% |
CTO vs PECO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CTO vs PECO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CTO and PECO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PECO is the larger business by revenue, generating $739M annually — 4.8x CTO's $155M. PECO is the more profitable business, keeping 15.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTO's 7.9%. On growth, CTO holds the edge at +15.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $155M | $739M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $94M | $542M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $12M | $115M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $69M | $207M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.8% | +71.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.9% | +37.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +15.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +28.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +14.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CTO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 45.0x trailing earnings, PECO trades at a 82% valuation discount to CTO's 254.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CTO's 14.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PECO's 16.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $686M | $5.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 254.07x | 45.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 55.88x | 53.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.26x | 16.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.59x | 6.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.87x | 23.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PECO leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PECO delivers a 4.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $2 for CTO. PECO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.96x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CTO's 1.14x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.2% | +4.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.0% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | +4.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.14x | 0.96x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $642M | $2.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $4M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $648M | $2.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 2.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CTO and PECO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PECO five years ago would be worth $74,018 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $15,802 for CTO. Over the past 12 months, CTO leads with a +22.8% total return vs PECO's +16.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CTO at 15.1% vs PECO's 12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.7% | +14.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.8% | +16.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.4% | +44.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.0% | +640.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +693.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.1% | +12.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PECO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PECO is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTO's 0.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.67 | $40.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.07 | $32.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.2% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.1 | 63.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 239K | 822K |
Analyst Outlook
CTO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates CTO as "Buy" and PECO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.9% upside for CTO (target: $22) vs -1.1% for PECO (target: $40). For income investors, CTO offers the higher dividend yield at 8.63% vs PECO's 2.83%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $21.50 | $39.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.75 | $1.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | 0.0% |
CTO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). PECO leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
CTO vs PECO: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTO or PECO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
(CTO) is the stronger pick with 20. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 7% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) offers the better valuation at 45. 0x trailing P/E (53. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTO or PECO?
On trailing P/E, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the cheapest at 45. 0x versus CTO Realty Growth, Inc. at 254. 1x. On forward P/E, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. is actually cheaper at 53. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTO or PECO?
Over the past 5 years, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) delivered a total return of +640. 2%, compared to +58. 0% for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PECO returned +693. 0% versus CTO's +79. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTO or PECO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus CTO Realty Growth, Inc. 's 0. 37β — meaning CTO is approximately 37% more volatile than PECO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 96% versus 114% for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTO or PECO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), CTO Realty Growth, Inc.
(CTO) is pulling ahead at 20. 1% versus 10. 7% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CTO Realty Growth, Inc. grew EPS 122. 8% year-over-year, compared to 74. 5% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CTO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTO or PECO?
Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 2% net margin versus 6. 7% for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PECO leads at 27. 2% versus 22. 1% for CTO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PECO leads at -1. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTO or PECO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) trades at 53. 8x forward P/E versus 55. 9x for CTO Realty Growth, Inc. — 2. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CTO: 5. 9% to $21. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTO or PECO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
CTO Realty Growth, Inc. (CTO) offers the highest yield at 8. 6%, versus 2. 8% for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO).
09Is CTO or PECO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.
(PECO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 2. 8% yield, +693. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PECO: +693. 0%, CTO: +79. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTO and PECO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTO is a small-cap high-growth stock; PECO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.