Rental & Leasing Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
Rental & Leasing Services
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services | Rental & Leasing Services |
| Market Cap | $2.22B | $6.51B | $59.14B | $7.26B | $27.96B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.98B | $1.90B | $16.36B | $3.02B | $2.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $340M | $2.51B | $1.09B | $537M |
| Gross Margin | 19.9% | 33.6% | 36.3% | 38.4% | 31.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.9% | 25.2% | 24.7% | 29.5% | 28.2% |
| Forward P/E | 98.8x | 18.6x | 20.1x | 12.8x | 38.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.42B | $12.81B | $16.48B | $19.73B | $3.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $6M | $4.98B | $459M | $466M | $300M |
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Truck One So… (CTOS) | 100 | 391.1 | +291.1% |
| GATX Corporation (GATX) | 100 | 297.1 | +197.1% |
| United Rentals, Inc. (URI) | 100 | 674.6 | +574.6% |
| Air Lease Corporati… (AL) | 100 | 215.7 | +115.7% |
| FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) | 100 | 2812.6 | +2712.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, CTOS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
GATX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.71, yield 1.4%
- Beta 0.71, yield 1.4%, current ratio 1.27x
- 1.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
URI is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.78 vs GATX's 1.10
- Lower P/E (20.1x vs 38.5x)
AL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, current ratio 0.93x
- 36.1% margin vs CTOS's -0.9%
- Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage
FTAI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 43.2%, EPS growth 15.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 51.4%
- 33.3% 10Y total return vs URI's 14.8%
- 43.2% revenue growth vs URI's 4.9%
- +149.0% vs AL's +22.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.2% revenue growth vs URI's 4.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.1x vs 38.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 36.1% margin vs CTOS's -0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs FTAI's 1.79, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs AL's 1.3%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +149.0% vs AL's +22.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.4% ROA vs CTOS's -0.5%, ROIC 16.8% vs 3.3% |
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories
FTAI leads 2 • GATX leads 1 • CTOS leads 0 • URI leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URI is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.4B annually — 8.6x GATX's $1.9B. AL is the more profitable business, keeping 36.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CTOS's -0.9%. On growth, FTAI holds the edge at +65.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $1.9B | $16.4B | $3.0B | $2.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $375M | $823M | $6.5B | $2.1B | $1.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | $340M | $2.5B | $1.1B | $537M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$297M | $1.5B | -$1.7B | -$1.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.9% | +33.6% | +36.3% | +38.4% | +31.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.9% | +25.2% | +24.7% | +29.5% | +28.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +17.9% | +15.3% | +36.1% | +18.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | -15.6% | +9.1% | -57.4% | -48.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.3% | +38.4% | +7.2% | +15.1% | +65.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.3% | +9.3% | +5.6% | +81.9% | +48.3% |
Valuation Metrics
AL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.0x trailing earnings, AL trades at a 88% valuation discount to FTAI's 59.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AL offers better value at 0.43x vs GATX's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $6.5B | $59.1B | $7.3B | $28.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $14.3B | $75.2B | $6.8B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -69.86x | 20.08x | 24.45x | 7.00x | 59.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 98.78x | 18.56x | 20.14x | 12.76x | 38.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.19x | 0.94x | 0.43x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.29x | 14.52x | 10.61x | — | 31.24x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.14x | 3.74x | 3.67x | 2.41x | 11.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.74x | 1.80x | 6.80x | 0.86x | 84.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 89.34x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTAI delivers a 181.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $181 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CTOS. URI carries lower financial leverage with a 1.84x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTAI's 10.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AL scores 8/9 vs URI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | +10.7% | +27.9% | +13.2% | +181.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +2.2% | +8.4% | +3.3% | +12.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.3% | +3.7% | +12.4% | +4.2% | +16.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.3% | +4.1% | +15.6% | +5.0% | +20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.99x | 3.52x | 1.84x | 2.33x | 10.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.4B | $7.8B | $16.0B | $19.3B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $6M | $5.0B | $459M | $466M | $300M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $12.8B | $16.5B | $19.7B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.98x | 1.04x | 5.72x | 6.32x | 3.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FTAI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FTAI five years ago would be worth $114,680 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,149 for CTOS. Over the past 12 months, FTAI leads with a +149.0% total return vs AL's +22.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FTAI at 115.8% vs CTOS's 16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.6% | +7.6% | +12.0% | +1.7% | +29.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +137.4% | +28.5% | +46.0% | +22.5% | +149.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +56.5% | +68.4% | +182.8% | +79.9% | +905.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.5% | +87.5% | +178.0% | +56.3% | +1046.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.2% | +359.5% | +1482.5% | +129.9% | +3325.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.1% | +19.0% | +41.4% | +21.6% | +115.8% |
Risk & Volatility
AL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AL is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FTAI's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AL currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FTAI's 84.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.68x | 0.73x | 1.17x | 0.33x | 2.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.21 | $205.56 | $1021.47 | $65.00 | $323.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.07 | $143.46 | $647.05 | $51.66 | $105.59 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.8% | +89.1% | +92.4% | +100.0% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.1 | 64.4 | 69.4 | 66.3 | 63.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 956K | 188K | 557K | 2.5M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
GATX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CTOS as "Buy", GATX as "Buy", URI as "Buy", AL as "Buy", FTAI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for GATX (target: $220) vs 0.0% for AL (target: $65). For income investors, GATX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.37% vs FTAI's 0.45%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.00 | $220.00 | $1037.13 | $65.00 | $314.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 40 | 20 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.4% | +0.8% | +1.3% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 19 | 4 | 13 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.51 | $7.18 | $0.87 | $1.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.0% | +3.3% | 0.0% | +0.4% |
AL leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). FTAI leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
CTOS vs GATX vs URI vs AL vs FTAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is the stronger pick with 43. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 9% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI). Air Lease Corporation (AL) offers the better valuation at 7. 0x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
On trailing P/E, Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the cheapest at 7.
0x versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Air Lease Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Rentals, Inc. wins at 0. 78x versus GATX Corporation's 1. 10x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) delivered a total return of +1047%, compared to -8. 5% for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. (CTOS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTAI returned +33. 0% versus CTOS's -1. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
33β versus FTAI Aviation Ltd. 's 2. 01β — meaning FTAI is approximately 503% more volatile than AL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 184% versus 10% for FTAI Aviation Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Aviation Ltd.
(FTAI) is pulling ahead at 43. 2% versus 4. 9% for United Rentals, Inc. (URI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FTAI Aviation Ltd. grew EPS 1538% year-over-year, compared to -16. 7% for Custom Truck One Source, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FTAI leads at 51. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
Air Lease Corporation (AL) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -1. 6% for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AL leads at 50. 5% versus 7. 3% for CTOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AL leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Rentals, Inc. (URI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus GATX Corporation's 1. 10x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Air Lease Corporation (AL) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 98. 8x for Custom Truck One Source, Inc. — 86. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GATX: 20. 1% to $220. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI?
In this comparison, GATX (1.
4% yield), AL (1. 3% yield), URI (0. 8% yield), FTAI (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. CTOS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CTOS or GATX or URI or AL or FTAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, United Rentals, Inc.
(URI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17), 0. 8% yield, +1471% 10Y return). FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (URI: +1471%, FTAI: +33. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTOS and GATX and URI and AL and FTAI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTOS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GATX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AL is a small-cap deep-value stock; FTAI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. GATX, URI, AL pay a dividend while CTOS, FTAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.