Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $12M | $7.68B | $39.48B | $1.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $1.40B | $4.29B | $55M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $317M | $577M | $-164M |
| Gross Margin | — | 81.9% | 80.9% | 99.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 58.4% | 17.5% | -237.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 8.1x | 44.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $2M | $0.00 | $1.28B | $149M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $134M | $1.66B | $15M |
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citius Pharmaceutic… (CTXR) | 100 | 3.0 | -97.0% |
| Halozyme Therapeuti… (HALO) | 100 | 268.6 | +168.6% |
| Alnylam Pharmaceuti… (ALNY) | 100 | 218.8 | +118.8% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 25.6 | -74.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CTXR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HALO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.56
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs ALNY's 411.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
- Beta 0.56, current ratio 4.66x
ALNY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 65.2%, EPS growth 206.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 53.0%
- 65.2% revenue growth vs CTXR's -100.0%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs HALO's -7.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.2% revenue growth vs CTXR's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.7% margin vs NKTR's -297.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.56 vs CTXR's 2.76 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs HALO's -7.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.5% ROA vs NKTR's -62.8%, ROIC 73.4% vs -57.2% |
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • CTXR leads 0 • ALNY leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HALO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ALNY and CTXR operate at a comparable scale, with $4.3B and $0 in trailing revenue. HALO is the more profitable business, keeping 22.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NKTR's -3.0%. On growth, ALNY holds the edge at +96.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $1.4B | $4.3B | $55M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$38M | $945M | $677M | -$130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $317M | $577M | -$164M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $645M | $641M | -$209M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +81.9% | +80.9% | +99.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +58.4% | +17.5% | -2.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +22.7% | +13.5% | -3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +46.2% | +15.0% | -3.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +51.6% | +96.4% | -25.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +74.1% | -2.1% | +4.4% | -4.5% |
Valuation Metrics
HALO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.5x trailing earnings, HALO trades at a 80% valuation discount to ALNY's 127.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, HALO's 8.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALNY's 70.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $12M | $7.7B | $39.5B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9M | $7.5B | $39.1B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.19x | 25.46x | 127.00x | -8.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.09x | 44.18x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.11x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.34x | 70.17x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 5.50x | 10.63x | 30.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.09x | 165.47x | 50.50x | 15.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.91x | 84.84x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HALO delivers a 6.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. CTXR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALNY scores 6/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -48.3% | +6.5% | +98.3% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -28.6% | +12.5% | +11.8% | -62.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -39.5% | +73.4% | +33.4% | -57.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -46.2% | +38.2% | +15.3% | -55.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | — | 1.62x | 1.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | -$134M | -$379M | $134M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $134M | $1.7B | $15M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $0 | $1.3B | $149M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -143.54x | 46.08x | 2.02x | -4.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALNY five years ago would be worth $22,537 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $121 for CTXR. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs HALO's -7.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs CTXR's -72.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.9% | -7.3% | -26.1% | +92.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -6.2% | -7.1% | +7.0% | +818.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | +115.3% | +40.9% | +621.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.8% | +37.0% | +125.4% | -72.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +570.7% | +411.9% | -59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.7% | +29.1% | +12.1% | +93.3% |
Risk & Volatility
HALO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HALO is the less volatile stock with a 0.56 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CTXR's 2.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HALO currently trades 79.3% from its 52-week high vs CTXR's 26.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.76x | 0.56x | 0.71x | 1.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.48 | $82.22 | $495.55 | $109.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.57 | $47.50 | $245.96 | $7.99 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +26.4% | +79.3% | +59.7% | +76.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 52.4 | 43.8 | 53.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 746K | 1.4M | 1.1M | 991K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HALO as "Buy", ALNY as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 59.3% upside for NKTR (target: $133) vs 20.2% for HALO (target: $78).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $78.33 | $445.67 | $132.83 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 27 | 52 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
HALO leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns).
CTXR vs HALO vs ALNY vs NKTR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is the stronger pick with 65. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) offers the better valuation at 25. 5x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. (HALO) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
On trailing P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the cheapest at 25. 5x versus Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 127. 0x. On forward P/E, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
Over the past 5 years, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) delivered a total return of +125. 4%, compared to -98. 8% for Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CTXR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HALO returned +570. 7% versus CTXR's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 56β versus Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 's 2. 76β — meaning CTXR is approximately 395% more volatile than HALO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CTXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(ALNY) is pulling ahead at 65. 2% versus -43. 9% for Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. grew EPS 206. 9% year-over-year, compared to -25. 4% for Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALNY leads at 53. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 7% net margin versus -297. 1% for Nektar Therapeutics — meaning it keeps 22. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HALO leads at 58. 4% versus -236. 8% for NKTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 44. 2x for Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — 36. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKTR: 59. 3% to $132. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CTXR or HALO or ALNY or NKTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halozyme Therapeutics, Inc.
(HALO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +570. 7% 10Y return). Citius Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (CTXR) carries a higher beta of 2. 76 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HALO: +570. 7%, CTXR: -99. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CTXR and HALO and ALNY and NKTR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CTXR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HALO is a small-cap high-growth stock; ALNY is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.