REIT - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
REIT - Residential
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Retail | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential | REIT - Residential |
| Market Cap | $2.91B | $756M | $3.86B | $24.68B | $15.17B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $203M | $252M | $662M | $3.12B | $2.21B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $-32M | $48M | $954M | $403M |
| Gross Margin | 49.6% | 91.1% | 20.2% | 46.3% | 23.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.4% | 11.5% | 17.5% | 28.5% | 27.4% |
| Forward P/E | 126.1x | — | 99.9x | 50.6x | 39.0x |
| Total Debt | $490M | $1.56B | $2.28B | $8.78B | $5.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $290M | $14M | $48M | $56M | $60M |
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Curbline Properties… (CURB) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| NexPoint Residentia… (NXRT) | 100 | 67.7 | -32.3% |
| Independence Realty… (IRT) | 100 | 79.9 | -20.1% |
| Equity Residential (EQR) | 100 | 88.5 | -11.5% |
| Mid-America Apartme… (MAA) | 100 | 82.0 | -18.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CURB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 51.3%, EPS growth 289.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 25.6%, current ratio 5.11x
- 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2%
- +20.8% vs MAA's -17.2%
NXRT is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MAA's 4.6%
IRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 191.8% 10Y total return vs NXRT's 211.1%
EQR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 30.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7%
- 4.6% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.1%
MAA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 4.6%
- PEG 3.38 vs EQR's 9.94
- Beta 0.34, yield 4.6%, current ratio 0.16x
- Lower P/E (39.0x vs 50.6x), PEG 3.38 vs 9.94
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.3% FFO/revenue growth vs NXRT's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.0x vs 50.6x), PEG 3.38 vs 9.94 | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.6% margin vs NXRT's -12.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs NXRT's 0.62, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs MAA's 4.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.8% vs MAA's -17.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.6% ROA vs NXRT's -1.7%, ROIC 4.2% vs 1.1% |
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NXRT leads in 1 of 6 categories
EQR leads 1 • CURB leads 1 • IRT leads 0 • MAA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CURB and NXRT and EQR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EQR is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.1B annually — 15.4x CURB's $203M. EQR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NXRT's -12.7%. On growth, CURB holds the edge at +50.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $203M | $252M | $662M | $3.1B | $2.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $117M | $125M | $365M | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | -$32M | $48M | $954M | $403M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $121M | $79M | $139M | $1.3B | $596M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.6% | +91.1% | +20.2% | +46.3% | +23.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +11.5% | +17.5% | +28.5% | +27.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.2% | -12.7% | +7.3% | +30.6% | +18.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +59.5% | +31.2% | +21.1% | +42.7% | +26.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.9% | +0.5% | +2.5% | +2.5% | +0.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -66.2% | 0.0% | -101.4% | -64.2% | -31.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NXRT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.6x trailing earnings, EQR trades at a 70% valuation discount to CURB's 74.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MAA offers better value at 2.99x vs EQR's 4.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $756M | $3.9B | $24.7B | $15.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.1B | $2.3B | $6.1B | $33.4B | $20.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.51x | -23.65x | 68.21x | 22.63x | 34.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 126.06x | — | 99.88x | 50.61x | 39.03x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 4.44x | 2.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.19x | 18.60x | 16.71x | 15.61x | 16.52x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.91x | 3.01x | 5.87x | 7.96x | 6.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.52x | 2.52x | 1.07x | 2.24x | 2.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.35x | 9.05x | 26.33x | 19.13x | 21.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EQR delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-10 for NXRT. CURB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NXRT's 5.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRT scores 6/9 vs MAA's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.7% | -10.1% | +1.3% | +8.4% | +6.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -1.7% | +0.8% | +4.6% | +3.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.3% | +1.1% | +1.6% | +4.2% | +4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.4% | +1.5% | +2.4% | +5.7% | +5.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.26x | 5.18x | 0.64x | 0.77x | 0.93x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $200M | $1.5B | $2.2B | $8.7B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $290M | $14M | $48M | $56M | $60M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $490M | $1.6B | $2.3B | $8.8B | $5.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.31x | 0.47x | 1.73x | 5.58x | 3.76x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CURB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CURB five years ago would be worth $14,438 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,705 for NXRT. Over the past 12 months, CURB leads with a +20.8% total return vs MAA's -17.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURB at 13.0% vs NXRT's -5.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +19.9% | +2.6% | -6.0% | +8.4% | -4.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | -15.2% | -11.9% | -2.7% | -17.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | -15.5% | +7.4% | +17.5% | -2.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | -23.0% | +17.8% | +6.7% | +0.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.4% | +211.1% | +191.8% | +29.3% | +71.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +13.0% | -5.5% | +2.4% | +5.5% | -0.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURB and MAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAA is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NXRT's 0.62 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CURB currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs NXRT's 77.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.47x | 0.62x | 0.48x | 0.38x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.94 | $38.30 | $19.61 | $71.80 | $166.04 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.62 | $23.79 | $14.60 | $57.58 | $120.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.3% | +77.8% | +83.5% | +91.7% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.2 | 71.0 | 62.4 | 69.8 | 59.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 730K | 216K | 2.2M | 2.4M | 858K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NXRT and MAA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CURB as "Buy", NXRT as "Hold", IRT as "Buy", EQR as "Hold", MAA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.7% upside for IRT (target: $20) vs -9.4% for NXRT (target: $27). For income investors, NXRT offers the higher dividend yield at 7.07% vs CURB's 2.67%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $28.50 | $27.00 | $20.08 | $70.15 | $143.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 10 | 27 | 46 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +7.1% | +4.0% | +4.1% | +4.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.73 | $2.11 | $0.66 | $2.69 | $6.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.0% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.2% |
NXRT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EQR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
CURB vs NXRT vs IRT vs EQR vs MAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is the stronger pick with 51. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.
6x versus Curbline Properties Corp. at 74. 5x. On forward P/E, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. is actually cheaper at 39. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. wins at 3. 38x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
Over the past 5 years, Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) delivered a total return of +44. 4%, compared to -23. 0% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NXRT returned +211. 1% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
(MAA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. 's 0. 62β — meaning NXRT is approximately 86% more volatile than MAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 5% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Curbline Properties Corp.
(CURB) is pulling ahead at 51. 3% versus -3. 2% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Curbline Properties Corp. grew EPS 289. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 8% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CURB leads at 35. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.
1% net margin versus -12. 7% for NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 11. 1% for NXRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NXRT leads at 84. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 38x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc. (MAA) trades at 39. 0x forward P/E versus 126. 1x for Curbline Properties Corp. — 87. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IRT: 22. 7% to $20. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NexPoint Residential Trust, Inc. (NXRT) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 2. 7% for Curbline Properties Corp. (CURB).
09Is CURB or NXRT or IRT or EQR or MAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mid-America Apartment Communities, Inc.
(MAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 4. 6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAA: +71. 9%, NXRT: +211. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CURB and NXRT and IRT and EQR and MAA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CURB is a small-cap high-growth stock; NXRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IRT is a small-cap income-oriented stock; EQR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; MAA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.