Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $330M | $477M | $2.83B | $616.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $521M | $4.04B | $40.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $33M | $441M | $22.24B |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 7.6% | 28.7% | 80.4% |
| Operating Margin | -59.0% | -3.8% | 19.4% | 60.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.5x | 5.1x | 24.6x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $217M | $0.00 | $25.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $64M | $169M | $1.23B | $20.15B |
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Currenc Group, Inc. (CURR) | 100 | 211.3 | +111.3% |
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| The Western Union C… (WU) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CURR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability and momentum is your priority.
- Beta 0.06 vs V's 0.68
- +242.1% vs V's -7.4%
IMXI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
WU is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.4%
- Beta 0.63, yield 10.4%, current ratio 16.52x
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.5x)
- 10.4% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
- 329.1% 10Y total return vs CURR's 110.2%
- PEG 1.55 vs IMXI's 2.50
- 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 10.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs CURR's -85.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs V's 0.68 | |
| Dividends | 10.4% yield, 11-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +242.1% vs V's -7.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.7% ROA vs CURR's -34.0% |
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 2 of 6 categories
WU leads 1 • CURR leads 1 • IMXI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 861.4x CURR's $46M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CURR's -85.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $521M | $4.0B | $40.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | -$3M | $838M | $27.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $33M | $441M | $22.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $16M | $331M | $21.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.4% | +7.6% | +28.7% | +80.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -59.0% | -3.8% | +19.4% | +60.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -85.0% | +6.3% | +12.4% | +50.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +3.0% | +9.7% | +53.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -63.4% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +139.7% | -38.8% | -44.4% | +35.3% |
Valuation Metrics
WU leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, WU trades at a 81% valuation discount to V's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), V offers better value at 1.99x vs IMXI's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $330M | $477M | $2.8B | $616.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $289M | $525M | $1.6B | $621.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.18x | 14.69x | 5.90x | 31.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.45x | 5.12x | 24.59x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.51x | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 1.68x | 24.65x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.11x | 0.92x | 0.70x | 15.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.97x | 3.09x | 16.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 114.91x | 30.18x | 7.20x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
V leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $22 for IMXI. V carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IMXI's 1.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CURR scores 6/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +22.1% | +47.9% | +58.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -34.0% | +6.5% | +5.5% | +22.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -7.6% | +23.3% | +29.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | -5.8% | +12.5% | +36.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.34x | — | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$41M | $48M | -$1.2B | $5.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $64M | $169M | $1.2B | $20.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $217M | $0 | $25.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -10.70x | -1.69x | 2.11x | 26.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CURR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CURR five years ago would be worth $52,606 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,468 for WU. Over the past 12 months, CURR leads with a +242.1% total return vs V's -7.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CURR at 2.1% vs IMXI's -14.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +127.4% | +3.4% | +0.4% | -7.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +242.1% | +51.6% | +4.5% | -7.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2858.1% | -38.0% | -3.3% | +41.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +426.1% | +9.4% | -45.3% | +42.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.2% | +63.5% | -7.6% | +329.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.1% | -14.8% | -1.1% | +12.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURR and IMXI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than V's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs V's 85.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 0.37x | 0.63x | 0.68x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.68 | $15.95 | $10.35 | $375.51 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.33 | $8.58 | $7.85 | $293.89 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.1% | +99.4% | +87.2% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.4 | 46.9 | 45.5 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 164K | 358K | 8.1M | 6.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WU and V each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMXI as "Buy", WU as "Hold", V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for IMXI (target: $27) vs -18.8% for CURR (target: $4). For income investors, WU offers the higher dividend yield at 10.45% vs V's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $27.00 | $9.00 | $362.45 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 48 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +10.4% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 11 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.94 | $2.36 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.4% | +8.3% | +2.2% |
V leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
CURR vs IMXI vs WU vs V: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CURR or IMXI or WU or V a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). The Western Union Company (WU) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (5. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
On trailing P/E, The Western Union Company (WU) is the cheapest at 5.
9x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, The Western Union Company is actually cheaper at 5. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Visa Inc. wins at 1. 55x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
Over the past 5 years, Currenc Group, Inc.
(CURR) delivered a total return of +426. 1%, compared to -45. 3% for The Western Union Company (WU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: V returned +329. 1% versus WU's -7. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Currenc Group, Inc.
(CURR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Visa Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning V is approximately 984% more volatile than CURR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Visa Inc. (V) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 134% for International Money Express, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.
(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Visa Inc. grew EPS 4. 8% year-over-year, compared to -390. 5% for Currenc Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus -85. 0% for Currenc Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -59. 0% for CURR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CURR or IMXI or WU or V more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Visa Inc. (V) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 55x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Western Union Company (WU) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 24. 6x for Visa Inc. — 19. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMXI: 70. 2% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CURR or IMXI or WU or V?
In this comparison, WU (10.
4% yield), V (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. CURR, IMXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CURR or IMXI or WU or V better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Visa Inc.
(V) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 68), 0. 7% yield, +329. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (V: +329. 1%, IMXI: +63. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CURR and IMXI and WU and V?
These companies operate in different sectors (CURR (Financial Services) and IMXI (Technology) and WU (Financial Services) and V (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CURR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMXI is a small-cap deep-value stock; WU is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WU, V pay a dividend while CURR, IMXI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.