Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail |
| Market Cap | $164M | $2.83B | $3.58B | $6.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.00B | $5.50B | $5.27B | $6.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $192M | $507M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 34.8% | 33.0% | 58.6% | 36.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.1% | 6.0% | 13.4% | 9.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.1x | 7.9x | 13.6x |
| Total Debt | $149M | $1.73B | $1.17B | $1.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $239M | $760M | $369M |
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) | 100 | 6.7 | -93.3% |
| American Eagle Outf… (AEO) | 100 | 48.4 | -51.6% |
| Abercrombie & Fitch… (ANF) | 100 | 206.2 | +106.2% |
| Urban Outfitters, I… (URBN) | 100 | 192.3 | +92.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CURV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.38
- Beta 0.38 vs AEO's 2.07
AEO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +51.4% vs CURV's -71.4%
ANF carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 217.6% 10Y total return vs URBN's 146.9%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 13.6x)
- 9.6% margin vs CURV's -0.7%
- 15.1% ROA vs CURV's -1.7%, ROIC 31.4% vs 22.5%
URBN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 43.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- Beta 1.35, current ratio 1.51x
- 11.1% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs CURV's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.6% margin vs CURV's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs AEO's 2.07 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.4% vs CURV's -71.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.1% ROA vs CURV's -1.7%, ROIC 31.4% vs 22.5% |
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ANF leads in 4 of 6 categories
AEO leads 1 • CURV leads 0 • URBN leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
URBN is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.2B annually — 6.2x CURV's $1.0B. ANF is the more profitable business, keeping 9.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CURV's -0.7%. On growth, URBN holds the edge at +10.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.0B | $5.5B | $5.3B | $6.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $75M | $546M | $862M | $614M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $192M | $507M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$22M | $25M | $378M | $445M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +34.8% | +33.0% | +58.6% | +36.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +6.0% | +13.4% | +9.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +3.5% | +9.6% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +0.5% | +7.2% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.3% | +9.7% | +5.4% | +10.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -185.7% | -7.4% | +3.1% | -18.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ANF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.5x trailing earnings, ANF trades at a 51% valuation discount to AEO's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ANF's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CURV's 13.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $164M | $2.8B | $3.6B | $6.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $293M | $4.3B | $4.0B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -22.29x | 15.30x | 7.45x | 14.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.09x | 7.92x | 13.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.06x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.68x | 8.01x | 4.65x | 9.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.16x | 0.51x | 0.68x | 1.04x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.74x | 2.66x | 2.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 9.45x | 14.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ANF delivers a 38.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $12 for AEO. URBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AEO's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URBN scores 8/9 vs AEO's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +12.1% | +38.5% | +16.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.7% | +4.8% | +15.1% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.5% | +8.1% | +31.4% | +13.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.4% | +10.7% | +30.5% | +16.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.02x | 0.82x | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $129M | $1.5B | $409M | $856M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $239M | $760M | $369M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $149M | $1.7B | $1.2B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.84x | 75.18x | 302.38x | 2531.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANF five years ago would be worth $19,120 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $646 for CURV. Over the past 12 months, AEO leads with a +51.4% total return vs CURV's -71.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANF at 49.6% vs CURV's -25.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.2% | -35.8% | -37.0% | -5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -71.4% | +51.4% | +6.4% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -59.3% | +34.7% | +234.8% | +152.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | -47.9% | +91.2% | +89.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.5% | +45.8% | +217.6% | +146.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -25.9% | +10.4% | +49.6% | +36.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CURV and URBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CURV is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AEO's 2.07 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. URBN currently trades 84.8% from its 52-week high vs CURV's 25.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 2.07x | 1.40x | 1.35x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.08 | $28.46 | $133.11 | $84.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.94 | $9.27 | $65.45 | $51.30 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +25.7% | +58.6% | +58.6% | +84.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.2 | 38.8 | 31.9 | 52.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 856K | 5.2M | 1.2M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
AEO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CURV as "Hold", AEO as "Hold", ANF as "Hold", URBN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 50.1% upside for ANF (target: $117) vs -3.2% for CURV (target: $2).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1.51 | $24.83 | $117.00 | $89.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 52 | 55 | 58 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +12.6% | +5.4% |
ANF leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AEO leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
CURV vs AEO vs ANF vs URBN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). Abercrombie & Fitch Co. (ANF) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (7. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
On trailing P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the cheapest at 7. 5x versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. at 15. 3x. On forward P/E, Abercrombie & Fitch Co. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
Over the past 5 years, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) delivered a total return of +91. 2%, compared to -93. 5% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANF returned +217. 6% versus CURV's -93. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 38β versus American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. 's 2. 07β — meaning AEO is approximately 443% more volatile than CURV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 102% for American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -9. 4% for Torrid Holdings Inc. (CURV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Urban Outfitters, Inc. grew EPS 18. 8% year-over-year, compared to -146. 7% for Torrid Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ANF leads at 12. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 6% net margin versus -0. 7% for Torrid Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ANF leads at 13. 3% versus 2. 1% for CURV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ANF leads at 58. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
(ANF) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 13. 6x for Urban Outfitters, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANF: 50. 1% to $117. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CURV or AEO or ANF or URBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Torrid Holdings Inc.
(CURV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 38)). American Eagle Outfitters, Inc. (AEO) carries a higher beta of 2. 07 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CURV: -93. 5%, AEO: +45. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CURV and AEO and ANF and URBN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CURV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AEO is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANF is a small-cap deep-value stock; URBN is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.