Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $15M | $6.36B | $157M | $1.69B | $1.71B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $18M | $8M | $55M | $428M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-115M | $-124M | $-164M | $-58M |
| Gross Margin | — | 100.0% | 81.7% | 99.6% | 91.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | -8.1% | -15.8% | -237.9% | -8.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.6x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $10M | $94M | $149M | $212M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $128M | $152M | $15M | $68M |
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cadrenal Therapeuti… (CVKD) | 100 | 14.4 | -85.6% |
| Protagonist Therape… (PTGX) | 100 | 743.8 | +643.8% |
| TScan Therapeutics,… (TCRX) | 100 | 66.5 | -33.5% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 204.3 | +104.3% |
| Ardelyx, Inc. (ARDX) | 100 | 238.2 | +138.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CVKD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in quality.
- 5.2% margin vs TCRX's -15.2%
PTGX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- beta 0.25
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs ARDX's 263.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.25, Low D/E 1.7%, current ratio 12.71x
- Beta 0.25, current ratio 12.71x
TCRX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 266.7%, EPS growth 12.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.6%
- 266.7% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +8.2% vs CVKD's -63.0%
ARDX is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- -11.8% ROA vs CVKD's -217.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 266.7% revenue growth vs PTGX's -89.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.2% margin vs TCRX's -15.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.25 vs TCRX's 2.35, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs CVKD's -63.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -11.8% ROA vs CVKD's -217.7% |
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARDX leads in 1 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • PTGX leads 1 • CVKD leads 0 • TCRX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARDX and CVKD operate at a comparable scale, with $428M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -13.6% (ARDX) to -15.2% (TCRX). On growth, ARDX holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $18M | $8M | $55M | $428M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | -$141M | -$127M | -$130M | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$115M | -$124M | -$164M | -$58M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | -$116M | -$125M | -$209M | -$37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +100.0% | +81.7% | +99.6% | +91.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -8.1% | -15.8% | -2.4% | -8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -6.5% | -15.2% | -3.0% | -13.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -6.6% | -15.3% | -3.8% | -8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | -100.0% | -25.3% | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.2% | +126.3% | +15.4% | -4.5% | +11.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PTGX and TCRX and ARDX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $15M | $6.4B | $157M | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $6.2B | $99M | $1.8B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.91x | -48.22x | -1.21x | -8.57x | -26.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.60x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 138.15x | 15.22x | 30.64x | 4.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.38x | 10.22x | 1.28x | 15.66x | 10.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 113.36x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — PTGX and ARDX each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PTGX delivers a -17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-18 in annual profit, vs $-4 for NKTR. PTGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTGX scores 4/9 vs CVKD's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | -17.8% | -91.9% | -4.0% | -38.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.2% | -16.5% | -50.1% | -62.8% | -11.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -21.8% | -90.7% | -57.2% | -10.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.6% | -23.9% | -49.8% | -55.7% | -10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.02x | 0.76x | 1.66x | 1.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$118M | -$58M | $134M | $144M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $128M | $152M | $15M | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $10M | $94M | $149M | $212M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -73.07x | -4.74x | -0.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARDX five years ago would be worth $41,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $974 for CVKD. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs CVKD's -63.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs CVKD's -34.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.9% | +13.4% | +18.6% | +92.0% | +13.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -63.0% | +129.4% | -11.0% | +818.2% | +88.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.7% | +296.5% | -46.2% | +621.8% | +66.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | +238.8% | -88.5% | -72.3% | +313.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -90.3% | +744.9% | -88.5% | -59.1% | +263.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -34.4% | +58.3% | -18.7% | +93.3% | +18.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PTGX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PTGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCRX's 2.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PTGX currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs CVKD's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.12x | 0.25x | 2.35x | 1.85x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.50 | $107.84 | $2.57 | $109.00 | $8.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $41.29 | $0.88 | $7.99 | $3.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +91.7% | +47.1% | +76.5% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 56.4 | 56.8 | 53.4 | 68.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 53K | 752K | 910K | 991K | 3.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PTGX as "Buy", TCRX as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", ARDX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 519.8% upside for TCRX (target: $8) vs 18.1% for PTGX (target: $117).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $116.75 | $7.50 | $132.83 | $17.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 26 | 8 | 33 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
ARDX leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). NKTR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
CVKD vs PTGX vs TCRX vs NKTR vs ARDX: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TScan Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRX) is the stronger pick with 266. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). Analysts rate Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX?
Over the past 5 years, Ardelyx, Inc.
(ARDX) delivered a total return of +313. 0%, compared to -90. 3% for Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (CVKD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTGX returned +744. 9% versus CVKD's -90. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 25β versus TScan Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 35β — meaning TCRX is approximately 838% more volatile than PTGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TScan Therapeutics, Inc.
(TCRX) is pulling ahead at 266. 7% versus -89. 4% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc. (PTGX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 23. 9% year-over-year, compared to -148. 5% for Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ARDX leads at 98. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX?
Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc.
Common Stock (CVKD) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1256. 8% for TScan Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CVKD leads at 0. 0% versus -1315. 4% for TCRX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TCRX: 519.
8% to $7. 50.
07Which pays a better dividend — CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is CVKD or PTGX or TCRX or NKTR or ARDX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 25), +744. 9% 10Y return). Cadrenal Therapeutics, Inc. Common Stock (CVKD) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTGX: +744. 9%, CVKD: -90. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between CVKD and PTGX and TCRX and NKTR and ARDX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CVKD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PTGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TCRX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARDX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.