Regulated Water
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Regulated Water
Construction
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Regulated Water | Renewable Utilities | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Regulated Water | Construction |
| Market Cap | $529M | $281.02B | $6.29B | $955M | $7.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $132M | $39.38B | $10.99B | $199M | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18M | $9.38B | $414M | $44M | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 36.6% | 19.9% | 24.3% | 33.3% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 139015.1% | 3.9% | 4.9% | 28.1% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 31.6x | 37.6x | 11.2x | 20.1x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $708.60B | $0.00 | $2.76B | $419M | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $123.79T | $8.85B | $856M | $3M | $113M |
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consolidated Water … (CWCO) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| Mohawk Industries, … (MHK) | 100 | 78.5 | -21.5% |
| Middlesex Water Com… (MSEX) | 100 | 97.9 | -2.1% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 132.9 | +32.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWCO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 100.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, Low D/E 0.3%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76, yield 100.0%, current ratio 6.12x
- Beta 0.76 vs GEV's 1.76
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs AWI's 330.4%
- 23.8% margin vs MHK's 3.8%
- +157.4% vs MSEX's -12.8%
MHK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.2x vs 19.9x)
Among these 5 stocks, MSEX doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AWI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 12.1% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4%
- 16.0% ROA vs CWCO's 0.0%, ROIC 24.9% vs 26.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.1% revenue growth vs CWCO's -1.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.2x vs 19.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs MHK's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs GEV's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs MSEX's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +157.4% vs MSEX's -12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs CWCO's 0.0%, ROIC 24.9% vs 26.6% |
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories
CWCO leads 0 • MHK leads 0 • MSEX leads 0 • AWI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 298.1x CWCO's $132M. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MHK's 3.8%. On growth, GEV holds the edge at +16.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $132M | $39.4B | $11.0B | $199M | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $25.98T | $2.2B | $1.2B | $81M | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18M | $9.4B | $414M | $44M | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $33.67T | $3.6B | $709M | -$19M | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +19.9% | +24.3% | +33.3% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +139015.1% | +3.9% | +4.9% | +28.1% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +23.8% | +3.8% | +22.1% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +254916.5% | +9.2% | +6.5% | -9.7% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.4% | +16.1% | +8.0% | +10.0% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.5% | +18.2% | +65.2% | -100.0% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CWCO and MHK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.3x trailing earnings, MHK trades at a 71% valuation discount to GEV's 59.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MHK's 7.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 121.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $529M | $281.0B | $6.3B | $955M | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$123.08T | $272.2B | $8.2B | $1.4B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 59.12x | 17.33x | 21.78x | 23.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.60x | 37.62x | 11.23x | 20.12x | 19.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 13.62x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | -4.74x | 121.45x | 7.05x | 15.79x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.01x | 7.38x | 0.58x | 4.91x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 23.47x | 0.77x | 1.89x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 0.00x | 75.73x | 10.20x | — | 28.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — GEV and AWI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $0 for CWCO. CWCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSEX's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs MSEX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | 0.0% | +79.7% | +5.0% | +9.1% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | 0.0% | +15.2% | +3.0% | +3.2% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +26.6% | +27.9% | +3.9% | +4.7% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.0% | +6.6% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.33x | 0.85x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$123.08T | -$8.8B | $1.9B | $416M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $123.79T | $8.8B | $856M | $3M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $708.6B | $0 | $2.8B | $419M | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 36.90x | 4.33x | 13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,472 for MHK. Over the past 12 months, GEV leads with a +157.4% total return vs MSEX's -12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs MSEX's -9.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.9% | +54.0% | -6.2% | +3.0% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +47.9% | +157.4% | +1.9% | -12.8% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.4% | +698.3% | +2.9% | -25.2% | +151.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +197.4% | +698.3% | -55.3% | -28.4% | +63.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +155.1% | +698.3% | -47.6% | +62.9% | +330.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.3% | +99.9% | +0.9% | -9.2% | +36.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEV and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSEX is the less volatile stock with a -0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GEV's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MHK's 71.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 1.76x | 1.34x | -0.12x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.12 | $1181.95 | $143.13 | $62.18 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $22.69 | $387.03 | $93.60 | $44.17 | $148.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.8% | +88.5% | +71.8% | +82.7% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.9 | 66.5 | 50.6 | 44.1 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 163K | 2.4M | 1.1M | 160K | 494K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CWCO and MSEX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CWCO as "Buy", GEV as "Buy", MHK as "Hold", MSEX as "Buy", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.5% upside for MHK (target: $130) vs 4.1% for MSEX (target: $54). For income investors, CWCO offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $130.00 | $53.50 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 | 32 | 4 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +0.1% | — | +2.7% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $497756.41 | $1.00 | — | $1.37 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | +2.4% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
GEV leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
CWCO vs GEV vs MHK vs MSEX vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
On trailing P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) is the cheapest at 17. 3x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -55. 3% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. (MHK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +698. 3% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
12β versus GE Vernova Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning GEV is approximately -1515% more volatile than MSEX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 85% for Middlesex Water Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -1. 4% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd. (CWCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Consolidated Water Co. Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CWCO leads at 12. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus 3. 4% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CWCO leads at 139015% versus 3. 6% for GEV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.
(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 37. 6x for GE Vernova Inc. — 26. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MHK: 26. 5% to $130. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI?
In this comparison, CWCO (100.
0% yield), MSEX (2. 7% yield), AWI (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. GEV, MHK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CWCO or GEV or MHK or MSEX or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Middlesex Water Company (MSEX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
12), 2. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSEX: +62. 9%, MHK: -47. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWCO and GEV and MHK and MSEX and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (CWCO (Utilities) and GEV (Utilities) and MHK (Consumer Cyclical) and MSEX (Utilities) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CWCO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MHK is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSEX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CWCO, MSEX, AWI pay a dividend while GEV, MHK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.