Asset Management
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Asset Management
Biotechnology
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Biotechnology | Asset Management | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $21M | $2.50B | $40.44B | $132M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $236M | $6.47B | $114M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $-369M | $527M | $115K |
| Gross Margin | 48.2% | 90.7% | 74.8% | 35.7% |
| Operating Margin | -26.0% | -168.6% | 27.2% | -17.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 20.2x | 1.8x |
| Total Debt | $82M | $99M | $14.91B | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $222M | $1.50B | $3M |
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CaliberCos Inc. (CWD) | 100 | 1.9 | -98.1% |
| Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS) | 100 | 120.7 | +20.7% |
| Ares Management Cor… (ARES) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
| Agenus Inc. (AGEN) | 100 | 12.0 | -88.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CWD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +209.6% vs CWD's -79.8%
ARES carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 1.62, yield 6.6%
- 9.3% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 45.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, current ratio 2.24x
- Beta 1.62, yield 6.6%, current ratio 2.24x
AGEN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 66.6% NII/revenue growth vs CWD's -43.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs RCUS's -156.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.62 vs AGEN's 2.72 | |
| Dividends | 6.6% yield; 7-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +209.6% vs CWD's -79.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs RCUS's -35.3%, ROIC 6.1% vs -64.1% |
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ARES leads in 4 of 6 categories
CWD leads 0 • RCUS leads 0 • AGEN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARES leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARES is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.5B annually — 126.6x CWD's $51M. ARES is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, AGEN holds the edge at +27.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $236M | $6.5B | $114M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$7M | -$391M | $1.8B | -$10M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | -$369M | $527M | $115,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$489M | $1.5B | -$159M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.2% | +90.7% | +74.8% | +35.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | -168.6% | +27.2% | -17.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -38.7% | -156.4% | +8.2% | +0.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.1% | -2.1% | +23.9% | -139.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -39.3% | — | +27.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +10.5% | -80.9% | +85.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CWD and AGEN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $2.5B | $40.4B | $132M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $101M | $2.4B | $53.9B | $140M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.07x | -7.54x | 62.83x | -1102.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 20.23x | 1.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.56x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 26.88x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.41x | 10.11x | 6.25x | 1.16x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.88x | 4.22x | 3.08x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.04x | — | 26.19x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
ARES leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ARES delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-2 for CWD. RCUS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CWD's 7.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ARES scores 8/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.3% | -69.0% | +6.2% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -25.3% | -35.3% | +1.9% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.4% | -64.1% | +6.1% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | -42.1% | +7.3% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 7.27x | 0.16x | 1.71x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $79M | -$123M | $13.4B | $7M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $222M | $1.5B | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $82M | $99M | $14.9B | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.64x | -13.38x | 2.68x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ARES leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ARES five years ago would be worth $26,021 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $62 for CWD. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +209.6% total return vs CWD's -79.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ARES at 18.1% vs CWD's -81.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -30.9% | +6.5% | -25.1% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -79.8% | +209.6% | -21.1% | +27.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +24.9% | +64.7% | -88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | -18.6% | +160.2% | -93.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.4% | +45.9% | +929.6% | -94.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -81.6% | +7.7% | +18.1% | -51.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RCUS and ARES each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ARES is the less volatile stock with a 1.62 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGEN's 2.72 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RCUS currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs CWD's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.84x | 1.95x | 1.62x | 2.72x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.00 | $28.72 | $195.26 | $7.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.87 | $7.06 | $95.80 | $2.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +86.3% | +63.1% | +51.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 60.5 | 63.2 | 48.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 153K | 1.2M | 3.7M | 814K |
Analyst Outlook
ARES leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RCUS as "Buy", ARES as "Buy", AGEN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 95.5% upside for AGEN (target: $7) vs 21.0% for RCUS (target: $30). ARES is the only dividend payer here at 6.56% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $30.00 | $177.38 | $7.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 22 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +6.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $8.08 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
ARES leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
CWD vs RCUS vs ARES vs AGEN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the stronger pick with 66.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -43. 8% for CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). Ares Management Corporation (ARES) offers the better valuation at 62. 8x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
On forward P/E, Agenus Inc.
is actually cheaper at 1. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
Over the past 5 years, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) delivered a total return of +160.
2%, compared to -99. 4% for CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARES returned +929. 6% versus CWD's -99. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
62β versus Agenus Inc. 's 2. 72β — meaning AGEN is approximately 68% more volatile than ARES relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 7% for CaliberCos Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is pulling ahead at 66.
6% versus -43. 8% for CaliberCos Inc. (CWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Agenus Inc. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -42. 9% for CaliberCos Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
2% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARES leads at 27. 2% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Agenus Inc.
(AGEN) trades at 1. 8x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for Ares Management Corporation — 18. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AGEN: 95. 5% to $7. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN?
In this comparison, ARES (6.
6% yield) pays a dividend. CWD, RCUS, AGEN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CWD or RCUS or ARES or AGEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (6.
6% yield, +929. 6% 10Y return). Agenus Inc. (AGEN) carries a higher beta of 2. 72 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ARES: +929. 6%, AGEN: -94. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CWD and RCUS and ARES and AGEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (CWD (Financial Services) and RCUS (Healthcare) and ARES (Financial Services) and AGEN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CWD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARES is a mid-cap high-growth stock; AGEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. ARES pays a dividend while CWD, RCUS, AGEN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.