Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Financial - Credit Services
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $3M | $431M | $1.39B | $819M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $953M | $32M | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-12M | $56M | $-157M | $-305M |
| Gross Margin | 83.5% | 21.4% | 15.4% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | -351.0% | 14.8% | -5.6% | 33.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.5x | — | 26.4x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $1.05B | $21M | $32M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $77M | $106M | $104M |
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| CXApp Inc. (CXAI) | 100 | 1.5 | -98.5% |
| Priority Technology… (PRTH) | 100 | 57.9 | -42.1% |
| Enovix Corporation (ENVX) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 57.8 | -42.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXAI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PRTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.12
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 26.4x)
- 5.8% margin vs ENVX's -492.6%
- 2.6% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7%, ROIC 13.4% vs -52.9%
ENVX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 37.9%, EPS growth 40.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0%
PRAA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- -32.6% 10Y total return vs PRTH's -46.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.82, Low D/E 3.1%, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 1.82, current ratio 1.68x
- Beta 1.82 vs ENVX's 3.40, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 37.9% revenue growth vs CXAI's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 26.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs ENVX's -492.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.82 vs ENVX's 3.40, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +56.9% vs CXAI's -86.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.6% ROA vs CXAI's -41.7%, ROIC 13.4% vs -52.9% |
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRTH leads in 3 of 6 categories
CXAI leads 1 • PRAA leads 1 • ENVX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRTH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 301.9x CXAI's $4M. PRTH is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ENVX's -4.9%. On growth, ENVX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $953M | $32M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $204M | -$142M | $431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$12M | $56M | -$157M | -$305M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | $75M | -$114M | -$90M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.5% | +21.4% | +15.4% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.5% | +14.8% | -5.6% | +33.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +5.8% | -4.9% | -24.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.3% | +7.9% | -3.6% | -7.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +8.8% | +15.9% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.1% | +3.1% | +20.0% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CXAI leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PRAA's 1.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PRTH's 6.8x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3M | $431M | $1.4B | $819M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4M | $1.4B | $1.3B | $746M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.13x | 7.74x | -8.92x | -2.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.52x | — | 26.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.85x | — | 1.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.42x | 0.45x | 43.65x | 0.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.16x | — | 5.07x | 0.80x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRTH leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ENVX delivers a -0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-0 in annual profit, vs $-78 for CXAI. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CXAI's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PRTH scores 6/9 vs CXAI's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -78.0% | — | -0.1% | -26.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -41.7% | +2.6% | -0.0% | -5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -52.9% | +13.4% | -74.2% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -59.1% | +16.0% | -27.5% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.36x | — | 0.08x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $708,000 | $969M | -$85M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $77M | $106M | $104M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $1.0B | $21M | $32M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.39x | 1.51x | -7.03x | 0.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — PRTH and PRAA each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRTH five years ago would be worth $8,092 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $156 for CXAI. Over the past 12 months, PRAA leads with a +56.9% total return vs CXAI's -86.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRTH at 12.8% vs CXAI's -74.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -54.8% | -1.1% | -15.2% | +21.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -86.1% | -23.8% | +9.9% | +56.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | +43.7% | -49.8% | -38.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.4% | -19.1% | -48.9% | -46.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | -46.3% | -46.7% | -32.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -74.7% | +12.8% | -20.5% | -14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
PRAA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRAA is the less volatile stock with a 1.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ENVX's 3.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAA currently trades 94.4% from its 52-week high vs CXAI's 10.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.90x | 2.12x | 3.40x | 1.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.45 | $8.89 | $16.49 | $22.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.14 | $4.44 | $4.62 | $10.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +10.7% | +59.2% | +40.6% | +94.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.4 | 52.3 | 62.5 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 9.3M | 253K | 5.8M | 447K |
Analyst Outlook
PRTH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: PRTH as "Buy", ENVX as "Buy", PRAA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 165.3% upside for ENVX (target: $18) vs 22.1% for PRAA (target: $26).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.00 | $17.75 | $26.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 16 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +4.2% | +2.4% |
PRTH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CXAI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
CXAI vs PRTH vs ENVX vs PRAA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is the stronger pick with 37.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (5. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. (PRTH) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
On forward P/E, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 5. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
Over the past 5 years, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) delivered a total return of -19. 1%, compared to -98. 4% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAA returned -32. 6% versus CXAI's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 82β versus Enovix Corporation's 3. 40β — meaning ENVX is approximately 87% more volatile than PRAA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 36% for CXApp Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Enovix Corporation (ENVX) is pulling ahead at 37.
9% versus -3. 0% for CXApp Inc. (CXAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Priority Technology Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 319. 4% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ENVX leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -492. 6% for Enovix Corporation — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAA leads at 33. 9% versus -557. 0% for ENVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Priority Technology Holdings, Inc.
(PRTH) trades at 5. 5x forward P/E versus 26. 4x for PRA Group, Inc. — 20. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ENVX: 165. 3% to $17. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CXAI or PRTH or ENVX or PRAA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PRA Group, Inc.
(PRAA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. CXApp Inc. (CXAI) carries a higher beta of 2. 90 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRAA: -32. 6%, CXAI: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXAI and PRTH and ENVX and PRAA?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXAI (Technology) and PRTH (Technology) and ENVX (Industrials) and PRAA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CXAI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRTH is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVX is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.