Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
Telecommunications Services
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $317M | $1.56B | $32M | $853M | $517M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $73M | $209.36B | $244M | $603M | $274M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $4.11B | $-67M | $40M | $6M |
| Gross Margin | 71.5% | 37.3% | 62.2% | 28.0% | 61.1% |
| Operating Margin | 5.5% | -2.2% | -9.6% | 10.8% | 1.9% |
| Forward P/E | 26.0x | 27.4x | — | 15.0x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $701M | $392M | $86M | $17M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $103M | $95M | $113M | $20M |
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) | 100 | 164.4 | +64.4% |
| Bandwidth Inc. (BAND) | 100 | 43.9 | -56.1% |
| LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) | 100 | 0.5 | -99.5% |
| Magic Software Ente… (MGIC) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
| Ooma, Inc. (OOMA) | 100 | 151.5 | +51.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CXDO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
- 6.4% 10Y total return vs MGIC's 222.0%
- 12.0% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.86
- +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MGIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 1.46, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.62x
- 6.6% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
- 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- 7.4% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 16.2% vs -6.6%
OOMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 18.7%, current ratio 0.93x
- Lower P/E (14.8x vs 15.0x)
- Beta 1.01 vs LPSN's 2.05
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.0% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (14.8x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.6% margin vs LPSN's -27.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs LPSN's 2.05 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.4% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 16.2% vs -6.6% |
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CXDO leads in 2 of 6 categories
BAND leads 1 • LPSN leads 0 • MGIC leads 0 • OOMA leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 2875.1x CXDO's $73M. MGIC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $73M | $209.4B | $244M | $603M | $274M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $7M | -$4.6B | -$562,000 | $87M | $20M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $4.1B | -$67M | $40M | $6M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $1.8B | -$43M | $64M | -$42M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.5% | +37.3% | +62.2% | +28.0% | +61.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.5% | -2.2% | -9.6% | +10.8% | +1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +2.0% | -27.6% | +6.6% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +0.8% | -17.4% | +10.7% | -15.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +29.0% | +1197.2% | -19.0% | +13.1% | +14.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -46.9% | +39.8% | +79.4% | +17.6% | — |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAND and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, MGIC trades at a 72% valuation discount to OOMA's 82.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGIC's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 50.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $317M | $1.6B | $32M | $853M | $517M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $287M | $2.2B | $329M | $827M | $514M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.13x | -113.15x | -0.22x | 23.17x | 82.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.96x | 27.36x | — | 14.98x | 14.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.98x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.91x | 50.39x | — | 10.07x | 27.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.65x | 2.07x | 0.13x | 1.54x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 3.65x | — | 2.83x | 5.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 34.17x | 0.02x | — | 11.64x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MGIC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for BAND. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | +4.0% | — | +13.4% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.7% | +1.7% | -12.4% | +7.4% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.2% | -1.2% | -6.6% | +16.2% | +3.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.9% | -1.6% | -5.8% | +16.3% | +3.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 1.75x | — | 0.29x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $598M | $297M | -$27M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $103M | $95M | $113M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $701M | $392M | $86M | $17M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 283.68x | -10.30x | 0.20x | 11.90x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CXDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +47.5% | +242.2% | -31.1% | -33.3% | +70.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +86.3% | +253.6% | -77.1% | +28.3% | +48.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +526.9% | +330.6% | -95.8% | +36.5% | +60.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | -61.3% | -99.7% | +24.4% | +15.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +636.8% | +143.3% | -97.0% | +222.0% | +194.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +84.4% | +62.7% | -65.4% | +10.9% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
OOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CXDO currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.86x | 1.86x | 2.05x | 1.46x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.84 | $49.25 | $21.60 | $28.00 | $19.26 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.07 | $12.57 | $2.37 | $13.85 | $9.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +98.8% | +12.4% | +62.1% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 84.3 | 90.4 | 40.3 | 30.7 | 82.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 243K | 670K | 148K | 34K | 266K |
Analyst Outlook
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CXDO as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", MGIC as "Buy", OOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for MGIC (target: $19) vs -5.5% for BAND (target: $46). MGIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $46.00 | — | $18.50 | $18.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 15 | — | 6 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.20 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
CXDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BAND leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
On trailing P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Ooma, Inc. at 82. 6x. On forward P/E, Ooma, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ooma, Inc.
(OOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 103% more volatile than OOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ooma, Inc. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
Crexendo, Inc.
(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGIC leads at 11. 1% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Ooma, Inc.
(OOMA) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Bandwidth Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGIC: 6. 4% to $18. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?
In this comparison, MGIC (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. CXDO, BAND, LPSN, OOMA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
(MGIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +222. 0% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGIC: +222. 0%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CXDO and BAND and LPSN and MGIC and OOMA?
These companies operate in different sectors (CXDO (Communication Services) and BAND (Technology) and LPSN (Technology) and MGIC (Technology) and OOMA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
MGIC pays a dividend while CXDO, BAND, LPSN, OOMA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 7%
- Gross Margin > 36%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.