Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$317M
5Y Perf.+64.4%
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.56B
5Y Perf.-56.1%
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$32M
5Y Perf.-99.5%
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNASDAQ • IL
Market Cap$853M
5Y Perf.+70.9%
OOMA
Ooma, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$517M
5Y Perf.+51.5%

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
CXDO logoCXDO
BAND logoBAND
LPSN logoLPSN
MGIC logoMGIC
OOMA logoOOMA
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesSoftware - InfrastructureSoftware - ApplicationInformation Technology ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$317M$1.56B$32M$853M$517M
Revenue (TTM)$73M$209.36B$244M$603M$274M
Net Income (TTM)$4M$4.11B$-67M$40M$6M
Gross Margin71.5%37.3%62.2%28.0%61.1%
Operating Margin5.5%-2.2%-9.6%10.8%1.9%
Forward P/E26.0x27.4x15.0x14.8x
Total Debt$1M$701M$392M$86M$17M
Cash & Equiv.$31M$103M$95M$113M$20M

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

CXDO
BAND
LPSN
MGIC
OOMA
StockMay 20May 26Return
Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO)100164.4+64.4%
Bandwidth Inc. (BAND)10043.9-56.1%
LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN)1000.5-99.5%
Magic Software Ente… (MGIC)100170.9+70.9%
Ooma, Inc. (OOMA)100151.5+51.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: MGIC leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. Ooma, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CXDO and BAND also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
CXDO
Crexendo, Inc.
The Growth Play

CXDO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 12.0%, EPS growth 186.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.0%
  • 6.4% 10Y total return vs MGIC's 222.0%
  • 12.0% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
BAND
Bandwidth Inc.
The Income Pick

BAND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.86
  • +253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Best for: income & stability
LPSN
LivePerson, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LPSN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
MGIC
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.
The Defensive Pick

MGIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.

  • Beta 1.46, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.62x
  • 6.6% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
  • 1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
  • 7.4% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 16.2% vs -6.6%
Best for: defensive
OOMA
Ooma, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

OOMA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.01, Low D/E 18.7%, current ratio 0.93x
  • Lower P/E (14.8x vs 15.0x)
  • Beta 1.01 vs LPSN's 2.05
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCXDO logoCXDO12.0% revenue growth vs LPSN's -22.0%
ValueOOMA logoOOMALower P/E (14.8x vs 15.0x)
Quality / MarginsMGIC logoMGIC6.6% margin vs LPSN's -27.6%
Stability / SafetyOOMA logoOOMABeta 1.01 vs LPSN's 2.05
DividendsMGIC logoMGIC1.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)BAND logoBAND+253.6% vs LPSN's -77.1%
Efficiency (ROA)MGIC logoMGIC7.4% ROA vs LPSN's -12.4%, ROIC 16.2% vs -6.6%

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

CXDOCrexendo, Inc.
FY 2024
Cloud Telecommunications Segment
100.0%$37M
BANDBandwidth Inc.
FY 2025
CPaaS, Usage-Based Fees
73.8%$415M
CPaaS, Service Fees
26.2%$147M
LPSNLivePerson, Inc.
FY 2025
Hosted Services - Business
85.2%$208M
Professional Services
14.8%$36M
MGICMagic Software Enterprises Ltd.
FY 2021
ItProfessionalServicesMember
80.1%$385M
SoftwareServicesMember
19.9%$96M
OOMAOoma, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription And Services Revenue
92.9%$239M
Product And Other Revenue
7.1%$18M

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCXDOLAGGINGOOMA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

BAND is the larger business by revenue, generating $209.4B annually — 2875.1x CXDO's $73M. MGIC is the more profitable business, keeping 6.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPSN's -27.6%. On growth, BAND holds the edge at +1197.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$73M$209.4B$244M$603M$274M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$7M-$4.6B-$562,000$87M$20M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4M$4.1B-$67M$40M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$10M$1.8B-$43M$64M-$42M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+71.5%+37.3%+62.2%+28.0%+61.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+5.5%-2.2%-9.6%+10.8%+1.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+6.1%+2.0%-27.6%+6.6%+2.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.8%+0.8%-17.4%+10.7%-15.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.0%+1197.2%-19.0%+13.1%+14.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-46.9%+39.8%+79.4%+17.6%
Evenly matched — CXDO and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BAND and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 23.2x trailing earnings, MGIC trades at a 72% valuation discount to OOMA's 82.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MGIC's 10.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BAND's 50.4x.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$317M$1.6B$32M$853M$517M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$287M$2.2B$329M$827M$514M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS61.13x-113.15x-0.22x23.17x82.61x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.96x27.36x14.98x14.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.98x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple35.91x50.39x10.07x27.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.65x2.07x0.13x1.54x1.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.85x3.65x2.83x5.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.17x0.02x11.64x
Evenly matched — BAND and MGIC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MGIC delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $4 for BAND. CXDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BAND's 1.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CXDO scores 7/9 vs BAND's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+7.0%+4.0%+13.4%+7.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+5.7%+1.7%-12.4%+7.4%+3.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+10.2%-1.2%-6.6%+16.2%+3.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.9%-1.6%-5.8%+16.3%+3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.02x1.75x0.29x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$30M$598M$297M-$27M-$3M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$31M$103M$95M$113M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$701M$392M$86M$17M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense283.68x-10.30x0.20x11.90x
CXDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CXDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CXDO five years ago would be worth $18,242 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $35 for LPSN. Over the past 12 months, BAND leads with a +253.6% total return vs LPSN's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CXDO at 84.4% vs LPSN's -65.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+47.5%+242.2%-31.1%-33.3%+70.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+86.3%+253.6%-77.1%+28.3%+48.7%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+526.9%+330.6%-95.8%+36.5%+60.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+82.4%-61.3%-99.7%+24.4%+15.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+636.8%+143.3%-97.0%+222.0%+194.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+84.4%+62.7%-65.4%+10.9%+17.2%
CXDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

OOMA is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPSN's 2.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CXDO currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs LPSN's 12.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.86x1.86x2.05x1.46x1.01x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$9.84$49.25$21.60$28.00$19.26
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.07$12.57$2.37$13.85$9.79
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.4%+98.8%+12.4%+62.1%+98.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10084.390.440.330.782.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded243K670K148K34K266K
Evenly matched — CXDO and OOMA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CXDO as "Buy", BAND as "Buy", MGIC as "Buy", OOMA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.4% upside for MGIC (target: $19) vs -5.5% for BAND (target: $46). MGIC is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricCXDO logoCXDOCrexendo, Inc.BAND logoBANDBandwidth Inc.LPSN logoLPSNLivePerson, Inc.MGIC logoMGICMagic Software En…OOMA logoOOMAOoma, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$46.00$18.50$18.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts615615
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises010
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%+3.2%
BAND leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CXDO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). BAND leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.

Best OverallCrexendo, Inc. (CXDO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

CXDO vs BAND vs LPSN vs MGIC vs OOMA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is the stronger pick with 12. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (MGIC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (15. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

On trailing P/E, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.

(MGIC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus Ooma, Inc. at 82. 6x. On forward P/E, Ooma, Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

Over the past 5 years, Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) delivered a total return of +82. 4%, compared to -99. 7% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CXDO returned +636. 8% versus LPSN's -97. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Ooma, Inc.

(OOMA) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus LivePerson, Inc. 's 2. 05β — meaning LPSN is approximately 103% more volatile than OOMA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Crexendo, Inc. (CXDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 175% for Bandwidth Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is pulling ahead at 12. 0% versus -22. 0% for LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Ooma, Inc. grew EPS 188. 5% year-over-year, compared to -79. 2% for Bandwidth Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CXDO leads at 22. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

Crexendo, Inc.

(CXDO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -27. 6% for LivePerson, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MGIC leads at 11. 1% versus -9. 6% for LPSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CXDO leads at 62. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Ooma, Inc.

(OOMA) trades at 14. 8x forward P/E versus 27. 4x for Bandwidth Inc. — 12. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MGIC: 6. 4% to $18. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA?

In this comparison, MGIC (1.

2% yield) pays a dividend. CXDO, BAND, LPSN, OOMA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is CXDO or BAND or LPSN or MGIC or OOMA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Magic Software Enterprises Ltd.

(MGIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +222. 0% 10Y return). LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 05 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGIC: +222. 0%, LPSN: -97. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between CXDO and BAND and LPSN and MGIC and OOMA?

These companies operate in different sectors (CXDO (Communication Services) and BAND (Technology) and LPSN (Technology) and MGIC (Technology) and OOMA (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

MGIC pays a dividend while CXDO, BAND, LPSN, OOMA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

CXDO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BAND

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 59862%
  • Gross Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LPSN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 37%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGIC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OOMA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 36%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform CXDO and BAND and LPSN and MGIC and OOMA on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(CXDO: 29.0% · BAND: 119724.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.