Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $9.47B | $3.84B | $8.76B | $30.33B | $9.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $106M | $1.10B | $4.03B | $16.63B | $8.10B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-830M | $376M | $-185M | $1.39B | $599M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 91.5% | 31.9% | 26.1% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | -6.1% | 7.4% | 11.8% | 13.9% | 12.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 55.6x | 16.0x | 14.0x | 10.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.28B | $52M | $3.07B | $16.17B | $3.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $882M | $178M | $214M | $1.98B | $539M |
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cytokinetics, Incor… (CYTK) | 100 | 371.4 | +271.4% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 98.9 | -1.1% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 119.5 | +19.5% |
| ICON Public Limited… (ICLR) | 100 | 73.9 | -26.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CYTK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs IQV's 166.6%
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 4.53x
- 376.6% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- Beta 0.80 vs ICLR's 1.64
ACAD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs CYTK's -7.8%
- 26.2% ROA vs CYTK's -61.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -305.3%
CRL lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
IQV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.32
- PEG 0.34 vs ICLR's 1.53
ICLR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 16.0x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 376.6% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 16.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs CYTK's -7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs ICLR's 1.64 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.8% vs ICLR's -10.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs CYTK's -61.9%, ROIC 10.0% vs -305.3% |
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories
CYTK leads 2 • ICLR leads 1 • IQV leads 1 • CRL leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACAD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 157.2x CYTK's $106M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CYTK's -7.8%. On growth, CYTK holds the edge at +11.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106M | $1.1B | $4.0B | $16.6B | $8.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$633M | $96M | $824M | $3.5B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$830M | $376M | -$185M | $1.4B | $599M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$549M | $212M | $391M | $2.7B | $996M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +91.5% | +31.9% | +26.1% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -6.1% | +7.4% | +11.8% | +13.9% | +12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.8% | +34.3% | -4.6% | +8.3% | +7.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.2% | +19.4% | +9.7% | +16.1% | +12.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.3% | +9.7% | +1.2% | +8.4% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.8% | -81.8% | -160.0% | +15.0% | -98.7% |
Valuation Metrics
ICLR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.8x trailing earnings, ACAD trades at a 57% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IQV offers better value at 0.56x vs ICLR's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9.5B | $3.8B | $8.8B | $30.3B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.9B | $3.7B | $11.6B | $44.5B | $12.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -11.76x | 9.78x | -61.04x | 22.79x | 13.06x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 55.62x | 16.00x | 13.96x | 10.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.56x | 1.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.71x | 12.75x | 12.98x | 7.92x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 107.59x | 3.58x | 2.18x | 1.86x | 1.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.13x | 2.74x | 4.68x | 1.09x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 36.48x | 16.90x | 14.79x | 8.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-6 for CRL. ACAD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICLR scores 7/9 vs CYTK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +35.6% | -5.7% | +22.1% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -61.9% | +26.2% | -2.5% | +4.7% | +3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | +10.0% | +6.3% | +8.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -50.1% | +10.1% | +8.1% | +11.0% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.95x | 2.44x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $402M | -$126M | $2.9B | $14.2B | $3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $882M | $178M | $214M | $2.0B | $539M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $52M | $3.1B | $16.2B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.39x | — | 4.29x | 3.10x | 3.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CYTK leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CYTK five years ago would be worth $32,896 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,336 for CRL. Over the past 12 months, CYTK leads with a +136.8% total return vs ICLR's -10.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CYTK at 26.0% vs ICLR's -13.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.6% | -14.3% | -12.3% | -20.7% | -34.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +136.8% | +32.3% | +25.7% | +16.6% | -10.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +100.2% | +3.9% | -6.5% | -5.9% | -34.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.0% | +6.6% | -46.6% | -22.8% | -44.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +849.5% | -23.4% | +114.0% | +166.6% | +90.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.0% | +1.3% | -2.2% | -2.0% | -13.1% |
Risk & Volatility
CYTK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CYTK is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ICLR's 1.64 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYTK currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs ICLR's 59.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 1.11x | 1.44x | 1.32x | 1.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $80.20 | $27.81 | $228.88 | $247.05 | $211.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $29.31 | $14.68 | $132.58 | $134.65 | $66.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +80.5% | +77.6% | +72.3% | +59.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.7 | 53.8 | 57.4 | 60.3 | 62.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.3M | 1.7M | 792K | 1.5M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CYTK as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy", ICLR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 55.3% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs 16.2% for CRL (target: $206).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $99.62 | $34.78 | $206.43 | $223.75 | $152.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 37 | 36 | 44 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% | +4.1% | +5.3% |
ACAD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CYTK leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
CYTK vs ACAD vs CRL vs IQV vs ICLR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is the stronger pick with 376.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 8x trailing P/E (55. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
On trailing P/E, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the cheapest at 9. 8x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, ICON Public Limited Company is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: IQVIA Holdings Inc. wins at 0. 34x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
Over the past 5 years, Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) delivered a total return of +229.
0%, compared to -46. 6% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CYTK returned +849. 5% versus ACAD's -23. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 64β — meaning ICLR is approximately 106% more volatile than CYTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is pulling ahead at 376.
6% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACAD leads at 27. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -891. 6% for Cytokinetics, Incorporated — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQV leads at 14. 0% versus -695. 4% for CYTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ACAD leads at 91. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 34x versus ICON Public Limited Company's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 44. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 55. 3% to $34. 78.
08Which pays a better dividend — CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is CYTK or ACAD or CRL or IQV or ICLR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cytokinetics, Incorporated (CYTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), +849. 5% 10Y return). ICON Public Limited Company (ICLR) carries a higher beta of 1. 64 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CYTK: +849. 5%, ICLR: +90. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CYTK and ACAD and CRL and IQV and ICLR?
Both stocks operate in the null sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: CYTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ICLR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.