Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Banks - Regional
Information Technology Services
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Banks - Regional | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $203M | $24.47B | $10.57B | $415M | $30.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $90M | $10.89B | $2.52B | $208M | $21.09B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $382M | $519M | $35M | $3.20B |
| Gross Margin | 54.7% | 38.1% | 44.1% | 51.6% | 60.8% |
| Operating Margin | 7.0% | 17.5% | 26.0% | 23.3% | 24.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.8x | 7.5x | 21.8x | 9.6x | 7.0x |
| Total Debt | $52M | $4.01B | $0.00 | $180M | $29.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $119M | $599M | $102M | $225M | $798M |
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 286.8 | +186.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
| Bankwell Financial … (BWFG) | 100 | 355.9 | +255.9% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
- Beta 0.46, yield 1.8%, current ratio 3015.31x
FIS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 7.2% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5%
BWFG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 175.8% 10Y total return vs CZWI's 157.0%
- NIM 2.9% vs CZWI's 2.9%
- +55.7% vs FISV's -68.8%
FISV is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.20 vs CZWI's 2.32
- Lower P/E (7.0x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.0x vs 9.6x), PEG 0.20 vs 0.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs FISV's 0.94 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +55.7% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 21.0% vs 2.0% |
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
FISV leads 1 • CZWI leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • BWFG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 234.2x CZWI's $90M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $90M | $10.9B | $2.5B | $208M | $21.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $3.8B | $810M | $53M | $7.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $382M | $519M | $35M | $3.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $2.8B | $728M | -$5M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +54.7% | +38.1% | +44.1% | +51.6% | +60.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | +17.5% | +26.0% | +23.3% | +24.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | +3.5% | +20.6% | +16.9% | +15.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.5% | +26.1% | +28.9% | +12.6% | +19.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +8.2% | +8.7% | — | -2.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +63.0% | +92.3% | +12.5% | +2.1% | -29.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FISV leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs CZWI's 2.85x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $203M | $24.5B | $10.6B | $415M | $30.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $136M | $27.9B | $10.5B | $370M | $58.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.44x | 63.00x | 23.40x | 11.71x | 8.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.78x | 7.54x | 21.79x | 9.62x | 7.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.85x | 2.58x | 2.32x | 0.27x | 0.25x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.28x | 7.66x | 13.53x | 7.04x | 6.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 2.29x | 4.45x | 2.00x | 1.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.09x | 1.76x | 5.01x | 1.35x | 1.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.55x | 9.97x | 17.97x | 15.90x | 7.00x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. CZWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.28x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FISV's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CZWI scores 6/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.8% | +2.7% | +24.0% | +12.2% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.8% | +1.1% | +17.0% | +1.1% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.0% | +6.0% | +21.0% | +8.0% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.6% | +6.6% | +22.7% | +4.4% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 0.29x | — | 0.60x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$67M | $3.4B | -$102M | -$45M | $28.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $119M | $599M | $102M | $225M | $798M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $52M | $4.0B | $0 | $180M | $29.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.16x | 4.64x | 122.37x | 0.49x | 6.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CZWI and BWFG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BWFG five years ago would be worth $19,208 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BWFG leads with a +55.7% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +21.5% | -27.3% | -17.8% | +16.1% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.6% | -35.3% | -13.6% | +55.7% | -68.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.0% | -6.6% | -1.0% | +144.3% | -52.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +71.2% | -63.2% | +0.3% | +92.1% | -51.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +157.0% | -13.2% | +94.9% | +175.8% | +9.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +37.5% | -2.2% | -0.3% | +34.7% | -22.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JKHY and BWFG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FISV's 0.94 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BWFG currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.76x | 0.28x | 0.84x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.62 | $82.74 | $193.39 | $53.86 | $191.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.83 | $43.30 | $141.81 | $33.26 | $52.91 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.2% | +57.1% | +75.5% | +96.8% | +29.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.7 | 43.3 | 28.2 | 55.8 | 36.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 40K | 5.5M | 902K | 40K | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CZWI as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy", BWFG as "Buy", FISV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 31.4% for FISV (target: $75). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.45% vs BWFG's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.38 | $203.75 | — | $74.64 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 37 | 22 | 3 | 60 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | +3.5% | +1.5% | +1.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 1 | 32 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.37 | $1.63 | $2.25 | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.1% | 0.0% | +0.3% | +0.3% | +19.4% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FISV leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
CZWI vs FIS vs JKHY vs BWFG vs FISV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Fiserv, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fiserv, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
Over the past 5 years, Bankwell Financial Group, Inc.
(BWFG) delivered a total return of +92. 1%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BWFG returned +175. 8% versus FIS's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Fiserv, Inc. 's 0. 94β — meaning FISV is approximately 232% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 28% versus 113% for Fiserv, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bankwell Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 261. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FISV leads at 59. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. 's 2. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) trades at 7. 0x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 14. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV?
In this comparison, FIS (3.
5% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield), BWFG (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is CZWI or FIS or JKHY or BWFG or FISV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, FISV: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between CZWI and FIS and JKHY and BWFG and FISV?
These companies operate in different sectors (CZWI (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology) and BWFG (Financial Services) and FISV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BWFG is a small-cap deep-value stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CZWI, FIS, JKHY, BWFG pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.