Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Software - Application | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $375M | $5.29B | $771M | $143M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.89B | $1.10B | $2.66B | $319M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $422M | $171M | $-86M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 72.7% | 54.4% | 61.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.7% | 14.2% | 2.7% | -11.1% |
| Forward P/E | 8.3x | 38.4x | 18.1x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.82B | $94M | $333M | $84M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $440M | $1.04B | $1.77B | $31M |
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Youdao, Inc. (DAO) | 100 | 136.1 | +36.1% |
| Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) | 100 | 81.0 | -19.0% |
| TAL Education Group (TAL) | 100 | 187.8 | +87.8% |
| Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) | 100 | 1.4 | -98.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DAO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in value and stability.
- Better valuation composite
- Beta 0.78 vs CHGG's 2.97
DUOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 38.4% margin vs CHGG's -26.9%
- 22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4%
TAL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.96
- Rev growth 51.2%, EPS growth 24.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -20.0%
- 27.3% 10Y total return vs DAO's -4.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 8.9%, current ratio 2.86x
CHGG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +79.3% vs DUOL's -77.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.2% revenue growth vs CHGG's -39.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 38.4% margin vs CHGG's -26.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs CHGG's 2.97 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +79.3% vs DUOL's -77.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.6% ROA vs CHGG's -26.3%, ROIC 40.8% vs -13.4% |
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories
TAL leads 2 • DAO leads 1 • CHGG leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DUOL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.9B annually — 18.5x CHGG's $319M. DUOL is the more profitable business, keeping 38.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CHGG's -26.9%. On growth, TAL holds the edge at +38.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.9B | $1.1B | $2.7B | $319M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $193M | $167M | $72M | $11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $422M | $171M | -$86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $423M | $441M | -$25M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +72.7% | +54.4% | +61.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +14.2% | +2.7% | -11.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +38.4% | +6.5% | -26.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +38.5% | +16.6% | -8.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.0% | +26.5% | +38.7% | -47.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | +29.2% | -21.4% | +101.2% |
Valuation Metrics
TAL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, TAL trades at a 32% valuation discount to DUOL's 13.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CHGG's 12.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DUOL's 29.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $375M | $5.3B | $771M | $143M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $579M | $4.4B | -$667M | $196M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 13.26x | 9.05x | -1.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.25x | 38.44x | 18.12x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.74x | 29.01x | -16.38x | 12.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.43x | 5.10x | 0.34x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.07x | 0.20x | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.32x | 2.70x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DUOL delivers a 33.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-63 for CHGG. DUOL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHGG's 0.70x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHGG scores 6/9 vs DUOL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +33.6% | +4.7% | -62.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.4% | +22.6% | +3.1% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +40.8% | -0.3% | -13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +7.9% | -0.2% | -26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x | 0.09x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.4B | -$943M | -$1.6B | $53M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $440M | $1.0B | $1.8B | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.8B | $94M | $333M | $84M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.90x | — | — | -525.53x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TAL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DUOL five years ago would be worth $8,173 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $150 for CHGG. Over the past 12 months, CHGG leads with a +79.3% total return vs DUOL's -77.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TAL at 26.7% vs CHGG's -49.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | -35.6% | -0.8% | +30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.6% | -77.1% | +23.9% | +79.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.1% | -13.8% | +103.2% | -87.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.5% | -18.3% | -79.7% | -98.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.0% | -18.3% | +27.3% | -70.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.4% | -4.8% | +26.7% | -49.8% |
Risk & Volatility
DAO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DAO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CHGG's 2.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DAO currently trades 92.6% from its 52-week high vs DUOL's 20.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 1.20x | 0.96x | 2.97x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.96 | $544.93 | $13.37 | $1.90 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.00 | $87.89 | $9.04 | $0.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.6% | +20.8% | +85.3% | +67.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.3 | 52.3 | 52.3 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 66K | 2.6M | 3.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
CHGG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DAO as "Buy", DUOL as "Hold", TAL as "Hold", CHGG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2276.6% upside for CHGG (target: $30) vs -45.8% for DAO (target: $7).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $6.50 | $220.56 | $18.00 | $30.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 22 | 28 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | 0.0% |
DUOL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TAL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
DAO vs DUOL vs TAL vs CHGG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the stronger pick with 51.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). TAL Education Group (TAL) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Youdao, Inc. (DAO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
On trailing P/E, TAL Education Group (TAL) is the cheapest at 9.
0x versus Duolingo, Inc. at 13. 3x. On forward P/E, Youdao, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
Over the past 5 years, Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) delivered a total return of -18. 3%, compared to -98. 5% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TAL returned +27. 3% versus CHGG's -70. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Chegg, Inc. 's 2. 97β — meaning CHGG is approximately 281% more volatile than DAO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duolingo, Inc. (DUOL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 70% for Chegg, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TAL Education Group (TAL) is pulling ahead at 51.
2% versus -39. 0% for Chegg, Inc. (CHGG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TAL Education Group grew EPS 24. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Youdao, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUOL leads at 41. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
Duolingo, Inc.
(DUOL) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 9% net margin versus -27. 4% for Chegg, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUOL leads at 13. 1% versus -16. 8% for CHGG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUOL leads at 72. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) trades at 8. 3x forward P/E versus 38. 4x for Duolingo, Inc. — 30. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CHGG: 2276. 6% to $30. 42.
08Which pays a better dividend — DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DAO or DUOL or TAL or CHGG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Youdao, Inc.
(DAO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78)). Chegg, Inc. (CHGG) carries a higher beta of 2. 97 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DAO: -4. 0%, CHGG: -70. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DAO and DUOL and TAL and CHGG?
These companies operate in different sectors (DAO (Consumer Defensive) and DUOL (Technology) and TAL (Consumer Defensive) and CHGG (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DAO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DUOL is a small-cap high-growth stock; TAL is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHGG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.