Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Food Distribution
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries | Specialty Retail | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $46.38B | $1.04T | $337.62B | $34.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $37.37B | $703.06B | $49.28B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5.49B | $22.91B | $13.70B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | 24.9% | 61.7% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 27.9% | 4.1% | 29.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | 44.7x | 24.1x | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $24.40B | $67.09B | $45.49B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.20B | $10.73B | $10.27B | $1.07B |
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diageo plc (DEO) | 100 | 59.3 | -40.7% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 168.0 | +68.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 132.1 | +32.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DEO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.37, yield 4.9%, current ratio 1.63x
- 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8%
- 14.7% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 9.6% vs 15.7%
WMT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 4.7%, EPS growth 13.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.3%
- 499.5% 10Y total return vs KO's 111.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.12, Low D/E 67.2%, current ratio 0.79x
KO is the clearest fit if your priority is quality.
- 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1%
SYY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.29 vs WMT's 4.06
- Lower P/E (15.9x vs 24.1x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.16
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.7% revenue growth vs DEO's -0.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 24.1x), PEG 0.29 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.8% margin vs SYY's 2.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SYY's 0.47, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SYY's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs DEO's -25.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.7% ROA vs SYY's 6.4%, ROIC 9.6% vs 15.7% |
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories
KO leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • DEO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 18.8x DEO's $37.4B. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SYY's 2.1%. On growth, KO holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $37.4B | $703.1B | $49.3B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11.6B | $42.8B | $15.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.5B | $22.9B | $13.7B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $7.7B | $15.3B | $12.6B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | +24.9% | +61.7% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +4.1% | +29.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +3.3% | +27.8% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.6% | +2.2% | +25.5% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.1% | +5.8% | +12.1% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.1% | +35.1% | +18.2% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.5x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 59% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.36x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $46.4B | $1.04T | $337.6B | $34.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.6B | $1.09T | $372.8B | $48.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.68x | 47.69x | 25.80x | 19.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.82x | 44.71x | 24.11x | 15.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.64x | 4.33x | 2.31x | 0.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.33x | 24.85x | 25.17x | 11.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.29x | 1.46x | 7.04x | 0.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.53x | 10.45x | 9.87x | 19.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.27x | 24.97x | 63.75x | 19.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $22 for WMT. WMT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KO scores 7/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +54.0% | +22.3% | +41.1% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +14.7% | +7.9% | +13.1% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | +14.7% | +15.8% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.7% | +17.5% | +17.3% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.85x | 0.67x | 1.33x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22.2B | $56.4B | $35.2B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.2B | $10.7B | $10.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24.4B | $67.1B | $45.5B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.71x | 11.85x | 10.70x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,612 for DEO. Over the past 12 months, WMT leads with a +32.7% total return vs DEO's -25.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs DEO's -20.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.3% | +15.7% | +14.3% | +1.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -25.1% | +32.7% | +11.2% | +6.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.3% | +160.5% | +31.9% | +4.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.9% | +186.9% | +61.1% | -3.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.0% | +499.5% | +111.2% | +82.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.3% | +37.6% | +9.7% | +1.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SYY's 0.47 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs DEO's 71.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.12x | -0.09x | 0.47x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $116.69 | $134.69 | $82.00 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $72.46 | $91.89 | $65.35 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.5% | +96.7% | +95.7% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 55.9 | 61.7 | 41.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.8M | 17.2M | 13.4M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DEO and WMT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DEO as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for DEO (target: $124) vs 5.3% for WMT (target: $137). For income investors, DEO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.95% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $124.00 | $137.04 | $85.71 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 35 | 64 | 48 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.9% | +0.7% | +2.6% | +2.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 37 | 35 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.13 | $0.94 | $2.04 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +0.2% | +3.6% |
SYY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
DEO vs WMT vs KO vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger pick with 4. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 19. 5x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 19.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Sysco Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -43. 9% for Diageo plc (DEO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WMT returned +499. 5% versus DEO's +10. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
09β versus Sysco Corporation's 0. 47β — meaning SYY is approximately -633% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Walmart Inc. (WMT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 67% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is pulling ahead at 4. 7% versus -0. 1% for Diageo plc (DEO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Coca-Cola Company grew EPS 23. 6% year-over-year, compared to -38. 7% for Diageo plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DEO leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.
3% net margin versus 2. 2% for Sysco Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 3. 8% for SYY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KO leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 29x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Sysco Corporation (SYY) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 28. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DEO: 48. 6% to $124. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DEO or WMT or KO or SYY?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Diageo plc (DEO) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 0. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT).
09Is DEO or WMT or KO or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SYY: +82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DEO and WMT and KO and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DEO is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.