Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $21.12B | $1712.35T | $21.24B | $5.90B | $2.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $11.28B | $0.00 | $14.14B | $1.56B | $190M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $-168M | $942M | $153M | $21M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | — | 27.8% | 65.4% | 98.6% |
| Operating Margin | 14.3% | — | 11.0% | 12.3% | 5.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.8x | — | 14.5x | 24.8x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $6.92B | $22M | $7.20B | $70M | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $420M | $194M | $532M | $1.12B | $70M |
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quest Diagnostics I… (DGX) | 100 | 161.3 | +61.3% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
| Labcorp Holdings In… (LH) | 100 | 171.3 | +71.3% |
| Alkermes plc (ALKS) | 100 | 216.4 | +116.4% |
| Soleno Therapeutics… (SLNO) | 100 | 21.0 | -79.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DGX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 1.6%
- 181.3% 10Y total return vs ALKS's -11.0%
- Beta 0.07, yield 1.6%, current ratio 1.04x
- Beta 0.07 vs DBVT's 1.26
DBVT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +110.4% vs SLNO's -29.1%
LH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 18.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
Among these 5 stocks, ALKS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SLNO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 5.80x
- 113.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 14.5x)
- 11.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 113.2% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 14.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.0% margin vs DBVT's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs DBVT's 1.26 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs LH's 1.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +110.4% vs SLNO's -29.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.3% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SLNO leads in 1 of 6 categories
ALKS leads 1 • DGX leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • LH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLNO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LH and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $14.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 11.0% (SLNO) to 6.7% (LH). On growth, ALKS holds the edge at +28.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11.3B | $0 | $14.1B | $1.6B | $190M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.9B | -$112M | $2.2B | $212M | $12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | -$168M | $942M | $153M | $21M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.3B | -$151M | $1.4B | $392M | $47M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | — | +27.8% | +65.4% | +98.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | — | +11.0% | +12.3% | +5.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | — | +6.7% | +9.8% | +11.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.8% | — | +9.8% | +25.1% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | — | +5.8% | +28.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +15.5% | +91.5% | +32.9% | -4.1% | +163.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DBVT and LH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.8x trailing earnings, DGX trades at a 84% valuation discount to SLNO's 135.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LH's 12.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLNO's 158.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.1B | $1712.35T | $21.2B | $5.9B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.6B | $1712.35T | $27.9B | $4.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.81x | -0.76x | 24.67x | 24.76x | 135.77x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.77x | — | 14.45x | — | 13.41x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.71x | — | 12.70x | 17.25x | 158.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.91x | — | 1.52x | 4.00x | 14.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.96x | 0.66x | 2.50x | 3.28x | 6.39x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.54x | — | 17.61x | 12.28x | 59.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ALKS leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DGX delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. SLNO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DGX's 0.95x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DGX scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.8% | -130.2% | +10.9% | +8.8% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.3% | -89.0% | +5.1% | +5.4% | +4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | — | +7.8% | +18.9% | +3.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.5% | -145.7% | +9.9% | +14.2% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.95x | 0.13x | 0.83x | 0.04x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.5B | -$172M | $6.7B | -$1.0B | -$67M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $420M | $194M | $532M | $1.1B | $70M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.9B | $22M | $7.2B | $70M | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.26x | -189.82x | 6.22x | 32.30x | 4.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — ALKS and SLNO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALKS five years ago would be worth $16,091 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,090 for DBVT. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +110.4% total return vs SLNO's -29.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLNO at 36.1% vs ALKS's 4.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.8% | +4.9% | +2.8% | +25.3% | +12.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.9% | +110.4% | +6.1% | +16.5% | -29.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.5% | +19.7% | +39.4% | +14.5% | +152.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.7% | -69.1% | +12.6% | +60.9% | -36.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +181.3% | -87.0% | +150.7% | -11.0% | -87.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +6.2% | +11.7% | +4.6% | +36.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DGX and ALKS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DGX is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DBVT's 1.26 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALKS currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs SLNO's 58.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.07x | 1.26x | 0.52x | 1.06x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $213.50 | $26.18 | $293.72 | $36.60 | $90.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $164.65 | $7.53 | $239.67 | $25.17 | $29.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.4% | +76.3% | +87.9% | +96.7% | +58.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.1 | 48.1 | 40.3 | 60.2 | 77.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 841K | 252K | 579K | 2.3M | 3.8M |
Analyst Outlook
DGX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DGX as "Hold", DBVT as "Buy", LH as "Buy", ALKS as "Buy", SLNO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 131.8% upside for DBVT (target: $46) vs 15.6% for DGX (target: $221). For income investors, DGX offers the higher dividend yield at 1.64% vs LH's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $220.57 | $46.33 | $311.33 | $44.00 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 15 | 35 | 28 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — | +1.1% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.12 | — | $2.87 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.1% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +0.5% | +3.6% |
SLNO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). ALKS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
DGX vs DBVT vs LH vs ALKS vs SLNO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is the stronger pick with 11.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) offers the better valuation at 21. 8x trailing P/E (17. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
On trailing P/E, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is the cheapest at 21.
8x versus Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. at 135. 8x. On forward P/E, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
Over the past 5 years, Alkermes plc (ALKS) delivered a total return of +60.
9%, compared to -69. 1% for DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DGX returned +181. 3% versus SLNO's -87. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
07β versus DBV Technologies S. A. 's 1. 26β — meaning DBVT is approximately 1613% more volatile than DGX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. (SLNO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 95% for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is pulling ahead at 11.
8% versus -5. 2% for Alkermes plc (ALKS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Soleno Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 108. 9% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALKS leads at 9. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
Alkermes plc (ALKS) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
4% net margin versus 0. 0% for DBV Technologies S. A. — meaning it keeps 16. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ALKS leads at 17. 2% versus 0. 0% for DBVT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLNO leads at 98. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Soleno Therapeutics, Inc.
(SLNO) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 8x for Quest Diagnostics Incorporated — 4. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DBVT: 131. 8% to $46. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO?
In this comparison, DGX (1.
6% yield), LH (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. DBVT, ALKS, SLNO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DGX or DBVT or LH or ALKS or SLNO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Quest Diagnostics Incorporated (DGX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
07), 1. 6% yield, +181. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DGX: +181. 3%, DBVT: -87. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DGX and DBVT and LH and ALKS and SLNO?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
DGX, LH pay a dividend while DBVT, ALKS, SLNO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.