DIN vs MCD vs YUM vs EAT vs QSR

For growth investors, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the stronger pick with 21. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (13. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate McDonald's Corporation (MCD) a "Buy" — based on 62 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is the cheapest at 17. 6x versus Restaurant Brands International Inc. at 33. 7x. On forward P/E, Dine Brands Global, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Brinker International, Inc. wins at 0. 20x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 81x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) delivered a total return of +125. 8%, compared to -62. 9% for Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EAT returned +229. 9% versus DIN's -41. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

11β versus Dine Brands Global, Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning DIN is approximately 1005% more volatile than MCD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 5% for Brinker International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Brinker International, Inc.

(EAT) is pulling ahead at 21. 9% versus 3. 7% for McDonald's Corporation (MCD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brinker International, Inc. grew EPS 144. 7% year-over-year, compared to -73. 5% for Dine Brands Global, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, QSR leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus 1. 9% for Dine Brands Global, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MCD leads at 46. 1% versus 9. 5% for EAT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MCD leads at 57. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus McDonald's Corporation's 2. 81x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dine Brands Global, Inc. (DIN) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 23. 3x for Yum! Brands, Inc. — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DIN: 28. 4% to $36. 33.

In this comparison, DIN (7.

7% yield), QSR (3. 1% yield), MCD (2. 5% yield), YUM (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. EAT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, McDonald's Corporation (MCD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

11), 2. 5% yield, +157. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MCD: +157. 7%, EAT: +229. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: DIN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MCD is a large-cap quality compounder stock; YUM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EAT is a small-cap high-growth stock; QSR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. DIN, MCD, YUM, QSR pay a dividend while EAT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.