Software - Application
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $766M | $2.97T | $348.25B | $554.04B | $191.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $94M | $318.27B | $49.28B | $67.36B | $36.80B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $14M | $125.22B | $13.70B | $17.09B | $7.04B |
| Gross Margin | 38.6% | 68.3% | 61.7% | 65.8% | 73.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.0% | 46.8% | 29.3% | 30.8% | 26.7% |
| Forward P/E | 6.8x | 23.8x | 24.7x | 25.7x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $23M | $112.18B | $45.49B | $156.19B | $8.07B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $30.24B | $10.27B | $31.29B | $8.22B |
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily Journal Corpo… (DJCO) | 100 | 206.0 | +106.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 196.4 | +96.4% |
| The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO) | 100 | 181.1 | +81.1% |
| Oracle Corporation (ORCL) | 100 | 348.5 | +248.5% |
| SAP SE (SAP) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DJCO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 25.4%, EPS growth 43.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- PEG 0.07 vs ORCL's 5.06
- 25.4% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
- Lower P/E (6.8x vs 25.7x), PEG 0.07 vs 5.06
MSFT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, Low D/E 32.7%, current ratio 1.35x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- 39.3% margin vs DJCO's 14.8%
- Beta 0.84 vs ORCL's 1.68, lower leverage
KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 56 yrs, beta -0.20, yield 2.5%
- 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
ORCL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 432.8% 10Y total return vs MSFT's 7.5%
Among these 5 stocks, SAP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 25.4% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.8x vs 25.7x), PEG 0.07 vs 5.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.3% margin vs DJCO's 14.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs ORCL's 1.68, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs ORCL's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.2% vs SAP's -43.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.2% ROA vs DJCO's 2.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs 2.5% |
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 1 • SAP leads 1 • DJCO leads 1 • ORCL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSFT is the larger business by revenue, generating $318.3B annually — 3383.2x DJCO's $94M. MSFT is the more profitable business, keeping 39.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DJCO's 14.8%. On growth, DJCO holds the edge at +25.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $94M | $318.3B | $49.3B | $67.4B | $36.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $192.6B | $15.5B | $28.7B | $11.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $14M | $125.2B | $13.7B | $17.1B | $7.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $14M | $72.9B | $12.6B | -$23.7B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.6% | +68.3% | +61.7% | +65.8% | +73.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.0% | +46.8% | +29.3% | +30.8% | +26.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.8% | +39.3% | +27.8% | +25.4% | +19.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | +22.9% | +25.5% | -35.2% | +22.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.0% | +18.3% | +12.1% | +20.6% | +3.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -177.5% | +23.4% | +18.2% | +21.8% | +15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SAP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 6.8x trailing earnings, DJCO trades at a 79% valuation discount to ORCL's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), DJCO offers better value at 0.07x vs ORCL's 6.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $766M | $2.97T | $348.2B | $554.0B | $191.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $769M | $3.05T | $383.5B | $678.9B | $191.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 6.83x | 29.31x | 26.62x | 33.04x | 23.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.79x | 24.75x | 25.73x | 22.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.07x | 1.56x | 2.38x | 6.50x | 3.58x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 66.51x | 18.76x | 25.89x | 23.64x | 14.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.74x | 10.54x | 7.26x | 8.23x | 4.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.96x | 8.69x | 10.18x | 13.04x | 3.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 57.52x | 41.47x | 65.76x | — | 20.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — DJCO and MSFT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ORCL delivers a 49.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $50 in annual profit, vs $4 for DJCO. DJCO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ORCL's 3.63x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SAP scores 9/9 vs ORCL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.8% | +33.1% | +41.1% | +49.8% | +15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.7% | +19.2% | +13.1% | +7.7% | +9.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.5% | +24.9% | +15.8% | +11.0% | +16.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +29.7% | +17.3% | +11.7% | +18.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.33x | 1.33x | 3.63x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | $81.9B | $35.2B | $124.9B | -$149M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $30.2B | $10.3B | $31.3B | $8.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $23M | $112.2B | $45.5B | $156.2B | $8.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 114.24x | 55.65x | 10.70x | 5.25x | 8.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DJCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ORCL five years ago would be worth $24,569 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,282 for SAP. Over the past 12 months, DJCO leads with a +40.2% total return vs SAP's -43.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DJCO at 24.3% vs MSFT's 5.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.9% | -15.1% | +18.6% | -1.1% | -29.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +40.2% | -15.8% | +17.7% | -7.8% | -43.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.0% | +17.6% | +42.6% | +56.4% | +25.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +60.5% | +63.1% | +145.7% | +22.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +171.7% | +753.0% | +118.2% | +432.8% | +145.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.3% | +5.6% | +12.6% | +16.1% | +7.9% |
Risk & Volatility
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ORCL's 1.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs SAP's 52.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 0.84x | -0.20x | 1.68x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $674.75 | $555.45 | $84.04 | $345.72 | $313.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $348.63 | $356.28 | $65.35 | $134.57 | $158.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +82.4% | +72.0% | +96.3% | +55.7% | +52.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.9 | 37.0 | 60.8 | 42.1 | 39.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 43K | 33.7M | 12.7M | 24.4M | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSFT as "Buy", KO as "Buy", ORCL as "Buy", SAP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 46.5% upside for SAP (target: $241) vs 6.5% for KO (target: $86). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.52% vs MSFT's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $551.96 | $86.13 | $253.50 | $240.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 82 | 48 | 86 | 43 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +2.5% | +1.0% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 21 | 56 | 17 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.23 | $2.04 | $1.99 | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.6% | +0.2% | +0.0% | +1.1% |
KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). MSFT leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
DJCO vs MSFT vs KO vs ORCL vs SAP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) is the stronger pick with 25.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) offers the better valuation at 6. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) a "Buy" — based on 82 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
On trailing P/E, Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) is the cheapest at 6.
8x versus Oracle Corporation at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, SAP SE is actually cheaper at 22. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Microsoft Corporation wins at 1. 26x versus Oracle Corporation's 5. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
Over the past 5 years, Oracle Corporation (ORCL) delivered a total return of +145.
7%, compared to +22. 8% for SAP SE (SAP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSFT returned +753. 0% versus KO's +118. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
20β versus Oracle Corporation's 1. 68β — meaning ORCL is approximately -940% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 4% for Oracle Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) is pulling ahead at 25.
4% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SAP SE grew EPS 126. 0% year-over-year, compared to 15. 6% for Microsoft Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, DJCO leads at 17. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
Daily Journal Corporation (DJCO) is the more profitable company, earning 127.
9% net margin versus 19. 1% for SAP SE — meaning it keeps 127. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSFT leads at 45. 6% versus 12. 9% for DJCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SAP leads at 73. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 26x versus Oracle Corporation's 5. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, SAP SE (SAP) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for Oracle Corporation — 3. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SAP: 46. 5% to $240. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP?
In this comparison, KO (2.
5% yield), SAP (1. 6% yield), ORCL (1. 0% yield), MSFT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. DJCO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DJCO or MSFT or KO or ORCL or SAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
20), 2. 5% yield, +118. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KO: +118. 2%, DJCO: +171. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DJCO and MSFT and KO and ORCL and SAP?
These companies operate in different sectors (DJCO (Technology) and MSFT (Technology) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and ORCL (Technology) and SAP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DJCO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; ORCL is a large-cap high-growth stock; SAP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT, KO, ORCL, SAP pay a dividend while DJCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.