Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $11.86B | $17.28B | $2.98B | $9.78B | $5.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $6.05B | $17.02B | $1.24B | $17.72B | $11.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-455M | $37M | $183M | $-485M |
| Gross Margin | 41.3% | 44.2% | 34.9% | 44.2% | 43.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | 4.4% | 9.3% | 5.2% | 17.8% |
| Forward P/E | 94.0x | 16.2x | 46.5x | 22.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.93B | $13.35B | $18M | $56.16B | $26.34B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.60B | $3.83B | $341M | $2.06B | $887M |
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 60.3 | -39.7% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 76.8 | -23.2% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 285.8 | +185.8% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 243.7 | +143.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DKNG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
FLUT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
RSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 189.6% 10Y total return vs CZR's 310.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
MGM lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CZR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs CZR's -4.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs MGM's 1.28, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.3% vs FLUT's -59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs FLUT's -1.6% |
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
CZR leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • FLUT leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DKNG and RSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 14.3x RSI's $1.2B. RSI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZR's -4.2%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $6.1B | $17.0B | $1.2B | $17.7B | $11.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $266M | $2.0B | $156M | $2.0B | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$455M | $37M | $183M | -$485M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $612M | $880M | $147M | $1.7B | $538M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.3% | +44.2% | +34.9% | +44.2% | +43.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +4.4% | +9.3% | +5.2% | +17.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | -2.7% | +3.0% | +1.0% | -4.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.1% | +5.2% | +11.8% | +9.8% | +4.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.8% | +17.4% | +41.1% | +4.2% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +192.9% | -21.7% | +60.0% | -5.9% | +11.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CZR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 50.3x trailing earnings, MGM trades at a 75% valuation discount to RSI's 199.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 46.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11.9B | $17.3B | $3.0B | $9.8B | $5.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $12.2B | $26.8B | $2.7B | $63.9B | $31.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2953.09x | -57.29x | 199.00x | 50.28x | -11.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 94.03x | 16.18x | 46.47x | 22.16x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 46.94x | 10.55x | 20.84x | 31.62x | 8.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.96x | 1.05x | 2.62x | 0.56x | 0.49x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 18.78x | 1.83x | 21.68x | 3.09x | 1.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.31x | 16.02x | 18.13x | 5.86x | 10.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-13 for CZR. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.5% | -4.4% | +12.9% | +5.3% | -12.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.1% | -1.6% | +6.0% | +0.4% | -1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.9% | +4.5% | — | +1.7% | +5.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.6% | +4.6% | +26.3% | +2.6% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.06x | 1.38x | 0.06x | 17.14x | 7.15x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $330M | $9.5B | -$322M | $54.1B | $25.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $3.8B | $341M | $2.1B | $887M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.9B | $13.3B | $18M | $56.2B | $26.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.92x | 0.04x | — | 1.52x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,920 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,716 for CZR. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +142.3% total return vs FLUT's -59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.3% vs FLUT's -20.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.9% | -54.6% | +44.3% | +4.7% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -28.8% | -59.6% | +142.3% | +21.6% | +3.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | -50.0% | +765.2% | -12.0% | -38.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -53.9% | -51.1% | +119.2% | -1.8% | -72.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +144.1% | -24.4% | +189.6% | +81.0% | +310.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | -20.6% | +105.3% | -4.2% | -15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MGM's 1.28 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 31.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.07x | 1.28x | 1.27x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $48.78 | $313.69 | $29.24 | $40.94 | $31.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.46 | $97.94 | $11.40 | $29.19 | $17.95 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +31.6% | +95.3% | +93.3% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 40.6 | 80.7 | 47.8 | 57.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12.8M | 3.4M | 1.7M | 4.4M | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FLUT and RSI each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DKNG as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", RSI as "Buy", MGM as "Buy", CZR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 129.9% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 3.9% for MGM (target: $40).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.88 | $227.86 | $30.40 | $39.71 | $30.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 48 | 24 | 13 | 36 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.0% | +6.5% | +0.3% | +12.6% | +4.1% |
RSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CZR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI vs MGM vs CZR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). MGM Resorts International (MGM) offers the better valuation at 50. 3x trailing P/E (22. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) a "Buy" — based on 48 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
On trailing P/E, MGM Resorts International (MGM) is the cheapest at 50.
3x versus Rush Street Interactive, Inc. at 199. 0x. On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +119. 2%, compared to -72. 8% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. (CZR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZR returned +310. 0% versus FLUT's -24. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus MGM Resorts International's 1. 28β — meaning MGM is approximately 19% more volatile than RSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -4. 4% for Caesars Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CZR leads at 18. 1% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
2x forward P/E versus 94. 0x for DraftKings Inc. — 77. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 129. 9% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is DKNG or FLUT or RSI or MGM or CZR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), +189. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RSI: +189. 6%, FLUT: -24. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DKNG and FLUT and RSI and MGM and CZR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock; MGM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CZR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.