Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Software - Application
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Telecommunications Services | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $5.49B | $4.25B | $4.31B | $213.51B | $7.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.34B | $876M | $1.04B | $44.49B | $829M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $241M | $106M | $29M | $9.92B | $366M |
| Gross Margin | 87.9% | 62.5% | 37.6% | 54.8% | 83.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.8% | 25.8% | 0.3% | 25.5% | 49.6% |
| Forward P/E | 13.3x | 36.1x | 62.6x | 18.8x | 38.8x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $1.76B | $0.00 | $16.37B | $506M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $702M | $97M | $404M | $7.84B | $739M |
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dolby Laboratories,… (DLB) | 100 | 94.6 | -5.4% |
| Iridium Communicati… (IRDM) | 100 | 174.7 | +74.7% |
| IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP) | 100 | 65.4 | -34.6% |
| QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM) | 100 | 250.5 | +150.5% |
| InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) | 100 | 507.1 | +407.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.82, yield 2.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 1.5%, current ratio 3.17x
- Beta 0.82, yield 2.3%, current ratio 3.17x
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 18.8x), PEG 4.29 vs 9.06
IRDM is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth 12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
IPGP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +75.6% vs DLB's -19.9%
QCOM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and efficiency is your priority.
- 13.7% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0%
- 18.4% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC 29.1% vs 0.6%
IDCC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 436.7% 10Y total return vs IRDM's 412.1%
- PEG 0.74 vs QCOM's 9.06
- 44.2% margin vs IPGP's 2.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs IDCC's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 18.8x), PEG 4.29 vs 9.06 | |
| Quality / Margins | 44.2% margin vs IPGP's 2.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs IPGP's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | 2.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs QCOM's 1.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.6% vs DLB's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 18.4% ROA vs IPGP's 1.2%, ROIC 29.1% vs 0.6% |
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories
DLB leads 2 • IRDM leads 0 • IPGP leads 0 • QCOM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IDCC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
QCOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $44.5B annually — 53.7x IDCC's $829M. IDCC is the more profitable business, keeping 44.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IPGP's 2.8%. On growth, IPGP holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $876M | $1.0B | $44.5B | $829M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $352M | $439M | $55M | $12.8B | $489M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $241M | $106M | $29M | $9.9B | $366M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $380M | $305M | $8M | $12.5B | $580M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.9% | +62.5% | +37.6% | +54.8% | +83.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.8% | +25.8% | +0.3% | +25.5% | +49.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +12.1% | +2.8% | +22.3% | +44.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +28.4% | +34.8% | +0.8% | +28.1% | +70.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +1.9% | +16.6% | -3.5% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.4% | -25.9% | -54.4% | +173.0% | -38.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DLB leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.9x trailing earnings, DLB trades at a 84% valuation discount to IPGP's 139.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IDCC offers better value at 0.45x vs QCOM's 19.44x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.5B | $4.2B | $4.3B | $213.5B | $7.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.8B | $5.9B | $3.9B | $222.0B | $6.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.93x | 37.92x | 139.22x | 40.43x | 23.62x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.27x | 36.13x | 62.62x | 18.84x | 38.81x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 7.09x | — | — | 19.44x | 0.45x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.27x | 13.25x | 48.90x | 15.91x | 12.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.07x | 4.87x | 4.30x | 4.82x | 8.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.13x | 9.37x | 2.04x | 10.56x | 8.73x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.76x | 14.17x | — | 16.65x | 13.58x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DLB leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
QCOM delivers a 40.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $1 for IPGP. DLB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IRDM's 3.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IRDM scores 8/9 vs IDCC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +22.8% | +1.4% | +40.2% | +33.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.5% | +4.1% | +1.2% | +18.4% | +17.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.1% | +8.0% | +0.6% | +29.1% | +40.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +9.6% | +0.6% | +28.9% | +38.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 3.81x | — | 0.77x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$663M | $1.7B | -$404M | $8.5B | -$233M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $702M | $97M | $404M | $7.8B | $739M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $1.8B | $0 | $16.4B | $506M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 65.71x | 2.67x | — | 17.60x | 11.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IDCC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IDCC five years ago would be worth $40,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,151 for IPGP. Over the past 12 months, IPGP leads with a +75.6% total return vs DLB's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IDCC at 52.1% vs IRDM's -12.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.0% | +127.1% | +35.8% | +17.6% | -14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.9% | +55.0% | +75.6% | +42.9% | +32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.0% | -33.9% | -12.7% | +96.4% | +251.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -34.6% | +10.7% | -48.5% | +58.5% | +303.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +412.1% | +20.2% | +350.2% | +436.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.0% | -12.9% | -4.4% | +25.2% | +52.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DLB and IRDM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DLB is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IPGP's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IRDM currently trades 90.6% from its 52-week high vs IPGP's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 1.05x | 1.80x | 1.55x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.28 | $44.36 | $155.82 | $223.66 | $412.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $55.73 | $15.65 | $53.98 | $121.99 | $205.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.4% | +90.6% | +65.2% | +90.6% | +67.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.6 | 63.3 | 39.7 | 80.1 | 30.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 610K | 2.3M | 510K | 15.1M | 393K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DLB and QCOM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLB as "Buy", IRDM as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold", IDCC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 52.5% upside for IDCC (target: $425) vs -13.6% for QCOM (target: $175). For income investors, DLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.26% vs IDCC's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $85.00 | $35.50 | $151.67 | $175.00 | $425.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 13 | 27 | 69 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +1.5% | — | +1.7% | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 3 | 1 | 23 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.30 | $0.58 | — | $3.44 | $1.76 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.0% | +4.4% | +1.3% | +4.1% | +1.4% |
IDCC leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). DLB leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DLB vs IRDM vs IPGP vs QCOM vs IDCC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is the stronger pick with 13.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) offers the better valuation at 21. 9x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
On trailing P/E, Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) is the cheapest at 21. 9x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 139. 2x. On forward P/E, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: InterDigital, Inc. wins at 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
Over the past 5 years, InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) delivered a total return of +303. 1%, compared to -48. 5% for IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IDCC returned +436. 7% versus IPGP's +20. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
(DLB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus IPG Photonics Corporation's 1. 80β — meaning IPGP is approximately 118% more volatile than DLB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for Iridium Communications Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM) is pulling ahead at 13.
7% versus -4. 0% for InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, IDCC leads at 22. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
InterDigital, Inc.
(IDCC) is the more profitable company, earning 48. 8% net margin versus 3. 1% for IPG Photonics Corporation — meaning it keeps 48. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IDCC leads at 55. 3% versus 1. 3% for IPGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DLB leads at 88. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, InterDigital, Inc. (IDCC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Dolby Laboratories, Inc. (DLB) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 62. 6x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 49. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IDCC: 52. 5% to $425. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC?
In this comparison, DLB (2.
3% yield), QCOM (1. 7% yield), IRDM (1. 5% yield), IDCC (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. IPGP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DLB or IRDM or IPGP or QCOM or IDCC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Iridium Communications Inc.
(IRDM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 05), 1. 5% yield, +412. 1% 10Y return). IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IRDM: +412. 1%, IPGP: +20. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLB and IRDM and IPGP and QCOM and IDCC?
These companies operate in different sectors (DLB (Technology) and IRDM (Communication Services) and IPGP (Technology) and QCOM (Technology) and IDCC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
DLB, IRDM, QCOM, IDCC pay a dividend while IPGP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.