Advertising Agencies
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
Information Technology Services
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Advertising Agencies | Specialty Business Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $1.21B | $615M | $30.38B | $24.47B | $10.57B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.13B | $204M | $21.09B | $10.89B | $2.52B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $107M | $35M | $3.20B | $382M | $519M |
| Gross Margin | 52.9% | 88.6% | 60.8% | 38.1% | 44.1% |
| Operating Margin | 12.2% | 19.0% | 24.4% | 17.5% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 6.6x | 15.9x | 7.0x | 7.5x | 21.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.55B | $5M | $29.12B | $4.01B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $311M | $392M | $798M | $599M | $102M |
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deluxe Corporation (DLX) | 100 | 115.0 | +15.0% |
| Cass Information Sy… (CASS) | 100 | 118.0 | +18.0% |
| Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) | 100 | 53.2 | -46.8% |
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 34.0 | -66.0% |
| Jack Henry & Associ… (JKHY) | 100 | 80.7 | -19.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DLX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 0.12 vs JKHY's 2.16
- Lower P/E (6.6x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.12 vs 2.16
- 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +83.0% vs FISV's -68.8%
CASS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 1.9%, current ratio 1.10x
FISV lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, FIS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
JKHY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 32 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.5%
- Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 19.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.9%
- 94.9% 10Y total return vs CASS's 57.2%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.2% revenue growth vs CASS's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.6x vs 21.8x), PEG 0.12 vs 2.16 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.6% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.28 vs DLX's 1.09 | |
| Dividends | 4.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs JKHY's 1.5%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.0% vs FISV's -68.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.0% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 21.0% vs 6.0% |
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories
DLX leads 1 • CASS leads 0 • FISV leads 0 • FIS leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JKHY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FISV is the larger business by revenue, generating $21.1B annually — 103.6x CASS's $204M. JKHY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%. On growth, JKHY holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.1B | $204M | $21.1B | $10.9B | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $395M | $44M | $7.5B | $3.8B | $810M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $107M | $35M | $3.2B | $382M | $519M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $204M | $32M | $4.0B | $2.8B | $728M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +52.9% | +88.6% | +60.8% | +38.1% | +44.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +19.0% | +24.4% | +17.5% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +17.3% | +15.2% | +3.5% | +20.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.5% | +15.6% | +19.0% | +26.1% | +28.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.3% | -10.1% | -2.0% | +8.2% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +148.4% | +87.9% | -29.1% | +92.3% | +12.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — DLX and FISV each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.0x trailing earnings, FISV trades at a 86% valuation discount to FIS's 63.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FISV offers better value at 0.25x vs FIS's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.2B | $615M | $30.4B | $24.5B | $10.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $227M | $58.7B | $27.9B | $10.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.91x | 18.25x | 8.96x | 63.00x | 23.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 6.60x | 15.87x | 7.01x | 7.54x | 21.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.28x | 2.13x | 0.25x | 2.58x | 2.32x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.19x | 5.86x | 6.63x | 7.66x | 13.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 3.22x | 1.43x | 2.29x | 4.45x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.79x | 2.64x | 1.21x | 1.76x | 5.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.90x | 19.35x | 7.00x | 9.97x | 17.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JKHY delivers a 24.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. CASS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DLX's 2.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CASS scores 8/9 vs FISV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +16.0% | +14.6% | +12.4% | +2.7% | +24.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +1.4% | +4.0% | +1.1% | +17.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.6% | — | +8.1% | +6.0% | +21.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.8% | +4.4% | +10.2% | +6.6% | +22.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.26x | 0.02x | 1.13x | 0.29x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$388M | $28.3B | $3.4B | -$102M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $311M | $392M | $798M | $599M | $102M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.5B | $5M | $29.1B | $4.0B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.09x | — | 6.39x | 4.64x | 122.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DLX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CASS five years ago would be worth $11,562 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,685 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, DLX leads with a +83.0% total return vs FISV's -68.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DLX at 27.4% vs FISV's -22.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.3% | +18.1% | -13.4% | -27.3% | -17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +83.0% | +17.2% | -68.8% | -35.3% | -13.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +106.9% | +37.5% | -52.5% | -6.6% | -1.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.6% | +15.6% | -51.7% | -63.2% | +0.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.8% | +57.2% | +9.7% | -13.2% | +94.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +27.4% | +11.2% | -22.0% | -2.2% | -0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CASS and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JKHY is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DLX's 1.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CASS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs FISV's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.09x | 0.74x | 0.94x | 0.76x | 0.28x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.07 | $52.45 | $191.91 | $82.74 | $193.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.61 | $36.07 | $52.91 | $43.30 | $141.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.7% | +90.8% | +29.6% | +57.1% | +75.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 33.0 | 52.5 | 36.5 | 43.3 | 28.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 368K | 74K | 5.3M | 5.5M | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — DLX and JKHY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DLX as "Buy", CASS as "Buy", FISV as "Buy", FIS as "Buy", JKHY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.6% upside for FIS (target: $67) vs 0.6% for DLX (target: $27). For income investors, DLX offers the higher dividend yield at 4.52% vs JKHY's 1.54%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $50.00 | $74.64 | $67.38 | $203.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 2 | 60 | 37 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.5% | +2.6% | — | +3.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 21 | — | 1 | 32 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.21 | $1.23 | — | $1.63 | $2.25 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.2% | +19.4% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
JKHY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DLX leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
DLX vs CASS vs FISV vs FIS vs JKHY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). Fiserv, Inc. (FISV) offers the better valuation at 9. 0x trailing P/E (7. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deluxe Corporation (DLX) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
On trailing P/E, Fiserv, Inc.
(FISV) is the cheapest at 9. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 63. 0x. On forward P/E, Deluxe Corporation is actually cheaper at 6. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Deluxe Corporation wins at 0. 12x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
Over the past 5 years, Cass Information Systems, Inc.
(CASS) delivered a total return of +15. 6%, compared to -63. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JKHY returned +94. 9% versus DLX's -38. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 28β versus Deluxe Corporation's 1. 09β — meaning DLX is approximately 283% more volatile than JKHY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Deluxe Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus -13. 1% for Cass Information Systems, Inc. (CASS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cass Information Systems, Inc. grew EPS 87. 8% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JKHY leads at 6. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FISV leads at 26. 9% versus 12. 3% for DLX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CASS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Deluxe Corporation (DLX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 12x versus Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. 's 2. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Deluxe Corporation (DLX) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 21. 8x for Jack Henry & Associates, Inc. — 15. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 42. 6% to $67. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY?
In this comparison, DLX (4.
5% yield), FIS (3. 5% yield), CASS (2. 6% yield), JKHY (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. FISV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DLX or CASS or FISV or FIS or JKHY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jack Henry & Associates, Inc.
(JKHY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 28), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JKHY: +94. 9%, FISV: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DLX and CASS and FISV and FIS and JKHY?
These companies operate in different sectors (DLX (Communication Services) and CASS (Industrials) and FISV (Technology) and FIS (Technology) and JKHY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DLX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CASS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FISV is a mid-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; JKHY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. DLX, CASS, FIS, JKHY pay a dividend while FISV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.