Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Travel Services
Semiconductors
Travel Services
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Leisure | Travel Services | Semiconductors | Travel Services |
| Market Cap | $205M | $32.62B | $74.46B | $4.43B | $7.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34M | $26.62B | $18.39B | $1.04B | $10.03B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-32M | $2.76B | $4.48B | $29M | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 61.6% | 37.4% | 47.2% | 37.6% | 43.0% |
| Operating Margin | -94.4% | 16.8% | 27.9% | 0.3% | 15.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.0x | 15.9x | 78.1x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $27.99B | $22.64B | $0.00 | $14.61B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $1.93B | $825M | $404M | $210M |
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) | 100 | 54.5 | -45.5% |
| Carnival Corporatio… (CCL) | 100 | 167.6 | +67.6% |
| Royal Caribbean Cru… (RCL) | 100 | 530.6 | +430.6% |
| IPG Photonics Corpo… (IPGP) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| Norwegian Cruise Li… (NCLH) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DMRC lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CCL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.72, yield 0.4%
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 42.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.6%
- 284.3% 10Y total return vs CCL's -32.4%
- 8.8% revenue growth vs DMRC's -11.7%
IPGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.68, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 1.68, current ratio 6.08x
- Beta 1.68 vs DMRC's 2.42
- +77.9% vs DMRC's -30.3%
NCLH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 78.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs DMRC's -11.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 78.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.4% margin vs DMRC's -95.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.68 vs DMRC's 2.42 | |
| Dividends | 0.4% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +77.9% vs DMRC's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.1% ROA vs DMRC's -54.8%, ROIC 12.2% vs -53.6% |
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RCL leads in 3 of 6 categories
DMRC leads 0 • CCL leads 0 • IPGP leads 0 • NCLH leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCL leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.6B annually — 785.0x DMRC's $34M. RCL is the more profitable business, keeping 24.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DMRC's -95.3%. On growth, IPGP holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34M | $26.6B | $18.4B | $1.0B | $10.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | $7.3B | $6.8B | $55M | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$32M | $2.8B | $4.5B | $29M | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$12M | $2.6B | $1.4B | $8M | -$949M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.6% | +37.4% | +47.2% | +37.6% | +43.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -94.4% | +16.8% | +27.9% | +0.3% | +15.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -95.3% | +10.4% | +24.4% | +2.8% | +5.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -36.8% | +9.8% | +7.5% | +0.8% | -9.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +6.6% | +11.3% | +16.6% | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +52.5% | +82.4% | +28.9% | -54.4% | +3.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CCL and NCLH each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.1x trailing earnings, CCL trades at a 91% valuation discount to IPGP's 143.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CCL's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than IPGP's 50.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $205M | $32.6B | $74.5B | $4.4B | $7.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $199M | $58.7B | $96.3B | $4.0B | $22.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.28x | 13.06x | 17.63x | 143.14x | 18.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.96x | 15.89x | 78.05x | 9.98x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.07x | 14.76x | 50.42x | 8.12x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.04x | 1.23x | 4.15x | 4.42x | 0.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.04x | 3.01x | 7.33x | 2.09x | 3.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 12.51x | 60.24x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RCL leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCL delivers a 44.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $45 in annual profit, vs $-73 for DMRC. DMRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NCLH's 6.61x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CCL scores 7/9 vs DMRC's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -72.6% | +22.5% | +44.9% | +1.4% | +27.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -54.8% | +5.3% | +11.1% | +1.2% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -53.6% | +8.9% | +12.2% | +0.6% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -57.6% | +11.8% | +17.3% | +0.6% | +10.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.11x | 2.28x | 2.21x | — | 6.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $26.1B | $21.8B | -$404M | $14.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $1.9B | $825M | $404M | $210M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $28.0B | $22.6B | $0 | $14.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 3.09x | 5.36x | — | 1.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RCL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RCL five years ago would be worth $33,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,261 for DMRC. Over the past 12 months, IPGP leads with a +77.9% total return vs DMRC's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RCL at 53.1% vs DMRC's -22.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +48.1% | -14.2% | -2.3% | +39.6% | -25.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -30.3% | +31.0% | +20.0% | +77.9% | -4.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.7% | +150.0% | +258.9% | -10.2% | +19.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.4% | +1.0% | +235.0% | -44.3% | -38.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.6% | -32.4% | +284.3% | +23.6% | -65.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -22.1% | +35.7% | +53.1% | -3.5% | +6.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CCL and IPGP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPGP is the less volatile stock with a 1.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DMRC's 2.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CCL currently trades 77.5% from its 52-week high vs NCLH's 62.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.42x | 2.28x | 1.72x | 1.68x | 2.25x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.64 | $34.03 | $366.50 | $155.82 | $27.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.07 | $19.90 | $229.20 | $58.09 | $16.87 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +63.9% | +77.5% | +75.1% | +67.1% | +62.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.1 | 50.8 | 54.7 | 39.5 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 223K | 27.2M | 2.6M | 504K | 21.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RCL and IPGP each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DMRC as "Buy", CCL as "Buy", RCL as "Buy", IPGP as "Buy", NCLH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 156.4% upside for DMRC (target: $24) vs 28.5% for RCL (target: $354). RCL is the only dividend payer here at 0.35% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $24.00 | $36.17 | $353.67 | $141.25 | $22.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 8 | 47 | 51 | 27 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.4% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.97 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +1.2% | +0.3% |
RCL leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
DMRC vs CCL vs RCL vs IPGP vs NCLH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 7% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) offers the better valuation at 13. 1x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
On trailing P/E, Carnival Corporation & plc (CCL) is the cheapest at 13.
1x versus IPG Photonics Corporation at 143. 1x. On forward P/E, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
Over the past 5 years, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) delivered a total return of +235. 0%, compared to -67. 4% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RCL returned +284. 3% versus DMRC's -67. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IPG Photonics Corporation (IPGP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
68β versus Digimarc Corporation's 2. 42β — meaning DMRC is approximately 44% more volatile than IPGP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 7% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -11. 7% for Digimarc Corporation (DMRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IPG Photonics Corporation grew EPS 117. 8% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CCL leads at 29. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 8% net margin versus -95. 3% for Digimarc Corporation — meaning it keeps 23. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RCL leads at 27. 4% versus -94. 4% for DMRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DMRC leads at 61. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.
(NCLH) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 78. 1x for IPG Photonics Corporation — 68. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DMRC: 156. 4% to $24. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH?
In this comparison, RCL (0.
4% yield) pays a dividend. DMRC, CCL, IPGP, NCLH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DMRC or CCL or RCL or IPGP or NCLH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
(RCL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+284. 3% 10Y return). Digimarc Corporation (DMRC) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RCL: +284. 3%, DMRC: -67. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DMRC and CCL and RCL and IPGP and NCLH?
These companies operate in different sectors (DMRC (Technology) and CCL (Consumer Cyclical) and RCL (Consumer Cyclical) and IPGP (Technology) and NCLH (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DMRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CCL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; RCL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; IPGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NCLH is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.