Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
Industrial - Machinery
Software - Application
Software - Application
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Trucking | Industrial - Machinery | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $6.12B | $11.99B | $9.94B | $5.52B | $1.19B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $731M | $3.25B | $4.26B | $1.68B | $978M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $164M | $255M | $40M | $238M | $73M |
| Gross Margin | 71.4% | 18.4% | 32.6% | 69.0% | 80.8% |
| Operating Margin | 30.4% | 10.8% | 8.5% | 20.1% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 38.2x | 42.3x | 16.4x | 13.2x | 4.7x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $418M | $3.74B | $218M | $851M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $354M | $20M | $366M | $398M | $95M |
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Descartes Syste… (DSGX) | 100 | 149.5 | +49.5% |
| Saia, Inc. (SAIA) | 100 | 414.4 | +314.4% |
| Chart Industries, I… (GTLS) | 100 | 529.3 | +429.3% |
| Paylocity Holding C… (PCTY) | 100 | 78.9 | -21.1% |
| Progress Software C… (PRGS) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DSGX has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.16x
- 22.5% margin vs GTLS's 0.9%
- 9.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 14.9% vs 7.4%
SAIA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- 15.6% 10Y total return vs GTLS's 7.4%
- +76.6% vs PRGS's -53.6%
GTLS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.56, yield 0.3%
- Beta 0.56, yield 0.3%, current ratio 1.36x
- 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGS's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
PCTY is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.47 vs SAIA's 3.29
- Beta 0.43 vs SAIA's 1.90
PRGS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 29.8%, EPS growth 7.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.5%
- 29.8% revenue growth vs SAIA's 0.8%
- Lower P/E (4.7x vs 16.4x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 29.8% revenue growth vs SAIA's 0.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.7x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.5% margin vs GTLS's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs SAIA's 1.90 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRGS's 0.1%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +76.6% vs PRGS's -53.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.2% ROA vs GTLS's 0.4%, ROIC 14.9% vs 7.4% |
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGS leads in 1 of 6 categories
DSGX leads 1 • SAIA leads 1 • GTLS leads 1 • PCTY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DSGX and PRGS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GTLS is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.3B annually — 5.8x DSGX's $731M. DSGX is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GTLS's 0.9%. On growth, PRGS holds the edge at +17.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $731M | $3.3B | $4.3B | $1.7B | $978M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $310M | $602M | $644M | $446M | $160M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $164M | $255M | $40M | $238M | $73M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $261M | $261M | $203M | $444M | $229M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +71.4% | +18.4% | +32.6% | +69.0% | +80.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +30.4% | +10.8% | +8.5% | +20.1% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +7.8% | +0.9% | +14.2% | +7.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.8% | +8.0% | +4.8% | +26.5% | +23.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.2% | +2.4% | -2.5% | +10.4% | +17.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.3% | 0.0% | -36.1% | +37.9% | +22.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGS leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.0x trailing earnings, PRGS trades at a 97% valuation discount to GTLS's 629.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PCTY offers better value at 0.90x vs SAIA's 3.67x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.1B | $12.0B | $9.9B | $5.5B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.8B | $12.4B | $13.3B | $5.3B | $1.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 37.26x | 47.21x | 629.58x | 25.50x | 16.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 38.15x | 42.32x | 16.43x | 13.20x | 4.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.45x | 3.67x | — | 0.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.52x | 20.61x | 14.35x | 13.24x | 12.22x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 8.22x | 3.71x | 2.33x | 3.46x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.87x | 4.67x | 2.79x | 4.70x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.00x | 438.47x | 49.04x | 16.12x | 5.20x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DSGX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PCTY delivers a 21.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $1 for GTLS. DSGX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGS's 1.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PCTY scores 8/9 vs GTLS's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.7% | +10.0% | +1.2% | +21.7% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +9.2% | +7.3% | +0.4% | +3.4% | +3.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +14.9% | +9.4% | +7.4% | +26.2% | +7.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +11.5% | +8.6% | +23.3% | +8.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 0.16x | 1.11x | 0.18x | 1.78x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$346M | $398M | $3.4B | -$180M | $756M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $354M | $20M | $366M | $398M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $418M | $3.7B | $218M | $851M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 229.22x | 23.88x | 1.08x | 23.29x | 2.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SAIA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SAIA five years ago would be worth $18,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,993 for PCTY. Over the past 12 months, SAIA leads with a +76.6% total return vs PRGS's -53.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GTLS at 17.7% vs PRGS's -18.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.4% | +33.3% | +0.7% | -29.6% | -31.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.9% | +76.6% | +37.4% | -45.2% | -53.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.0% | +56.2% | +63.0% | -40.9% | -45.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | +89.9% | +33.2% | -40.1% | -30.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +285.3% | +1557.1% | +740.5% | +208.3% | +35.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.7% | +16.0% | +17.7% | -16.1% | -18.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GTLS and PCTY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCTY is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SAIA's 1.90 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GTLS currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs PRGS's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.71x | 1.90x | 0.56x | 0.43x | 1.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $117.35 | $457.99 | $208.51 | $201.97 | $65.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $62.56 | $248.37 | $140.50 | $92.99 | $23.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.6% | +98.1% | +99.6% | +50.8% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 53.6 | 50.9 | 54.0 | 48.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 601K | 533K | 1.6M | 722K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
GTLS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DSGX as "Buy", SAIA as "Buy", GTLS as "Buy", PCTY as "Buy", PRGS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.9% upside for PCTY (target: $168) vs -6.7% for GTLS (target: $194). GTLS is the only dividend payer here at 0.29% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $103.50 | $422.67 | $193.81 | $168.08 | $45.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 32 | 37 | 41 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.3% | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.60 | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +2.7% | +8.8% |
PRGS leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). DSGX leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
DSGX vs SAIA vs GTLS vs PCTY vs PRGS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the stronger pick with 29.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 8% for Saia, Inc. (SAIA). Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) offers the better valuation at 17. 0x trailing P/E (4. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
On trailing P/E, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is the cheapest at 17.
0x versus Chart Industries, Inc. at 629. 6x. On forward P/E, Progress Software Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Paylocity Holding Corporation wins at 0. 47x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
Over the past 5 years, Saia, Inc.
(SAIA) delivered a total return of +89. 9%, compared to -40. 1% for Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SAIA returned +1557% versus PRGS's +35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Saia, Inc. 's 1. 90β — meaning SAIA is approximately 344% more volatile than PCTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Descartes Systems Group Inc. (DSGX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 178% for Progress Software Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) is pulling ahead at 29.
8% versus 0. 8% for Saia, Inc. (SAIA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Descartes Systems Group Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to -92. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GTLS leads at 38. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
(DSGX) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 5% net margin versus 1. 0% for Chart Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DSGX leads at 32. 3% versus 10. 9% for SAIA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRGS leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Paylocity Holding Corporation (PCTY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 47x versus Saia, Inc. 's 3. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Progress Software Corporation (PRGS) trades at 4. 7x forward P/E versus 42. 3x for Saia, Inc. — 37. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCTY: 63. 9% to $168. 08.
08Which pays a better dividend — DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS?
In this comparison, GTLS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DSGX, SAIA, PCTY, PRGS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DSGX or SAIA or GTLS or PCTY or PRGS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Chart Industries, Inc.
(GTLS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 56), +740. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLS: +740. 5%, PRGS: +35. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DSGX and SAIA and GTLS and PCTY and PRGS?
These companies operate in different sectors (DSGX (Technology) and SAIA (Industrials) and GTLS (Industrials) and PCTY (Technology) and PRGS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DSGX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SAIA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GTLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PCTY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRGS is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.