Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Oil & Gas Midstream
Information Technology Services
Insurance - Property & Casualty
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products | Oil & Gas Midstream | Information Technology Services | Insurance - Property & Casualty |
| Market Cap | $25M | $312K | $1.73B | $2.62B | $3.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $241M | $1M | $348M | $9.50B | $1.42B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $-19M | $75M | $-568M | $12M |
| Gross Margin | 2.9% | 38.8% | 52.9% | 22.7% | 62.9% |
| Operating Margin | -0.8% | -10.6% | 50.6% | 9.0% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 18.4x | 34.9x | 98.6x |
| Total Debt | $460K | $1M | $1.85B | $18.45B | $233M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $678K | $490K | $448M | $2.04B | $299M |
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Commodities L… (DTCK) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| AgriFORCE Growing S… (AGRI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) | 100 | 107.5 | +7.5% |
| VNET Group, Inc. (VNET) | 100 | 265.5 | +165.5% |
| Hagerty, Inc. (HGTY) | 100 | 124.4 | +24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTCK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
AGRI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth is your priority.
- 317.0% revenue growth vs DTCK's -30.6%
FLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 9.4%
- 238.4% 10Y total return vs HGTY's 3.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, current ratio 3.03x
- PEG 0.33 vs HGTY's 1.51
VNET lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HGTY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.2%, EPS growth 270.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 317.0% revenue growth vs DTCK's -30.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.4x vs 98.6x), PEG 0.33 vs 1.51 | |
| Quality / Margins | 21.5% margin vs AGRI's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs VNET's 2.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.4% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs HGTY's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.3% vs AGRI's -94.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.9% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC 6.1% vs -98.0% |
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FLNG leads in 5 of 6 categories
HGTY leads 1 • DTCK leads 0 • AGRI leads 0 • VNET leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLNG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VNET is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.5B annually — 7039.3x AGRI's $1M. FLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AGRI's -14.4%. On growth, VNET holds the edge at +23.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $241M | $1M | $348M | $9.5B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$2M | -$13M | $252M | $2.8B | $134M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | -$19M | $75M | -$568M | $12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $513,661 | -$9M | $133M | -$3.9B | $165M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +38.8% | +52.9% | +22.7% | +62.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -10.6% | +50.6% | +9.0% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.8% | -14.4% | +21.5% | -6.0% | +0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.2% | -6.8% | +38.4% | -40.7% | +11.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.3% | — | -3.7% | +23.8% | -2.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.7% | +12.6% | -52.4% | -2.1% | -191.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.1x trailing earnings, FLNG trades at a 75% valuation discount to VNET's 93.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FLNG offers better value at 0.41x vs HGTY's 1.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $25M | $311,837 | $1.7B | $2.6B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $25M | $1M | $3.1B | $5.0B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.29x | -0.02x | 23.14x | 93.06x | 27.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 18.35x | 34.94x | 98.63x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.41x | — | 1.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 12.39x | 15.46x | 19.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 4.59x | 4.97x | 2.16x | 2.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.71x | 0.05x | 2.40x | 2.58x | 4.68x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 12.81x | — | 17.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HGTY leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLNG delivers a 10.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $-160 for AGRI. DTCK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to VNET's 2.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), VNET scores 7/9 vs AGRI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.6% | -159.9% | +10.4% | -7.6% | +1.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -9.4% | -117.7% | +2.9% | -1.5% | +0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -34.3% | -98.0% | +6.1% | +2.4% | +17.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -39.5% | -117.1% | +7.1% | +3.2% | +7.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.07x | 0.24x | 2.57x | 2.67x | 0.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$218,000 | $995,040 | $1.4B | $16.4B | -$66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $678,000 | $489,868 | $448M | $2.0B | $299M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $460,000 | $1M | $1.8B | $18.4B | $233M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.92x | -7.20x | 1.81x | 1.75x | 115.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLNG five years ago would be worth $39,067 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for AGRI. Over the past 12 months, FLNG leads with a +46.3% total return vs AGRI's -94.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VNET at 44.4% vs AGRI's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -84.0% | -52.4% | +32.5% | -1.1% | -23.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -91.6% | -94.9% | +46.3% | +31.9% | +13.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -100.0% | +26.6% | +201.3% | +6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -100.0% | +290.7% | -63.7% | +3.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.0% | -100.0% | +238.4% | -51.7% | +3.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -78.4% | -96.9% | +8.2% | +44.4% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
FLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VNET's 2.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNG currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs DTCK's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 2.29x | 0.15x | 2.70x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $137.80 | $19.26 | $33.40 | $14.48 | $14.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $0.55 | $21.72 | $5.15 | $8.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +4.0% | +95.6% | +62.2% | +71.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 30.6 | 72.7 | 44.1 | 43.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 387K | 621K | 5.8M | 170K |
Analyst Outlook
FLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AGRI as "Buy", FLNG as "Hold", VNET as "Buy", HGTY as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 161.4% upside for VNET (target: $24) vs -24.9% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, FLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.39% vs HGTY's 0.16%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $24.00 | $23.55 | $14.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | 2 | 16 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +9.4% | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 2 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $3.00 | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
FLNG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). HGTY leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
DTCK vs AGRI vs FLNG vs VNET vs HGTY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is the stronger pick with 317. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -30. 6% for Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares (DTCK). FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) offers the better valuation at 23. 1x trailing P/E (18. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
On trailing P/E, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the cheapest at 23. 1x versus VNET Group, Inc. at 93. 1x. On forward P/E, FLEX LNG Ltd. is actually cheaper at 18. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FLEX LNG Ltd. wins at 0. 33x versus Hagerty, Inc. 's 1. 51x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
Over the past 5 years, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) delivered a total return of +290. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNG returned +238. 4% versus AGRI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus VNET Group, Inc. 's 2. 70β — meaning VNET is approximately 1668% more volatile than FLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares (DTCK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 3% for VNET Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd.
(AGRI) is pulling ahead at 317. 0% versus -30. 6% for Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares (DTCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Hagerty, Inc. grew EPS 270. 0% year-over-year, compared to -416. 0% for Davis Commodities Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, HGTY leads at 20. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 5% net margin versus -239. 7% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus -153. 2% for AGRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HGTY leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 33x versus Hagerty, Inc. 's 1. 51x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) trades at 18. 4x forward P/E versus 98. 6x for Hagerty, Inc. — 80. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VNET: 161. 4% to $23. 55.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY?
In this comparison, FLNG (9.
4% yield), HGTY (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. DTCK, AGRI, VNET do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTCK or AGRI or FLNG or VNET or HGTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.
(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 4% yield, +238. 4% 10Y return). AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 29 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +238. 4%, AGRI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTCK and AGRI and FLNG and VNET and HGTY?
These companies operate in different sectors (DTCK (Consumer Defensive) and AGRI (Consumer Defensive) and FLNG (Energy) and VNET (Technology) and HGTY (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DTCK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AGRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; VNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HGTY is a small-cap high-growth stock. FLNG pays a dividend while DTCK, AGRI, VNET, HGTY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.