Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Software - Application
Software - Application
Information Technology Services
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Aerospace & Defense | Software - Application | Software - Application | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $9M | $134M | $21M | $8M | $19.73B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $57M | $28M | $19M | $115M | $127M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $4M | $3M | $-53M | $-289M |
| Gross Margin | 7.4% | 66.3% | 51.0% | 64.3% | 25.8% |
| Operating Margin | -4.7% | 17.4% | 10.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.5x | 7.8x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $3M | $395K | $929K | $46M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $621K | $29M | $8M | $847K | $87M |
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Datasea Inc. (DTSS) | 100 | 4.9 | -95.1% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 162.6 | +62.6% |
| MIND C.T.I. Ltd (MNDO) | 100 | 51.0 | -49.0% |
| Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI) | 100 | 1.2 | -98.8% |
| BigBear.ai Holdings… (BBAI) | 100 | 170.9 | +70.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTSS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 198.7%, EPS growth 82.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 61.3%
- 198.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3%
CODA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 8.4% 10Y total return vs MNDO's 66.7%
- 14.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7%
- +78.9% vs AIXI's -79.2%
MNDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.07, yield 21.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.07, Low D/E 4.0%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 0.07, yield 21.6%, current ratio 3.83x
- Better valuation composite
AIXI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, BBAI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 198.7% revenue growth vs BBAI's -19.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs BBAI's -226.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.07 vs BBAI's 3.31 | |
| Dividends | 21.6% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +78.9% vs AIXI's -79.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 8.6% vs -34.4% |
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
MNDO leads 1 • BBAI leads 1 • DTSS leads 0 • AIXI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BBAI is the larger business by revenue, generating $127M annually — 6.5x MNDO's $19M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BBAI's -2.3%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $57M | $28M | $19M | $115M | $127M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1M | $6M | $2M | -$49M | -$75M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $4M | $3M | -$53M | -$289M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $7M | $4M | -$2M | -$56M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +66.3% | +51.0% | +64.3% | +25.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.7% | +17.4% | +10.7% | -44.2% | -68.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +14.8% | +13.4% | -45.9% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.1% | +24.6% | +20.9% | -2.0% | -44.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -36.5% | +28.8% | -6.0% | -64.9% | -0.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +62.5% | +3.0% | -23.4% | -29.9% | +52.0% |
Valuation Metrics
MNDO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 7.8x trailing earnings, MNDO trades at a 76% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MNDO's 5.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $9M | $134M | $21M | $8M | $19.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11M | $106M | $13M | $53M | $19.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.16x | 32.16x | 7.77x | -0.45x | -5.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.45x | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 17.85x | 5.68x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 5.05x | 1.06x | 0.11x | 154.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.01x | 2.30x | 0.90x | — | 24.45x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.20x | 5.20x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MNDO delivers a 11.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-5 for DTSS. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DTSS's 0.91x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs BBAI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.0% | +7.2% | +11.9% | — | -50.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.7% | +6.6% | +8.6% | -65.3% | -35.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -135.0% | +11.2% | +8.6% | -34.4% | -19.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.7% | +8.1% | +7.8% | -3.4% | -19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.91x | 0.01x | 0.04x | — | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$28M | -$7M | $45M | -$63M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $620,807 | $29M | $8M | $846,593 | $87M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $394,932 | $929,000 | $46M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | -14.13x | -18.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $138 for AIXI. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs AIXI's -79.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BBAI at 14.3% vs AIXI's -75.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +30.8% | +25.1% | -13.7% | +68.1% | -28.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.2% | +78.9% | -34.8% | -79.2% | +36.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.7% | +34.5% | -24.2% | -98.6% | +49.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.8% | +49.7% | -35.0% | -98.6% | -56.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | +844.4% | +66.7% | -98.6% | -57.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -62.5% | +10.4% | -8.8% | -75.9% | +14.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CODA and MNDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BBAI's 3.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODA currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs AIXI's 18.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.67x | 1.00x | 0.07x | 0.94x | 3.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.80 | $17.28 | $1.64 | $4.02 | $9.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.64 | $5.98 | $0.98 | $0.08 | $2.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.0% | +68.9% | +61.6% | +18.0% | +44.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.8 | 48.6 | 27.4 | 49.3 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 256K | 37K | 60.6M | 34.6M |
Analyst Outlook
BBAI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", BBAI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 43.9% upside for BBAI (target: $6) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). MNDO is the only dividend payer here at 21.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $14.00 | — | — | $6.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 1 | — | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +21.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.22 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MNDO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
DTSS vs CODA vs MNDO vs AIXI vs BBAI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datasea Inc.
(DTSS) is the stronger pick with 198. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). MIND C. T. I. Ltd (MNDO) offers the better valuation at 7. 8x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
On trailing P/E, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the cheapest at 7. 8x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -98. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus DTSS's -99. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 07β versus BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 31β — meaning BBAI is approximately 4702% more volatile than MNDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 91% for Datasea Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datasea Inc.
(DTSS) is pulling ahead at 198. 7% versus -19. 3% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Datasea Inc. grew EPS 82. 4% year-over-year, compared to -43. 5% for MIND C. T. I. Ltd. Over a 3-year CAGR, DTSS leads at 61. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) is the more profitable company, earning 15. 5% net margin versus -230. 2% for BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -65. 3% for BBAI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BBAI: 43.
9% to $6. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI?
In this comparison, MNDO (21.
6% yield) pays a dividend. DTSS, CODA, AIXI, BBAI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTSS or CODA or MNDO or AIXI or BBAI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MIND C.
T. I. Ltd (MNDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 07), 21. 6% yield). BigBear. ai Holdings, Inc. (BBAI) carries a higher beta of 3. 31 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNDO: +66. 7%, BBAI: -57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTSS and CODA and MNDO and AIXI and BBAI?
These companies operate in different sectors (DTSS (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and MNDO (Technology) and AIXI (Technology) and BBAI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DTSS is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; MNDO is a small-cap deep-value stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BBAI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. MNDO pays a dividend while DTSS, CODA, AIXI, BBAI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.