Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Specialty Retail
Computer Hardware
Software - Infrastructure
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Semiconductors | Specialty Retail | Computer Hardware | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $31M | $5.14T | $2.92T | $76.89B | $3.13T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $215.94B | $742.78B | $113.54B | $318.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $16M | $120.07B | $90.80B | $5.94B | $125.22B |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | 71.1% | 50.6% | 20.0% | 68.3% |
| Operating Margin | -8.5% | 60.4% | 11.5% | 7.2% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 58.1x | 26.0x | 34.8x | 26.1x | 25.3x |
| Total Debt | $673K | $11.41B | $152.99B | $31.50B | $112.18B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $10.61B | $86.81B | $11.53B | $30.24B |
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data Storage Corpor… (DTST) | 100 | 3872.7 | +3772.7% |
| NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) | 100 | 2423.6 | +2323.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 223.3 | +123.3% |
| Dell Technologies I… (DELL) | 100 | 1035.0 | +935.0% |
| Microsoft Corporati… (MSFT) | 100 | 226.5 | +126.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DTST ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 3.2%, current ratio 4.35x
- 81.5% margin vs DELL's 5.2%
NVDA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
- 239.0% 10Y total return vs DTST's 206.0%
- PEG 0.27 vs MSFT's 1.35
- 65.5% revenue growth vs DTST's 1.6%
Among these 5 stocks, AMZN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
DELL is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +142.7% vs MSFT's -2.1%
MSFT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.8%
- Beta 0.89, yield 0.8%, current ratio 1.35x
- Lower P/E (25.3x vs 26.1x)
- Beta 0.89 vs NVDA's 1.73
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 65.5% revenue growth vs DTST's 1.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (25.3x vs 26.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 81.5% margin vs DELL's 5.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs NVDA's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs NVDA's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +142.7% vs MSFT's -2.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 58.1% ROA vs DELL's 5.9%, ROIC 81.8% vs 33.0% |
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories
MSFT leads 2 • DTST leads 0 • AMZN leads 0 • DELL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 37020.6x DTST's $20M. DTST is the more profitable business, keeping 81.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DELL's 5.2%. On growth, NVDA holds the edge at +73.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $215.9B | $742.8B | $113.5B | $318.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$440,228 | $133.2B | $155.9B | $8.3B | $192.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $16M | $120.1B | $90.8B | $5.9B | $125.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$52,808 | $96.7B | -$2.5B | $4.6B | $72.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.9% | +71.1% | +50.6% | +20.0% | +68.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -8.5% | +60.4% | +11.5% | +7.2% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +81.5% | +55.6% | +12.2% | +5.2% | +39.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.3% | +44.8% | -0.3% | +4.1% | +22.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -92.8% | +73.2% | +16.6% | +40.2% | +18.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.7% | +97.8% | +74.8% | -100.0% | +23.4% |
Valuation Metrics
MSFT leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 30.9x trailing earnings, MSFT trades at a 47% valuation discount to DTST's 58.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.45x vs MSFT's 1.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $31M | $5.14T | $2.92T | $76.9B | $3.13T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $31M | $5.14T | $2.98T | $96.9B | $3.21T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 58.15x | 43.16x | 37.82x | — | 30.86x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 26.00x | 34.77x | 26.11x | 25.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.45x | 1.35x | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.05x | 38.59x | 20.47x | 11.89x | 19.72x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.22x | 23.80x | 4.07x | 0.68x | 11.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.44x | 32.85x | 7.14x | — | 9.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 53.17x | 378.98x | — | 43.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVDA delivers a 76.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. DTST carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMZN's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DTST scores 6/9 vs DELL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +41.7% | +76.3% | +23.3% | — | +33.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.3% | +58.1% | +11.5% | +5.9% | +19.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.3% | +81.8% | +14.7% | +33.0% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.4% | +97.2% | +15.3% | +22.9% | +29.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.07x | 0.37x | — | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$396,647 | $807M | $66.2B | $20.0B | $81.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $10.6B | $86.8B | $11.5B | $30.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $673,450 | $11.4B | $153.0B | $31.5B | $112.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.10x | 545.03x | 39.96x | 6.01x | 55.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NVDA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DTST five years ago would be worth $188,182 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, DELL leads with a +142.7% total return vs MSFT's -2.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 93.6% vs MSFT's 11.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.8% | +12.0% | +19.7% | +81.1% | -10.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.3% | +80.7% | +43.7% | +142.7% | -2.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +130.0% | +625.9% | +156.2% | +412.6% | +39.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1781.8% | +1328.9% | +64.8% | +364.0% | +72.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20600.0% | +23902.3% | +697.8% | +1868.4% | +787.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.0% | +93.6% | +36.8% | +72.4% | +11.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVDA and MSFT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSFT is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVDA's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVDA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs MSFT's 75.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.74x | 1.50x | 1.75x | 0.85x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.44 | $216.80 | $278.56 | $239.40 | $555.45 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.25 | $112.28 | $185.01 | $92.88 | $356.28 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +76.1% | +97.6% | +97.3% | +96.2% | +75.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.2 | 60.7 | 81.1 | 77.2 | 54.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 29K | 164.5M | 45.5M | 7.9M | 32.5M |
Analyst Outlook
MSFT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVDA as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy", DELL as "Buy", MSFT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.1% upside for MSFT (target: $552) vs -20.7% for DELL (target: $183). MSFT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $275.74 | $306.77 | $182.67 | $551.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 79 | 94 | 43 | 81 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.0% | — | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 | — | 2 | 19 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.04 | — | — | $3.23 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | 0.0% | +7.8% | +0.6% |
NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MSFT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
DTST vs NVDA vs AMZN vs DELL vs MSFT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 6% for Data Storage Corporation (DTST). Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) offers the better valuation at 30. 9x trailing P/E (25. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) a "Buy" — based on 79 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
On trailing P/E, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the cheapest at 30.
9x versus Data Storage Corporation at 58. 1x. On forward P/E, Microsoft Corporation is actually cheaper at 25. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 27x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
Over the past 5 years, Data Storage Corporation (DTST) delivered a total return of +1782%, compared to +64.
8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +243. 2% versus AMZN's +702. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
85β versus Dell Technologies Inc. 's 1. 75β — meaning DELL is approximately 105% more volatile than MSFT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Data Storage Corporation (DTST) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 37% for Amazon. com, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.
5% versus 1. 6% for Data Storage Corporation (DTST). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NVIDIA Corporation grew EPS 66. 7% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Dell Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.
6% net margin versus 2. 1% for Data Storage Corporation — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 0. 3% for DTST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVDA leads at 71. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 27x versus Microsoft Corporation's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) trades at 25. 3x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 9. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MSFT: 31. 1% to $551. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT?
In this comparison, MSFT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. DTST, NVDA, AMZN, DELL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DTST or NVDA or AMZN or DELL or MSFT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
85), 0. 8% yield, +776. 0% 10Y return). Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) carries a higher beta of 1. 75 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSFT: +776. 0%, DELL: +21. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DTST and NVDA and AMZN and DELL and MSFT?
These companies operate in different sectors (DTST (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical) and DELL (Technology) and MSFT (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: DTST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; DELL is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MSFT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. MSFT pays a dividend while DTST, NVDA, AMZN, DELL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.