REIT - Mortgage
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
REIT - Mortgage
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $2.66B | $995M | $9.62B | $16.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $421M | $650M | $3.46B | $6.70B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $319M | $135M | $838M | $2.03B |
| Gross Margin | 99.9% | 59.3% | 100.0% | 99.2% |
| Operating Margin | 107.8% | 41.0% | 107.1% | 102.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.5x | 7.1x | 6.9x | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $13.91B | $10.99B | $64M | $111.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $930M | $213M | $505M | $2.04B |
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) | 100 | 103.6 | +3.6% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 144.2 | +44.2% |
| AGNC Investment Cor… (AGNC) | 100 | 82.8 | -17.2% |
| Annaly Capital Mana… (NLY) | 100 | 90.9 | -9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
DX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 59.1% 10Y total return vs NLY's 35.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54
- 75.8% margin vs MFA's 20.7%
- Beta 0.54 vs MFA's 0.77, lower leverage
MFA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.77, yield 18.4%
- Beta 0.77, yield 18.4%, current ratio 2.18x
- 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGNC's 14.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
AGNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 384.7%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.4%
- 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4%
- Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x)
- +39.4% vs MFA's +19.2%
NLY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 384.7% FFO/revenue growth vs NLY's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.9x vs 7.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 75.8% margin vs MFA's 20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs MFA's 0.77, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 18.4% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs AGNC's 14.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.4% vs MFA's +19.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.8% ROA vs AGNC's 0.8%, ROIC 4.8% vs 34.0% |
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
DX leads in 2 of 6 categories
MFA leads 2 • AGNC leads 1 • NLY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NLY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.7B annually — 15.9x DX's $421M. DX is the more profitable business, keeping 75.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MFA's 20.7%. On growth, DX holds the edge at +3.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $421M | $650M | $3.5B | $6.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $572M | $268M | $3.7B | $6.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $319M | $135M | $838M | $2.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $107M | $91M | $604M | -$222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.9% | +59.3% | +100.0% | +99.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +107.8% | +41.0% | +107.1% | +102.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +75.8% | +20.7% | +24.2% | +30.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +14.0% | +17.5% | -3.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.2% | +118.9% | +2.5% | -8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +93.3% | -103.0% | +84.6% | +79.5% |
Valuation Metrics
MFA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, DX trades at a 53% valuation discount to AGNC's 11.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AGNC's 2.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DX's 21.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.7B | $995M | $9.6B | $16.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $15.6B | $11.8B | $9.2B | $125.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.39x | 5.80x | 11.53x | 7.67x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.53x | 7.11x | 6.87x | 7.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.19x | 17.07x | 2.42x | 18.32x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 6.32x | 1.14x | 1.97x | 2.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.56x | 0.86x | 0.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 13.06x | 111.86x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AGNC leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NLY delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for AGNC. AGNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NLY's 6.92x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MFA scores 5/9 vs DX's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +7.4% | +7.3% | +14.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.8% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +4.4% | +34.0% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +5.8% | +4.9% | +19.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 5.65x | 6.01x | 0.01x | 6.92x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13.0B | $10.8B | -$441M | $109.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $930M | $213M | $505M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.9B | $11.0B | $64M | $111.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 1.34x | 1.32x | 1.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DX five years ago would be worth $10,815 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,782 for AGNC. Over the past 12 months, AGNC leads with a +39.4% total return vs MFA's +19.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DX at 19.1% vs MFA's 10.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.6% | +6.1% | +2.5% | +0.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +25.5% | +19.2% | +39.4% | +31.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +69.0% | +34.1% | +58.3% | +60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.2% | -0.6% | -2.2% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +59.1% | +7.8% | +46.9% | +35.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +19.1% | +10.3% | +16.5% | +17.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — DX and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DX is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MFA's 0.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFA currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs AGNC's 87.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.54x | 0.77x | 0.74x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.93 | $10.57 | $12.19 | $24.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $8.78 | $8.65 | $18.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +92.2% | +87.9% | +91.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.7 | 43.8 | 52.1 | 52.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.7M | 1.4M | 18.2M | 7.0M |
Analyst Outlook
MFA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DX as "Hold", MFA as "Hold", AGNC as "Hold", NLY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.4% upside for DX (target: $17) vs 3.8% for AGNC (target: $11). For income investors, MFA offers the higher dividend yield at 18.36% vs NLY's 13.11%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $16.83 | $10.25 | $11.13 | $24.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 22 | 35 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +18.4% | +14.7% | +13.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.79 | $1.58 | $2.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +0.1% |
DX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MFA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
DX vs MFA vs AGNC vs NLY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is the stronger pick with 384. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Dynex Capital, Inc. (DX) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (9. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
On trailing P/E, Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus AGNC Investment Corp. at 11. 5x. On forward P/E, AGNC Investment Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
Over the past 5 years, Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) delivered a total return of +8. 2%, compared to -2. 2% for AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DX returned +59. 1% versus MFA's +7. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus MFA Financial, Inc. 's 0. 77β — meaning MFA is approximately 43% more volatile than DX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 7% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) is pulling ahead at 384. 7% versus 5. 4% for Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AGNC Investment Corp. grew EPS 1760% year-over-year, compared to 65. 8% for Dynex Capital, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DX leads at 33. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
Dynex Capital, Inc.
(DX) is the more profitable company, earning 75. 9% net margin versus 17. 7% for AGNC Investment Corp. — meaning it keeps 75. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DX leads at 175. 6% versus 78. 8% for MFA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DX leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AGNC Investment Corp.
(AGNC) trades at 6. 9x forward P/E versus 9. 5x for Dynex Capital, Inc. — 2. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DX: 26. 4% to $16. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY?
In this comparison, MFA (18.
4% yield), AGNC (14. 7% yield), NLY (13. 1% yield) pay a dividend. DX does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is DX or MFA or AGNC or NLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
(NLY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 13. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NLY: +35. 5%, DX: +59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between DX and MFA and AGNC and NLY?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: DX is a small-cap high-growth stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGNC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NLY is a mid-cap deep-value stock. MFA, AGNC, NLY pay a dividend while DX does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.