EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
Electrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2.42B
5Y Perf.-88.4%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CSTM
Constellium SE
Aluminum
Market Cap$4.61B
5Y Perf.+341.1%
MP
MP Materials Corp.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$11.98B
5Y Perf.+576.3%
MTRN
Materion Corporation
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$4.15B
5Y Perf.+224.2%
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EAF | CSTM | MP | MTRN |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Aluminum | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $2.42B | $4.61B | $11.98B | $4.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $517M | $9.29B | $305M | $1.92B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-224M | $441M | $-71M | $76M |
| Gross Margin | -2.7% | 13.1% | 8.3% | 15.8% |
| Operating Margin | -11.4% | 6.8% | -40.9% | 6.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.2x | 254.2x | 31.2x |
| Total Debt | $1.09B | $1.94B | $1.04B | $601M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $138M | $120M | $1.17B | $14M |
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EAF
CSTM
MP
MTRN
| Stock | Jun 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| GrafTech Internatio… (EAF) | 100 | 11.6 | -88.4% |
| Constellium SE (CSTM) | 100 | 441.1 | +341.1% |
| MP Materials Corp. (MP) | 100 | 676.3 | +576.3% |
| Materion Corporation (MTRN) | 100 | 324.2 | +224.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: CSTM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. MP Materials Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. MTRN also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EAF
GrafTech International Ltd.
The Secondary Option
EAF lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: industrials exposure
CSTM
Constellium SE
The Growth Play
CSTM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth 418.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.3%
- Lower P/E (10.2x vs 31.2x)
- 4.7% margin vs EAF's -43.2%
- +202.8% vs EAF's +30.3%
Best for: growth exposure
MP
MP Materials Corp.
The Defensive Pick
MP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.44, Low D/E 43.6%, current ratio 7.24x
- Beta 1.44, current ratio 7.24x
- 35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4%
- Beta 1.44 vs EAF's 1.99
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MTRN
Materion Corporation
The Income Pick
MTRN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 1.67, yield 0.3%
- 7.6% 10Y total return vs MP's 5.7%
- 0.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MP | 35.1% revenue growth vs EAF's -6.4% |
| Value | CSTM | Lower P/E (10.2x vs 31.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | CSTM | 4.7% margin vs EAF's -43.2% |
| Stability / Safety | MP | Beta 1.44 vs EAF's 1.99 |
| Dividends | MTRN | 0.3% yield; 13-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CSTM | +202.8% vs EAF's +30.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | CSTM | 8.0% ROA vs EAF's -21.1%, ROIC 13.4% vs -7.9% |
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2021
FY 2025
FY 2024
FY 2025
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCSTMLAGGINGMP
Who Leads Where
CSTM leads in 3 of 6 categories
MTRN leads 1 • EAF leads 0 • MP leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓MPMP Materials Corp.
0leads
EAFGrafTech Internationa…
0leads
MTRNMaterion Corporation
1leads
CSTMConstellium SE
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MTRNvs EAFMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
CSTM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CSTM4/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
CSTM6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
Tied
—
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MTRN1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CSTM is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.3B annually — 30.4x MP's $305M. CSTM is the more profitable business, keeping 4.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EAF's -43.2%. On growth, MP holds the edge at +49.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $517M | $9.3B | $305M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$11M | $978M | -$24M | $187M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$224M | $441M | -$71M | $76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$105M | $175M | -$314M | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +13.1% | +8.3% | +15.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | +6.8% | -40.9% | +6.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.2% | +4.7% | -23.3% | +4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.3% | +1.9% | -102.8% | +0.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.9% | +14.9% | +49.1% | +30.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.3% | +4.3% | +71.4% | +8.2% |
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, CSTM trades at a 68% valuation discount to MTRN's 55.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CSTM's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTRN's 25.6x.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $4.6B | $12.0B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $6.4B | $11.9B | $4.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.93x | 17.65x | -134.86x | 55.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.19x | 254.17x | 31.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 1.52x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 8.01x | — | 25.60x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.81x | 0.55x | 43.49x | 2.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 4.95x | 4.80x | 4.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 29.02x | — | 83.00x |
CSTM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSTM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CSTM delivers a 46.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $47 in annual profit, vs $-4 for MP. MP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CSTM's 2.00x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSTM scores 8/9 vs EAF's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +46.9% | -3.7% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -21.1% | +8.0% | -2.0% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | +13.4% | -4.7% | +6.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.8% | +13.9% | -4.2% | +7.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 2.00x | 0.44x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $956M | $1.8B | -$123M | $587M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $138M | $120M | $1.2B | $14M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.1B | $1.9B | $1.0B | $601M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.50x | 7.26x | -2.80x | 4.07x |
CSTM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — CSTM and MP and MTRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTRN five years ago would be worth $26,740 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $816 for EAF. Over the past 12 months, CSTM leads with a +202.8% total return vs EAF's +30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MP at 46.4% vs EAF's -39.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -43.4% | +71.4% | +22.7% | +55.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.3% | +202.8% | +182.7% | +164.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.4% | +119.1% | +213.8% | +92.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.8% | +100.4% | +154.6% | +167.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -83.3% | +521.6% | +574.3% | +759.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.1% | +29.9% | +46.4% | +24.5% |
Evenly matched — CSTM and MP and MTRN each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CSTM and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MP is the less volatile stock with a 1.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EAF's 1.99 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CSTM currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs EAF's 45.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.99x | 1.87x | 1.44x | 1.67x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.32 | $33.89 | $100.25 | $201.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.92 | $10.90 | $18.64 | $73.11 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.7% | +100.0% | +67.3% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.8 | 64.0 | 60.1 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 279K | 2.3M | 5.7M | 231K |
Evenly matched — CSTM and MP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MTRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EAF as "Hold", CSTM as "Buy", MP as "Buy", MTRN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.1% upside for MP (target: $81) vs -19.2% for MTRN (target: $161). MTRN is the only dividend payer here at 0.28% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | EAFGrafTech Internat… | CSTMConstellium SE | MPMP Materials Corp. | MTRNMaterion Corporat… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $10.00 | $36.25 | $81.00 | $161.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 17 | 12 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | — | 13 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
MTRN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
CSTM leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MTRN leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.
Best OverallConstellium SE (CSTM)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EAF vs CSTM vs MP vs MTRN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger pick with 35. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Constellium SE (CSTM) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Constellium SE (CSTM) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
On trailing P/E, Constellium SE (CSTM) is the cheapest at 17.
6x versus Materion Corporation at 55. 7x. On forward P/E, Constellium SE is actually cheaper at 10. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
Over the past 5 years, Materion Corporation (MTRN) delivered a total return of +167.
4%, compared to -91. 8% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTRN returned +759. 2% versus EAF's -83. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 44β versus GrafTech International Ltd. 's 1. 99β — meaning EAF is approximately 38% more volatile than MP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MP Materials Corp. (MP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 2% for Constellium SE — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is pulling ahead at 35. 1% versus -6. 4% for GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Materion Corporation grew EPS 1179% year-over-year, compared to -66. 7% for GrafTech International Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MTRN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
Materion Corporation (MTRN) is the more profitable company, earning 4.
2% net margin versus -43. 6% for GrafTech International Ltd. — meaning it keeps 4. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MTRN leads at 6. 5% versus -44. 6% for MP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTRN leads at 16. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Constellium SE (CSTM) trades at 10.
2x forward P/E versus 254. 2x for MP Materials Corp. — 244. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MP: 20. 1% to $81. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN?
In this comparison, MTRN (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. EAF, CSTM, MP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EAF or CSTM or MP or MTRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MP Materials Corp.
(MP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+574. 3% 10Y return). GrafTech International Ltd. (EAF) carries a higher beta of 1. 99 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MP: +574. 3%, EAF: -83. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EAF and CSTM and MP and MTRN?
These companies operate in different sectors (EAF (Industrials) and CSTM (Basic Materials) and MP (Basic Materials) and MTRN (Basic Materials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EAF is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CSTM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MP is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTRN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EAF: 11.9% · CSTM: 14.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.