Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $4.49B | $799M | $2.35B | $699M | $2.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $634M | $867M | $315M | $1.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $88M | $-128M | $169M | $69M | $224M |
| Gross Margin | 66.2% | 3.2% | 72.1% | 69.6% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.9% | -26.9% | 25.3% | 25.8% | 25.5% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 15.7x | 10.8x | 9.6x | 11.5x |
| Total Debt | $215M | $147M | $327M | $117M | $1.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $126M | $12M | $185M | $52M | $668M |
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Eastern Bankshares,… (EBC) | 100 | 167.0 | +67.0% |
| Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN) | 100 | 87.6 | -12.4% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 226.8 | +126.8% |
| Trustmark Corporati… (TRMK) | 100 | 191.9 | +91.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EBC is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.42 vs IBCP's 1.82
EGBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner)
- +46.7% vs NBTB's +9.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6%
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EBC's 2.4%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 184.6% 10Y total return vs TRMK's 127.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.5x)
TRMK is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.4% vs EGBN's 2.6%
- 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.8% NII/revenue growth vs EGBN's -10.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 11.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs EGBN's 1.21 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs EBC's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +46.7% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs EBC's 0.6% |
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
NBTB leads 1 • EBC leads 0 • EGBN leads 0 • TRMK leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EBC and IBCP each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMK is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.1B annually — 3.6x IBCP's $315M. IBCP is the more profitable business, keeping 21.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EGBN's -20.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $634M | $867M | $315M | $1.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $157M | -$168M | $241M | $89M | $323M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $88M | -$128M | $169M | $69M | $224M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $413M | -$6M | $225M | $70M | $230M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.2% | +3.2% | +72.1% | +69.6% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.9% | -26.9% | +25.3% | +25.8% | +25.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | -20.2% | +19.5% | +21.7% | +20.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +39.1% | +3.3% | +25.2% | +22.2% | +20.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.3% | -50.0% | +39.5% | +2.3% | +5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — EGBN and IBCP each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 79% valuation discount to EBC's 49.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TRMK offers better value at 1.50x vs EBC's 1.98x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $799M | $2.4B | $699M | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.6B | $935M | $2.5B | $764M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 49.90x | -6.23x | 13.53x | 10.38x | 12.13x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.65x | 15.73x | 10.80x | 9.56x | 11.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.98x | — | 1.92x | 1.97x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 29.14x | — | 10.35x | 9.39x | 9.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.25x | 1.26x | 2.71x | 2.22x | 2.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 0.69x | 1.21x | 1.41x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.87x | 38.50x | 10.75x | 9.96x | 11.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-11 for EGBN. EBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRMK's 0.53x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs EGBN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.3% | -10.9% | +9.5% | +14.2% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.3% | -1.2% | +1.1% | +1.3% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.9% | -8.2% | +7.9% | +10.2% | +7.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.0% | -2.9% | +2.4% | +2.6% | +3.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.13x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.53x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $89M | $135M | $142M | $65M | $448M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $126M | $12M | $185M | $52M | $668M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $215M | $147M | $327M | $117M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.31x | -0.51x | 1.05x | 0.91x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,901 for EGBN. Over the past 12 months, EGBN leads with a +46.7% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs EGBN's 13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +25.8% | +9.3% | +7.2% | +15.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +36.2% | +46.7% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +97.4% | +47.1% | +54.1% | +130.6% | +118.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -0.4% | -41.0% | +29.9% | +63.7% | +47.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +82.4% | -31.7% | +102.2% | +184.6% | +127.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +25.4% | +13.7% | +15.5% | +32.1% | +29.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBCP and TRMK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EGBN's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRMK currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs EBC's 88.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 1.21x | 0.89x | 0.83x | 0.94x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.57 | $29.26 | $46.92 | $37.39 | $45.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.10 | $15.03 | $39.20 | $29.63 | $33.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.4% | +89.6% | +96.1% | +90.8% | +97.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.7 | 53.5 | 57.3 | 50.6 | 56.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 281K | 236K | 176K | 392K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EBC as "Buy", EGBN as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", TRMK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.4% upside for EBC (target: $23) vs 1.4% for TRMK (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs EGBN's 1.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $22.83 | $28.67 | $46.00 | $38.00 | $45.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 10 | 7 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +1.9% | +3.2% | +3.0% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.51 | $1.43 | $1.03 | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.4% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +1.8% | +3.0% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NBTB leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
EBC vs EGBN vs NBTB vs IBCP vs TRMK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is the stronger pick with 34.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Eastern Bankshares, Inc. at 49. 9x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Eastern Bankshares, Inc. wins at 0. 42x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -41. 0% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBCP returned +184. 6% versus EGBN's -31. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Eagle Bancorp, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning EGBN is approximately 47% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 53% for Trustmark Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is pulling ahead at 34.
8% versus -10. 4% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NBT Bancorp Inc. grew EPS 12. 5% year-over-year, compared to -169. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
7% net margin versus -20. 2% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBCP leads at 25. 8% versus -26. 9% for EGBN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Eastern Bankshares, Inc. (EBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 42x versus Independent Bank Corporation's 1. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 15. 7x for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EBC: 14. 4% to $22. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the highest yield at 3. 2%, versus 1. 9% for Eagle Bancorp, Inc. (EGBN).
09Is EBC or EGBN or NBTB or IBCP or TRMK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, EGBN: -31. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EBC and EGBN and NBTB and IBCP and TRMK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EBC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; EGBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMK is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.